Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 93, Issue 3, pp 392–401

Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) in soybean: species diversity, inheritance, and near-isogenic line analysis

  • P. J. Maughan
  • M. A. Saghai Maroof
  • G. R. Buss
  • G. M. Huestis
Article

Abstract

Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis is a PCR-based technique capable of detecting more than 50 independent loci in a single PCR reaction. The objectives of the present study were to: (1) assess the extent of AFLP variation in cultivated (Gycine max L. Merr.) and wild soybean (G. soja Siebold & Zucc.), (2) determine genetic relationships among soybean accessions using AFLP data, and (3) evaluate the usefulness of AFLPs as genetic markers. Fifteen AFLP primer pairs detected a total of 759 AFLP fragments in a sample of 23 accessions of wild and cultivated soybean, with an average of 51 fragments produced per primer pair per accession. Two-hundred and seventy four fragments (36% of the total observed) were polymorphic, among which 127 (17%) were polymorphic in G. max and 237 (31%) were polymorphic in G. soja. F2 segregation analysis of six AFLP fragments indicated that they segregate as stable Mendelian loci. The number of polymorphic loci detected per AFLP primer pair in a sample of 23 accessions ranged from 9 to 27. The AFLP phenotypic diversity values were greater in wild than in cultivated soybean. Cluster and principal component analyses using AFLP data clearly separated G. max and G. soja accessions. Within the G. max group, adapted soybean cultivars were tightly clustered, illustrating the relatively low genetic diversity present in cultivated soybean. AFLP analysis of four soybean near-isogenic lines (NILs) identified three AFLP markers putatively linked to a virus resistance gene from two sources. The capacity of AFLP analysis to detect thousands of independent genetic loci with minimal cost and time requirements makes them an ideal marker for a wide array of genetic investigations.

Key words

Phenotypic diversity Glycine max Genetic mapping Soybean mosaic virus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akkaya MS, Bhagwat AA, Cregan PB (1992) Length polymorphisms of simple sequence repeat DNA in soybean. Genetics 132:1131–1139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Apuya NR, Frazier BL, Keim P, Roth EJ, Lark KG (1988) Restriction fragment polymorphisms as genetic markers in soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. Theor Appl Genet 75:889–901Google Scholar
  3. Bernard RL (1976) United States national germ plasm collections. In: Hill LD (ed) World soybean research. Interstate Printers and Publishers Inc., Danville, Illinois, pp 286–289Google Scholar
  4. Bernard RL, Juvik GA, Nelson RL (1989) USDA soybean germ plasm collection inventory. INTSOY Series Number 31, vol 2Google Scholar
  5. Bowman KD, Hutcheson, K, Odum EP, Shenton LR (1971) Comments on the distribution of indices of diversity. Stat Ecol 3:315–359Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter JA, Fehr W (1986) Genetic variability for desirable agronomic traits in populations containing Glycine soja germ plasm. Crop Sci 26:681–686Google Scholar
  7. Caviness CE, Walters HJ (1975) Registration of Lee 68 soybeans. Crop Sci 15:777Google Scholar
  8. Delanney X, Rodgers DM, Palmer RG (1983) Relative genetic contribution among ancestral lines to North American soybean cultivars. Crop Sci 23:944–949Google Scholar
  9. Doyle JJ, Beachy RN (1985) Ribosomal gene variation in soybean (Glycine) and its relatives. Theor Appl Genet 70:369–376Google Scholar
  10. Keim P, Shoemaker RC, Palmer RG (1989) Restriction fragment length polymorphism diversity in soybean. Theor Appl Genet 77:786–792Google Scholar
  11. Keim P, Beavis W, Schupp J, Freestone R (1992) Evaluation of soybean RFLP marker diversity in adapted germ plasm. Theor Appl Genet 85:205–212Google Scholar
  12. Kiang YT, Chiang YC, Kaizuma N (1992) Genetic diversity in natural populations of wild soybean in Iwate prefecture, Japan. J Hered 83:325–329Google Scholar
  13. Lark KG, Weisemann JM, Matthews BF, Palmer R, Chase K, Macalma T (1993) A genetic map of soybean (Glycine max L.) using an intraspecific cross of two cultivars: ‘Minsoy’ and ‘Noirl’. Theor Appl Genet 86:901–906Google Scholar
  14. Maughan PJ, Saghai Maroof MA, Buss GR (1995) Microsatellite and amplified sequence length polymorphisms in cultivated and wild soybean. Genome 38:715–723Google Scholar
  15. Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseli, RV (1991) Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis:a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:9828–9832PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Muehlbauer GJ, Specht JE, Thomas-Compton MA, Staswick PE, Bernard RL (1988) Near-isogenic lines — a potential resource in the integration of convential and molecular marker linkage maps. Crop Sci 28:279–735Google Scholar
  17. Rohlf FJ (1992) NTSYS-pc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter Software, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Rongwen J, Akkaya MS, Bhagwat AA, Lavi U, Cregan PB (1994) The use of microsatellite DNA markers for soybean genotype identification. Theor Appl Genet 90:43–48Google Scholar
  19. Saghai Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:1757–1761Google Scholar
  20. Singh RJ, Hymowitz T (1988) The genomic relationship between Glycine max (L.) Merr.and Glycine soja Sieb. and Zucc. as revealed by pachytene chromosome analysis. Theor Appl Genet 76:705–711Google Scholar
  21. Skorupska HT, Shoemaker RC, Warner A, Shipe ER, Bridges WC (1993) Restriction fragment length polymorphism in soybean germ plasm of the southern USA. Crop Sci 33:1169–1176Google Scholar
  22. Skroch P, Tivang J, Nienhuis J (1992) Analysis of genetic relationships using RAPD marker data. In:Proc Symp Applic RAPD Technol Plant Breed, Minneapolis, Minn Crop Sci Soc Am, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 26–30Google Scholar
  23. Smith TJ, Camper HM (1973) Registration of Essex soybean. Crop Sci 13:495Google Scholar
  24. Smith S, Luk S, Sobral B, Muhawish S, Peleman J, Zabeau M (1994) Associations among inbred lines of maize using RFLP and DNA amplification technologies (AFLP and AP-PCR), and correlations with pedigree, F1 yield and heterosis. Maize Genet Newslett 68:45Google Scholar
  25. Sokal RR, Michener CD (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 38:1409–1438Google Scholar
  26. Specht JE, Williams JH (1984) Contribution of genetic technology to soybean productivity — retrospect and prospect. In: Genetic contributions to yield gains of five major crop plants. Am Soc Agron Madison, Wisconsin, pp 49–74Google Scholar
  27. Tingey SV, Rafalski JA, Williams GK (1992) Genetic analysis with RAPD markers. In:Proc Symp Applic RAPD Technol Plant Breed, Minneapolis, Minn Crop Sci Soc Am, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 3–8Google Scholar
  28. Wachira FN, Waugh R, Hackett CA, Powell W (1995) Detection of genetic diversity in tea (Camellia sinensis) using RAPD markers. Genome 38:201–210Google Scholar
  29. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Young ND, Zamir D, Ganal MW, Tanksley SD (1988) Use of isogenic lines and simultaneous probing to identify DNA markers tightly linked to the Tm-2a gene in tomato. Genetics 120:579–585Google Scholar
  31. Yu YG, Saghai Maroof MA, Buss GR, Maughan PJ, Tolin SA (1994) RFLP and microsatellite mapping of a gene for soybean mosaic virus resistance. Phytopathology 84:60–64Google Scholar
  32. Zabeau M, Vos P (1993) Selective restriction fragment amplifications general method for DNA fingerprinting. European Patent Application No. 0534858 A1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Maughan
    • 1
  • M. A. Saghai Maroof
    • 1
  • G. R. Buss
    • 1
  • G. M. Huestis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil Environmental SciencesVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations