Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp 70–74 | Cite as

Pedigree analysis for composing a core collection of modern cultivars, with examples from barley (Hordeum vulgare s. lat.)

  • T. J. L. van Hintum
  • D. Haalman
Article

Abstract

A method for analyzing the pedigrees of cultivars is developed that allows for the calculation of the ‘effective number of origin lines’ (n OL ). The n OL is defined as the average number of alleles, not identical by descent, per locus in a set of lines. Its relationship with the commonly used ‘coefficient of parentage’ is clarified. A related quantity, the ‘effective overlap of origin lines’ (r OL ) is defined as the average number of alleles, not identical by descent, per locus common in two sets of individuals. A set of 85 modern barley cultivars is used to illustrate the application of n OL and r OL . This set originated from 153 mutually unrelated ancestors. The degree to which each ancestor contributed was quantified, and the result was a n OL of only 43.1. In the set were 51 spring and 34 winter cultivars, with a n OL of 25.0 and 21.0, respectively. Consequently, the r OL of these two groups was 2.9, indicating that the two groups can be considered to be nearly distinct genetically since they have only 2.9 origin lines in common. How the effective number of origin lines can be used to create a core collection of cultivars with known pedigrees by maximizing the n OL in a set of cultivars of given size is also discussed.

Key words

Pedigree analysis Genetic diversity Core collections Genetic resources Hordeum vulgare 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arias G, Reiner L, Penger A, Mangstl A (1983) Directory of barley cultivars and lines. Technical University of Munich, Freising-WeihenstephanGoogle Scholar
  2. Baum BR, Bailey LG, Thompson BK (1985) Barley register. Publ no. 1783/B, Agriculture Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumer M, Goppel W (1988) Gerste. Sorten, Züchter, Ursprungsland, Zulassungsjahr, Abstammung. Bayerische Landesanstalt fur Bodenkultur und Pflanzenbau, Freising-Weihenstephan, March 1988Google Scholar
  4. Brown AHD (1989) Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31:818–824Google Scholar
  5. Cox TS, Kiang YT, Gorman MB, Rodgers DM (1985) Relationship between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity indices in the soybean. Crop Sci 25:529–532Google Scholar
  6. Cox TS, Murphy JP, Rodgers DM (1986) Changes in the genetic diversity in the red winter wheat region of the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5583–5586Google Scholar
  7. EBC (1991) Advances in malting barley (harvest 1990) SECR European Brewery Convention, Zoeterwoude, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. Frankel OH, Brown AHD (1984) Plant genetic resources today: a critical appraisal. In: Holden JHW, Williams JT (eds) Crop genetic resources: conservation and evaluation. George Allen and Unwin, London, pp 249–257Google Scholar
  9. Kempthorne O (1969) An introduction to genetic statistics. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  10. Knauft DA, Gorbet DW (1989) Genetic diversity among peanut cultivars. Crop Sci 29:1417–1422Google Scholar
  11. Linde-Laursen I, Doll H, Nielsen G (1982) Giemsa C-Banding patterns and some biochemical markers in a pedigree of European barley. Z Pflanzenzuecht 88:191–219Google Scholar
  12. Martin JM, Blake TK, Hockett EA (1991) Diversity among North American spring barley cultivars based on coefficients of parentage. Crop Sci 31:1131–1137Google Scholar
  13. NIAB (1989) Detailed descriptions of varieties of wheat, barley, oats, rye and triticale. National Institute of Agricultural Botany, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith OS, Smith JSC, Bowen SL, Tenborg RA, Wall SJ (1990) Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80:833–840Google Scholar
  15. Souza E, Sorrells ME (1989) Pedigree analysis of North American oat cultivars released from 1951 to 1985. Crop Sci 29:595–601Google Scholar
  16. Souza E, Sorrells ME (1991) Relationships among 70 North American oat germplasms: 2. cluster analysis using qualitative characters. Crop Sci 31:605–612Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. J. L. van Hintum
    • 1
  • D. Haalman
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Genetic Resources, the NetherlandsCentre for Plant Breeding and Reproduction Research (CPRO-DLO)AA WageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations