Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 93, Issue 8, pp 1267–1273 | Cite as

Doubled haploids of wheat from wheat x maize crosses:genotypic influence, fertility and inheritance of the 1BL-1RS chromosome

  • D. Lefebvre
  • P. Devaux
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The wheat x maize cross as a technique for haploid induction in wheat was evaluated in a replicated block design comprising 18 wheat F1 hybrids and five Zea mays L. parents. Haploid plants were regenerated at an average of 9.1 (4.4–14.7) plants per 100 florets processed. Genotypic differences for haploid production efficiency were recorded for both wheat and Zea mays L. Interaction between parents was significant for number of plants/100 florets. All 610 of the 1,703 regenerated plantlets that were analyzed by flow cytometry were haploid. At maturity, 70% (60–81 %) of the colchicinetreated haploid plants were fertile, but the frequency of fertile and sterile plants was not consistent over the wheat hybrids from which they were derived. Flow cytometry performed using the first tiller which arose following colchicine treatment enabled prediction of fertility. The 1BL-1RS chromosome was found at the expected ratios in the F2 and in the haploid progenies produced through the wheat x maize cross but deviated from the 1∶1 ratio in the haploid progenies produced by anther culture.

Key words

Wheat Wheat x maize cross Haploid Doubled haploid Distortion of segregation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agache S, Bachelier B, De Buyser J, Henry Y, Snape JW (1989) Genetic analysis of anther culture response in wheat using aneuploid. chromosome substitution and translocation lines. Theor Appl Genet 77:7–11Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth C, Gale MD (1987) Enzyme structural genes and their exploitation in wheat genetics and breeding. In: Kruger JE, Staufer CE, Lineback DR (eds) Enzymes and their role in cereal technology. Amer Assoc Cereal Chem, St Paul, pp 53–82Google Scholar
  3. Bergounioux C, Perennes C, Miège C, Gadal P (1986) Male sterility effect upon protoplast division in Petunia hybrida. Protoplasma 130:138–144Google Scholar
  4. Biom (1989) A package of statistical programs. Applied Biostatistics, Setauket, N.Y.Google Scholar
  5. Bjørnstad Å (1986) Partial incompatibility between Scandinavian six-rowed barleys (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Hordeum bulbosum L., and its genetical basis. Hereditas 104:171–191Google Scholar
  6. Comeau A, Nadeau P, Plourde A, Simard R, Maës O, Kelly S, Harper L, Lettre J, Landry B, St-Pierre CA (1992) Media for the in ovulo culture of proembryos of wheat and wheat-derived interspecific hybrids or haploids. Plant Sci 81:117–125Google Scholar
  7. D'Amato F (1990) Somatic nuclear mutations in vivo and in vitro in higher plants. Caryologia 43:191–204Google Scholar
  8. Devaux P (1992) Haploidy in barley and wheat improvement. In: Dattée Y, Dumas C, Gallais A (eds) Reproductive biology and plant breeding. (Proc 8th Eucarpia Congress) Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 139–151Google Scholar
  9. Devaux P, Zivy M (1994) Protein markers for anther culturability in barley. Theor Appl Genet 88:701–706Google Scholar
  10. Devaux P, Lonnet P, Jean R (1990) Significant higher proportions of 1BL-1RS wheat-rye translocation lines among doubled haploid progenies derived from F1 hybrids between translocated and non-translocated wheat cultivars. In: Nijkamp NJJ, Van der Plas LHW, Van Aartrijk J (eds) Progress in plant cellular and molecular biology. (Proc 7th Int Cong Plant Tissue Cell Cult.) Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp 422–426Google Scholar
  11. Devaux P, Adamski T, Surma M(1992) Inheritance of seed set in crosses of spring barley and Hordeum bulbosum L. Crop. Sci 32:269–271Google Scholar
  12. De Vries SC, Booij H, Janssens R, Vogels R, Saris L, Lo Schiaro F, Terzi M, Van Kammen A (1988) Carrot somatic embryogenesis depends on the phytohormone-controlled presence of correctly glycosylated extracellular proteins, Genes Dev 2:462–476Google Scholar
  13. Dpac (1994) Data pool application software for CA-II, version 2.1. Partec, Münster, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  14. Foroughi-Wehr B, Zeller FJ (1990) In Vitro microspore reaction of different German wheat cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 79:77–80Google Scholar
  15. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Olima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cell. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158Google Scholar
  16. Hayes PM, Chen FQ (1989) Genotypic variation for Hordeum bulbosum L.-mediated haploid production in winter and facultative barley. Crop Sci 29:1184–1188Google Scholar
  17. Henry Y, De Buyser J (1985) Effect of the 1B/1R translocation on anther culture ability in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plant Cell Rep 4:307–310Google Scholar
  18. Henry Y, De Buyser (1990) Wheat anther culture: agronomic performance of doubled haploid lines and the release of a new variety ‘Florin’. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol 13. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 285–352Google Scholar
  19. Henry Y, Bernard S, Bernard M, Gay G, Marcotte JL, De Buyser J (1993) Nuclear gametophytic genes from chromosome arm 1RS improve regeneration of wheat microspore-derived embryos. Genome 36:808–814Google Scholar
  20. Hougas RW, Peloquin SJ, Gabert AC (1964) Effect of speed-parent and pollinator on frequency of haploids in Solanum tuberosum. Crop Sci 4:593–595Google Scholar
  21. Inagaki M, Tahir M (1990) Comparison of haploid production frequencies in wheat varieties crossed with Hordeum bulbosum L. and maize. Jpn J Breed 40:209–216Google Scholar
  22. Jiang J, Friebe B, Gill BS (1994) Recent advances in alien gene transfer in wheat. Euphytica 73:199–212Google Scholar
  23. Kasha KJ, Reinbergs E (1982) Recent developments in the production and utilization of haploids in barley. In: Asher MJC, Ellis RP, Hayter AM, Whitehouse RNH (eds) Proc 4th Int Barley Genet Symp. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 655–665Google Scholar
  24. Kisana NS, Nkongolo KK, Quick JS, Johnson DL (1993) Production of doubled haploids by anther culture and wheat x maize method in a wheat breeding programme. Plant Breed 110:96–102Google Scholar
  25. Kleinhofs A, Kilian A, Kudrna D, Bollinger J, Hayes P, Chen FQ, Saghai Maroof MA, Lapitan N, Fenwick A, Blake TM, Kanazin V, Ananiev E, Dahleen L, Liu B, Sorrells M, Heun M, Franckowiak JD, Hoffman D, Skadsen R, Steffenson BJ, Knapp SJ (1993) A molecular, isozyme and morphological map of the barley (Hordeum vulgare) genome. Theor Appl Genet 86:705–712Google Scholar
  26. Kotch GP, Peloquin SJ (1987) A new source of haploid germplasm for genetic and breeding research. Am Potato J 64:137–141Google Scholar
  27. Laurie DA, Bennett MD (1986) Wheat x maize hybridization. Can J Genet Cytol 28:313–316Google Scholar
  28. Laurie DA, Bennett MD (1988) The production of haploid wheat plants from wheat x maize crosses. Theor Appl Genet 76: 393–397Google Scholar
  29. Laurie DA, Reymondie S (1991) High frequencies of fertilization and haploid seedling production in crosses between commercial hexaploid wheat varieties and maize. Plant Breed 106:182–189Google Scholar
  30. Laurie DA, O'Donoughue L, Bennett MD (1990) Wheat x maize and other wide sexual hybrids: their potential for genetic manipulation and crop improvement. In: Gustafson JP (ed) Gene manipulation in plant improvement II. Plenum, New York, pp 95–126Google Scholar
  31. Lazar MD, Schaeffer GW, Baenziger PS (1984) Cultivar and cultivar x environment effects on the development of callus and polyhaploid plants from anther cultures of wheat. Theor Appl Genet 67: 273–277Google Scholar
  32. Lee M, Phillips RL (1988) The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Bio 39:413–437Google Scholar
  33. Lindsey K, Topping JF (1993) Embryogenesis: a question of pattern. J Exp Bot 44: 359–374Google Scholar
  34. Marsolais AA, Séguin-Swartz G, Kasha KJ (1984) The influence of anther cold pretreatments and donor plant genotypes on in vitro androgenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 3:69–79Google Scholar
  35. Mayer U, Torres Ruiz RA, Berleth T, Misera S, Jurgens G (1991) Mutations affecting body organization in the Arabidopsis embryo. Nature 33:402–407Google Scholar
  36. Meinke DW (1985) Embryo-lethal mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana: analysis of mutants with a wide range of lethal phases. Theor Appl Genet 69:543–552Google Scholar
  37. O'Donoughue LS, Bennett MD (1994) Comparative responses of tetraploid wheats pollinated with Zea mays L. and Hordeum bulbosum L. Theor Appl Genet 87:673–680Google Scholar
  38. Orlov PA, Mavrishcheva EB, Palilova AN (1993) Estimation of the response to anther culturing in 60 genotypes of different wheat species. Plant Breed 111:339–342Google Scholar
  39. Oury FX, Pichon M, Rousset M (1993) Une comparison entre 2 méthodes d'haplodiploïdisation chez le blé tendre: l'androgenèse in vitro et le croisement interspécifique avecle maïs. Agronomie 13: 95–103Google Scholar
  40. Pickering RA (1980) Use of the doubled haploid technique in barley breeding at the Welsh Plant Breeding Station. Rep Welsh Plant Breed Stn for 1979, Aberystwyth, pp 208–226Google Scholar
  41. Pickering RA (1983) The influence of genotype on doubled haploid barley production. Euphytica 32:863–876Google Scholar
  42. Pickering RA (1984) Crossability relationships between certain species in the Hordeae. Barley Genet Newsl 14:14–17Google Scholar
  43. Pickering RA, Rennie WF (1990) The evaluation of superior Hordeum bulbosum L. genotypes for the use in a doubled haploid barley breeding programme. Euphytica 45:251–255Google Scholar
  44. Riera-Lizarazu O, Mujeeb-Kazi A, William MDHM (1992) Maize (Zea mays L.) mediated polyhaploid production in some Triticeae using a detached tiller method. J Genet Breed 46: 335–346Google Scholar
  45. Sarrafi A, Amrani N, Alibert G (1994) Haploid regeneration from tetraploid wheat using a maize pollen. Genome 37:176–178Google Scholar
  46. Sheridan WF, Clark JK (1993) Mutational analysis of morphogenesis of the maize embryo. Plant J 3:347–358Google Scholar
  47. Simpson E, Snape JW, Finch RA (1980) Variation between Hordeum bulbosum genotypes in their ability to produce haploids of barley, Hordeum vulgare. Z Pflanzenzuechtg 85:205–211Google Scholar
  48. Sokal RR, Rolf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Statistix (1992) Analytical software version 4.0. Statistix, St. Paul, Minn.Google Scholar
  50. Suenaga K, Nakajima K (1989) Efficient production of haploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) through crosses between Japanese wheat and maize (Zea mays). Plant Cell Rep 8:263–266Google Scholar
  51. Suenaga K, Tamaki M, Nakajima K (1991) Influence of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) genotypes on haploid wheat production in crosses between wheat and maize. Bull Natl Inst Agrobiol Resour 6:131–142Google Scholar
  52. Turkula TE, Jalal SM (1985) Increased rates of sister chromatid exchanges induced by the herbicide 2,4-D. J Hered 76:213–214Google Scholar
  53. Ushiyama T, Shimizu T, Kuwabara T (1991) High frequency of haploid production of wheat through intergeneric cross with teosinte. Jpn J Breed 41:353–357Google Scholar
  54. Van Engelen FA, De Vries SC (1992) Extracellular proteins in plant embryogenesis. Trends Genet 8:66–70Google Scholar
  55. Vasil V, Redway F, Vasil IK (1990) Regeneration of plants from embryogenic suspension culture protoplasts of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Bio/Technology 8: 429–434Google Scholar
  56. Wendel JF, Weeden NF (1989) Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS (eds) Isozymes in plant biology. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Ore., pp 5–45Google Scholar
  57. Ziegler G, Dressler K, Hess D (1990) Investigations on the anther culturability of four German spring wheat cultivars and the influence of light on regeneration of green vs. albino plants. Plant Breed 105:40–46Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Lefebvre
    • 1
  • P. Devaux
    • 1
  1. 1.Florimond Desprez, Laboratoire de BiotechnologieCappelle en PévèleFrance

Personalised recommendations