Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 90, Issue 7–8, pp 969–981 | Cite as

Locating genes associated with root morphology and drought avoidance in rice via linkage to molecular markers

  • M. C. Champoux
  • G. Wang
  • S. Sarkarung
  • D. J. Mackill
  • J. C. O'Toole
  • N. Huang
  • S. R. McCouch


This research was undertaken to identify and map quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with five parameters of rice root morphology and to determine if these QTLs are located in the same chromosomal regions as QTLs associated with drought avoidance/tolerance. Root thickness, root:shoot ratio, root dry weight per tiller, deep root dry weight per tiller, and maximum root length were measured in three replicated experiments (runs) of 203 recombinant inbred lines grown in a greenhouse. The lines were from a cross between indica cultivar Co39 andjaponica cultivar Moroberekan. The 203 RI lines were also grown in three replicated field experiments where they were drought-stressed at the seedling, early vegetative, and late-vegetative growth stage and assigned a visual rating based on leaf rolling as to their degree of drought avoidance/tolerance. The QTL analysis of greenhouse and field data was done using single-marker analysis (ANOVA) and interval analysis (Mapmaker QTL). Most QTLs that were identified were associated with root thickness, root/shoot ratio, and root dry weight per tiller, and only a few with deep root weight. None were reliably associated with maximum root depth due to genotype-by-experiment interaction. Root thickness and root dry weight per tiller were the characters found to be the least influenced by environmental differences between greenhouse runs. Correlations of root parameters measured in greenhouse experiments with field drought avoidance/tolerance were significant but not highly predictive. Twelve of the fourteen chromosomal regions containing putative QTLs associated with field drought avoidance/tolerance also contained QTLs associated with root morphology. Thus, selecting for Moroberekan alleles at marker loci associated with the putative root QTLs identified in this study may be an effective strategy for altering the root phenotype of rice towards that commonly associated with drought-resistant cultivars.

Key words

Drought, Rice QTL analysis Root morphology Molecular markers 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmadi N (1983) Variabilité génétique et héréditéde méchanismes de tolérance à la sécheresse chez le riz Oryza saliva L. I. Dévelopment du systéme racinaire. L'Agronomie Trop 38:10–117Google Scholar
  2. Ahn S, Anderson JA, Sorrells ME, Tanksley SD (1993) Homoeologous relationships of rice, wheat, and maize chromosomes. Mol Gen Genet 241:483–490Google Scholar
  3. Armenta-Soto JL, Chang TT, Loresto GC, O'Toole JC (1983) Genetic analysis of root characters in rice (Oryza sativa L.). SABRAO J 15:103–116Google Scholar
  4. Bhaduri PN, Ghosh M (1965) Excised embryo culturing: the study of inheritance of root types in rice. Bot Mag 78:348–352Google Scholar
  5. Causse M, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Wu K, Xiao J, Chunwongse J, Yu Z, Ronald PC, Harrington SB, Second GA, McCouch SR, Tanksley SD (1994) Saturated molecular map of the rice genome based on an interspecific backcross population. Genetics 138:1251–1274Google Scholar
  6. Chang TT, Armenta-Soto JL, Mao CX, Peris R, Loresto GC (1987) Genetic studies on the components of drought resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). In: IRRI (ed) Rice genetics. Int Rice Res Inst, Los Baños, Philippines, pp 387–398Google Scholar
  7. Chang TT, Loresto G, Tagumpay O (1972) Agronomic and growth characteristics of upland and lowland varieties. In: IRRI (ed) Rice breeding. Int Rice Res Inst, Los Baños, Philippines, pp 645–661Google Scholar
  8. Ekanayake IJ, Garrity DP, Masajo TM, O'Toole JC (1985a) Rootpulling resistance in rice: inheritance and association with drought resistance. Euphytica 34:905–913Google Scholar
  9. Ekanayake IJ, O'Toole JC, Garrity DP, Masajo TM (1985b) Inheritance of root characters and their relations to drought resistance in rice. Crop Sci 25:927–933Google Scholar
  10. Eshed Y, Abu-Abied M, Saranga Y, Zamir D (1992) Lycopersicon esculentum lines containing small overlapping introgressions from L. pendlii. Theor Appl Genet 84:1027–1034Google Scholar
  11. Ingram KT, Real JG, Maguling MA, Obien MA, Loresto GC (1990) Comparison of selection indices to screen lowland rice for drought resistance. Euphytica 48:253–260Google Scholar
  12. IRRI (1993) 1993–1995 IRRI Rice Almanac. Los Baños, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones CA, O'Toole JC (1987) Application of crop production models in agro-ecological characterization: simulation models for specific crops. In: Bunting AH (ed) Agricultural environments: characterization, classification and mapping. CAB International, UK, pp 199–209Google Scholar
  14. Jones JW, Zur B (1984) Simulation of possible adaptive mechanisms in crops subjected to water stress. Irrig Sci 5:251–264Google Scholar
  15. Jordan WR, Dugas WA, Shouse PJ (1983) Strategies for crop improvement for drought-prone regions. In: Stone JF, Willis WO (eds) Plant production and management under drought conditions. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 281–299Google Scholar
  16. Knott SA, Haley CS (1992) Aspects of maximum-likelihood methods for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in line crosses. Genet Res 60:139–159Google Scholar
  17. Kosambi DD, (1944) The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172–175Google Scholar
  18. Kurata N, Nagamura Y, Yamamoto K, Harushima Y, Sue N, Wu J, Antonio BA, Shomura A, Shimizu T, Lin SY, Inoue T, Fukuda A, Shimano T, Kuboki Y, Toyama T, Miyamoto Y, Kirihara T, Hayasaka K, Miyao A, Monna R, Zhong HS, Tamura Y, Wang ZX, Momma Y, Umehara Y, Yano M, Sasaki T, Minobe Y (1994) A 300 kilobase interval genetic map of rice including 883 expressed sequences. Nature Genetics 8:365–372Google Scholar
  19. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newburg L (1987) Mapmaker: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181Google Scholar
  20. Lincoln S, M Daly, Lander E (1992a) Mapping genes controlling quantitative traits with MAPMAKER/QTL 1.1. Whitehead Institute Technical Report. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
  21. Lincoln S, M Daly, Lander E (1992b) Constructing genetic maps with MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0. Whitehead Institute Technical Report. 3rd edn.Google Scholar
  22. Lorens GF, Bennet JM, Loggale LB (1987) Differences in drought resistance between two corn hybrids. I. Water relations and rootlength density. Agron J 79:802–807Google Scholar
  23. Ludlow MM, Muchow RC (1990) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv Agron 43:107–153Google Scholar
  24. Mambani B, Lal R (1983) Response of upland rice varieties to drought stress. I. Relation between root system development and leaf water potential. Plant and Soil 73:59–72Google Scholar
  25. Manly KF (1993) A Macintosh program for storage and analysis of experimental genetic mapping data. Mamm Genome 4:303–313Google Scholar
  26. Martin B, Nienhuis J, King G, Schaefer A (1989) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms associated with water use efficiency in tomato. Science 243:1725–1728Google Scholar
  27. McCouch SR, Kochert G, Yu ZH, Wang ZY, Khush GS, Coffman WR, Tanksley SD (1988) Molecular mapping of rice chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 76:815–829Google Scholar
  28. Muchow RC, Sinclair TR (1986) Water and nitrogren limitations in soybean grain production. II. Field and model analyses. Field Crops Res 15:143–156Google Scholar
  29. Oka HI (1964) Considerations on the genetic basis of intervarietal sterility in Oryza sativa. In: IRRI (ed) Rice genetics and cytogenetics. Symp on Rice Genet and Cytogenet, Manila. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 159–174Google Scholar
  30. Oka HI (1988) Origin of cultivated rice. Jpn Sci Soc Press. Elsevier, Tokyo AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. O'Toole JC, Soemartono (1981) Evaluation of a simple technique for characterizing rice root systems in relation to drought resistance. Euphytica 30:283–290Google Scholar
  32. Paterson A, Lander E, Lincoln S, Hewitt J, Peterson S, Tanksley S (1988) Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors using a complete RFLP linkage map. Nature 335:721–726Google Scholar
  33. Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD, Zamir D, Rabinowitch HD, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD (1991) Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127:181–197Google Scholar
  34. Reyniers FN, Binh T (1977) Screening with phosphorus 32 for rooting depth among varieties of rainfed rice. Paper presented at a Conference on Rice in Africa, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, March 7–11, 1977Google Scholar
  35. SAS Institute, Inc. (1988) SAS users guide: statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  36. Sato Y, Ishikawa R, Morishima H (1990) Nonrandom association of genes and characters found in indica x japonica hybrids of rice. Heredity 65:75–79Google Scholar
  37. Saito A, Yano M, Kishimoto N, Nakagahra M, Yoshimura A, Saito K, Kuhara S, Ukai Y, Kawase M, Nagamine T, Yoshimura S, Ideta O, Qhsawa R, Hayano Y, Iwata N, Sugiura M (1991) Linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphism loci in rice. Japan J Breed 41:665–670Google Scholar
  38. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132:823–839Google Scholar
  39. Tanksley SD (1993) Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet 27:205–233Google Scholar
  40. Turner NC, O'Toole JC, Cruz RT, Namuco OS, Ahmed S (1986) Response of seven diverse rice cultivars to water deficits. I. Stress develpment, canopy temperature, leaf rolling and growth. Field Crops Res 13:257–271Google Scholar
  41. Wang G, Mackill DJ, Bonman JM, McCouch SR, Champoux MC, Nelson RJ (1994) RFLP mapping of genes conferring complete and partial resistance to blast in a durably resistant rice cultivar. Genetics 136:1421–1434Google Scholar
  42. Widawsky DA, O'Toole JC (1990) Prioritizing the rice biotechnology research agenda for eastern India. The Rockefeller Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Wright GC, Smith RGC (1983) Differences between two grain sorghum genotypes in adaptation to drought stress. II. Root water uptake and water use. Aust J Agric Res 34:627–636Google Scholar
  44. Yoshida S, Hasegawa S (1982) The rice root system: its development and function. In: Drought resistance in crops with emphasis on rice. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp 97–114Google Scholar
  45. Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cook JH, Gomez KA (1976) Routine procedure for growing rice plants in culture solution. In: IRRI (ed) Laboratory manual for physiological studies for rice. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp 61–66Google Scholar
  46. Doerge RW (1993) Statistical methods for locating quantitative trait (3)loci using molecular markers. PhD Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  47. Mood AM, Graybill FA, Boes DC (1974) Introduction to the theory of statistics. McGraw-Hill, pp 495–497Google Scholar
  48. Morton NE (1955) Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet 7:227–318Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. C. Champoux
    • 1
  • G. Wang
    • 1
  • S. Sarkarung
    • 1
  • D. J. Mackill
    • 1
  • J. C. O'Toole
    • 2
  • N. Huang
    • 1
  • S. R. McCouch
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biochemistry DivisionInternational Rice Research InstituteManilaPhilippines
  2. 2.The Rockefeller FoundationBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations