Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 93, Issue 8, pp 1310–1318 | Cite as

Components of resistance of leaf rust (Melamspora laricii epitea Kleb./Melampsora ribesii-viminalis Kleb.) in Salix viminalis L.

  • M. Lascoux
  • M. Ramstedt
  • B. Åström
  • U. Gullberg
Article

Abstract

Selection on partial resistance components, namely latent period, development rate of uredia and number and size of uredia, has been suggested as a means to achieve durable resistance. Three experiments were carried out in growth chambers to assess the impact of environmental and genetic factors on these components in the Salix-Melampsora host-pathogen system. They confirmed the environmental ability of the Melampsora-Salicaceae relationship and provided no definite answer on the possibility of attaining durable resistance through selection on partial resistance components. On the one hand, there is a large amount of heritable variation among clones for most components; on the other hand, all components were extremely sensitive to environmental conditions and isolates, making the development of standard selection methods difficult.

Key words

Durability Melampsora Resistance components Salix 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Briggs SP, Johal GS (1944) Genetic patterns of plant host-parasite interactions. Trends Genet 10:12–16Google Scholar
  2. Bull JJ (1994) Virulence. Evolution 48:1423–1437Google Scholar
  3. Caten CE (1987) The concept of race in plant pathology. In: Wolfe MS, Caten CE (eds.) Populations of plant pathogens: their dynamics and genetics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 21–37Google Scholar
  4. Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Gullberg U (1993) Towards making willows pilot species for copping production. For Chron 69:5–10Google Scholar
  6. Gullberg U, Ryttman H (1993) Genetics of field resistance to Melampsora in Salix viminalis. Eur J For Pathol 23:75–84Google Scholar
  7. Heather WA, Chandrashekar M (1982) Evolutionary, epidemiological and ecological implications of forms of resistance in Populus ssp. to Melampsora leaf rust. Aust For Res 12:231–144Google Scholar
  8. Houle D (1992) Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195–204Google Scholar
  9. Julkunen-Tiitto R (1989) Phenolic constitution of Salix: a chemotaxonomic survey of further Finnish species. Phytochemistry 28:2115–2125Google Scholar
  10. Kang H, Lascoux M, Gullberg U (1995) Systematic tree breeding. In: Mandal AK (ed) Tree breeding. Indian Council of Forestry and Education, New Delhi, (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Kremer A, Lascoux DM (1988) Genetic architecture of height growth in Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) Silvae Genet 37:1–8Google Scholar
  12. Lefèvre F, Pichot C, Pinon J (1994) Intraand interspecific inheritance of some components of the resistance of leaf rust (Melampsora larici-populina Kleb.) in poplars. Theor Appl Genet 88:501–507Google Scholar
  13. Leonard KJ (1987) The host population as a selective factor. In: Wolfe MS, Caten CE (eds) Populations of plant pathogens: their dynamics and genetics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 163–179Google Scholar
  14. May RM (1985) Host-parasite associations: their population biology and population genetics. In: Rollison D, Anderson RM (eds) Ecology and genetics of host-parasite interactions (Linnean Society Symposium Series). Academic Press. London, pp 243–262Google Scholar
  15. May RM (1992) Resisting resistance. Nature 361:593–594Google Scholar
  16. Nowak MA, May RM (1994) Superinfection and the evolution of parasite virulence. Proc R Soc London Ser B 255:81–89Google Scholar
  17. Parlevliet JE (1993) What is durable resistance, a general outline. In: Jacob T, Parlevliet JE (eds) Durability of disease resistance. Kluwer Academic, The Hague, pp 23–39Google Scholar
  18. Parlevliet JE, Van Ommeren A (1988) Accumulation of partial resistance in barley to barley leaf rust and powdery mildew through recurrent selection against susceptibility. Euphytica 37:261–274Google Scholar
  19. Saarikoski P, von Arnold S, Clapham D, Gullberg U (1992) Genetic differences in wound-induced ethylene production among different clones of Salix viminalis L. Silvae Genet 42:121–126Google Scholar
  20. Salisbury FB, Ross CW (1985) Plant physiology, 3rd edn. Wadsworth Publ, Belmont, Calif.Google Scholar
  21. Sas Institute (1985) SAS/STAT guide for personnal computers, Version 6. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  22. Suneson CA (1960) Genetic diversity — a protection against diseases and insects. Agron J 33:451–466Google Scholar
  23. Suzuki K (1973) Studies on the suspectibility to popular leaf rust influenced by different nutrient conditions. I. Change of susceptibility induced by nutrient deficiency. J Jpn For Soc 55:29–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Lascoux
    • 1
  • M. Ramstedt
    • 2
  • B. Åström
    • 2
  • U. Gullberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant BreedingUppsala Genetic Center, Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Plant and Forest ProtectionSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations