Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 53–63 | Cite as

A comparison of genetic information from open-pollinated and control-pollinated progeny tests in two eucalypt species

  • G. R. Hodge
  • P. W. Volker
  • B. M. Potts
  • J. V. Owen
Article

Abstract

Genetic-parameter estimates and parental breeding-value predictions were compared from open-pollinated and control-pollinated progeny populations of Eucalyptus globulus and two populations of E. nitens. For E. globulus there were two types of open-pollinated populations (native stand open-pollinated and seed orchard open-pollinated) and two types of control-pollinated populations (intra-provenance and interprovenance full-sib families). For E. nitens there were two populations, a seed orchard open-pollinated population and intra-provenance full-sib families. Progeny tests were established across multiple sites and 2-year height and diameter were measured and volume calculated. Genetic parameters from native stand open-pollinated E. globulus were unlike the parameters from the other three E. globulus populations; heritability estimates were severely inflated, presumably due to high levels, and possibly differential levels, of inbreeding depression relative to the other populations. Estimates of dominance variance in the E. globulus full-sib populations were high, but were zero in the E. nitens population. Correlations among parental breeding values, predicted using data from the different populations, were generally low and non-significant, with two exceptions: predictions from the two E. globulus full-sib populations were significantly correlated (r=0.54, P = 0.001), as were predictions from the E. nitens seed orchard OP and full-sib population (r = 0.61, P = 0.08). There was some indication that superior parents of E. globulus native stand open-pollinated families also tended to have above-average breeding values based on the performance of intra-provenance full-sib offspring. The consequences of these results for exploitation of base-population collections from native stands are discussed.

Key words

Heritability Dominance Genotype x environment interaction Inbreeding Eucalyptus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balocchi CE, Bridgwater FE, Zobel BJ, Jahromi S (1993) Age trends in genetic parameters for tree height in a non-selected population of loblolly pine. For Sci 39:231–251Google Scholar
  2. Borralho NMG (1994) Short note: effect of heterogeneous selfing rates and dominance effects in estimating heritabilities from open-pollinated progeny. Silvae Genetica (in press)Google Scholar
  3. Borralho NMG, Kanowski PJ, Cotterill PP (1992) Genetic control of growth of Eucalyptus globulus in Portugal. I. Genetic and phenotypic parameters. Silvae Genet 41:39–45Google Scholar
  4. Burdon RD (1997) Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest-tree breeding. Silvae Genet 26:168–175Google Scholar
  5. Cameron JN, Cotterill PP (1989) Coefficient of relationship for estimating individual heritability from open-pollinated Eucalypts with neighbourhood inbreeding. APM Forests Technical Report No. 89/9 (unpublished)Google Scholar
  6. Comstock RE, Moll RH (1963) Genotype-environment interactions. In: Hanson RE, Robinson HF (eds) Statistical genetics and plant breeding. NAS-NRC Pub 982, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickerson GE (1969) Techniques for research in quantitative animal genetics In: Techniques and procedures in animal science research. Am Soc Anim Sci, Albany, New York pp 36–79Google Scholar
  8. Eldridge K, Davidson J, Harwood C, van Wyk G (1993) Eucalypt domestication and breeding. Clarendon Press. Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffin AR, Cotterill PP (1988) Genetic variation in growth of outcrossed, selfed and open-pollinated progenies of Eucalyptus regnans and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genet 37:124–131Google Scholar
  10. Hardner CM, Potts BM (1995 a) Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genet (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Hardner CM, Potts BM (1995 b) The influence of mortality and stand age on the estimation of genetic parameters in Eucalyptus regnans. In: Potts BM, Borralho NMG, Reid JB, Cromer RN, Tibbits WN, Raymond CA (eds.) Eucalypt plantations: Improving fibre yield and quality. Proc. CRX-IUFRO Conf., Hobart, pp 208–211Google Scholar
  12. Hodge GR, White TL (1992) Genetic parameter estimates for growth traits at different ages in slash pine and some implications for breeding. Silvae Genet 41:252–262Google Scholar
  13. Huber DA (1993) Optimal mating designs and optimal techniques for analysis of quantitative traits in forest genetics. PhD dissertation, For Res Conserv, Univ Florida, Gainesville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  14. Kedharnath S (1982) Genetic variation and heritability of juvenile height growth in Eucalyptus grandis. J. Tree Sci 1:46–49Google Scholar
  15. Kedharnath S, Vakshasya RK (1978) Estimate of components of variance, heritability, and correlation among some growth parameters in Eucalyptus tereticornis. In: Third World Consultation on Forest Tree Breeding, Canberra, Australia, pp 667–676Google Scholar
  16. Lawes Agricultural Trust (1987) Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Moran GF, Bell JC (1983) Eucalyptus. In: Tanksley SD, Orton TJ (eds) Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding. Elsevier, Australia, pp 423–441Google Scholar
  18. Moran GF, Bell JC, Griffin AR (1989) Reduction in levels of inbreeding in a seed orchard of Eucalyptus regnans, F. Muell. compared with natural populations. Silvae Genet 38:32–36Google Scholar
  19. Namkoong G (1979) Introduction to quantitative genetics in forestry. USDA-FS Technical Bulletin No. 1588Google Scholar
  20. Patterson HD, Williams ER (1976) A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika 63:83–92Google Scholar
  21. Potts BM (1990) The response of eucalypt populations to a changing environment. Tasforests 2:179–193Google Scholar
  22. Potts BM, Jordan GJ (1994) Spatial pattern and scale of variation in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. ssp. globulus: variation in seedling abnormalities and early growth. Aust J Bot 42:471–492Google Scholar
  23. Potts BM, Saava M (1988) Self-incompatibility in Eucalyptus. In: Knox RB, Sing MB, Troiani LF, (eds) Pollination '88. Plant cell biology research centre, Melbourne, Australia, pp 165–170Google Scholar
  24. Potts BM, Saava M (1989) The crossability of Eucalyptus globulus. In: Gibson GL, Griffin AR, Matheson CA (eds) Breeding tropical trees: population structure and genetic improvement strategies in clonal and seedling forestry. Proc IUFRO Conf, Pattaya, Thailand. Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford England, pp 420–422Google Scholar
  25. Potts BM, Volker PW, Dungey HS (1992) Barriers to the production of hybrids in Eucalyptus. In: Mass production technology for genetically improved fast-growing forest tree species, AFOCELIUFRO Symposium, Bordeaux, France, pp 193–204Google Scholar
  26. SAS (1990) SAS/STAT User's Guide Version 6, Volume 2. SAS Institute, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  27. Squillace AE (1974) Average genetic correlation among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genet 23:149–156Google Scholar
  28. Sorenson FC, White TL (1987) Effect of natural inbreeding on variance structure in tests of wind-pollination Douglas-fir progenies. For Sci 34:102–118Google Scholar
  29. Stonecypher RW (1992) Computational methods. In: Fins L, Friedman ST, Brotschol JV (eds) Handbook of quantitative forest genetics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Netherlands, pp 195–228Google Scholar
  30. Visscher PM, Thompson R, Hill WG (1991) Estimation of genetic and environmental variances for fat yield in individual herds and an investigation into heterogeneity of variance between herds. Livestock Prod Sci 28:273–290Google Scholar
  31. Volker PW, Orme RK (1988) Provenance trials of Eucalyptus globulus and related species in Tasmania. Aust For 51:257–265Google Scholar
  32. Volker PW, Badcock K, Gore P (1988) Flowering patterns in multiprovenance seed orchards of Eucalyptus globulus. In: Proc. Research Working Group No.1 of the Australian Forestry Council, Forest Genetics. Australian Forestry Council, Canberra.Google Scholar
  33. Volker PW, Dean CA, Tibbits WN, Ravenwood IC (1990) Genetic parameters and gains expected from selection in Eucalyptus globulus in Tasmania. Silvae Genet 39:18–21Google Scholar
  34. White TL, Hodge GR (1989) Predicting breeding values with applications in forest-tree improvement. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  35. Whiteman PH, Dean CA, Doran JC, Cameron JN (1992) Genetic parameters and selection strategies for Eucalyptus nitens (Dean and Maiden) in Victoria. Silvae Genet 41:77–81Google Scholar
  36. Woolaston R, Whiteman PH, Cameron JN (1991a) Genetic analyses of 4-year diameter measures for Eucalyptus nitens growing across three sites in Victoria, Australia. In: Intensive forestry: the role of eucalypts. Proc IUFRO Symposium, Durban, South Africa, pp 361–370Google Scholar
  37. Woolaston R, Whiteman PH, Cameron JN (1991b) Genetic analyses of 4-year diameter measures for Eucalyptus globulus growing across four sites in Victoria, Australia. In: Intensive forestry: the role of eucalypts. Proc IUFRO Symposium, Durban, South Africa, pp 371–370Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. R. Hodge
    • 1
  • P. W. Volker
    • 2
  • B. M. Potts
    • 3
  • J. V. Owen
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.ANM Forest Managementew NorfolkAustralia
  3. 3.Co-operative Research Centre for Temperate Hardwood ForestrySandy BayAustralia
  4. 4.CSIRO Division of ForestryCanberra CityAustralia

Personalised recommendations