Quality and Quantity

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 1–32 | Cite as

Why soldiers fight. Part I. Leadership, cohesion and fighter spirit

  • Robert B. Smith


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, Karl L., Reilly, Thomas W. and Fennessey, James (1981). “Issues in instrumental variables analysis”, American Sociological Review 46: 937–941.Google Scholar
  2. Back, Kurt (1950). “The exertion of influence through social communications”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46: 92–99.Google Scholar
  3. Barnard, Chester I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berkowitz, Leonard (1954). “Group standards, cohesiveness and productivity”, Human Relations 27: 509–519.Google Scholar
  5. Blau, Peter M. (1960). “Structural effects”, American Sociological Review 25: 178–193.Google Scholar
  6. Coleman, James S. (1964). Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, James S., ed. (1971). Sociological Methodology 1970. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Cramer, James C. (1980). “Fertility and female employment: problems of causal direction”, American Sociological Review 45: 167–190.Google Scholar
  9. Cramer, James C. (1981). “Instrumental variables analysis”, American Sociological Review 46: 942.Google Scholar
  10. Daniels, H.E. (1944). “The relation between measures of correlation in the universe of sample permutations”, Biometrika 33: 129–135.Google Scholar
  11. Dayan, Moshe (1967). A Diary of the Sinai Campaign. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
  12. Duncan, Otis D. (1975). Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, Otis D., Haller, Archibald O. and Portes, Alejandro, 1968. “Peer influences on aspirations: a reinterpretation”, American Journal of Sociology 74: 119–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Egbert, Robert L., et al. (1957). “Fighter I: an analysis of combat fighters and nonfighters”, Technical Report No. 44, Human Resources Research Office, George Washington University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Etzioni, Amitai (1975). A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Farago, Ladislas, ed. (1942). German Psychological Warface. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  17. Frank, Jerome (1974). Persuasion and Healing. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  18. Freud, Sigmund (trans. James Strachey) (1959). Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Gabriel, Richard A. and Savage, Paul L. (1978). Crisis in Command: Mismanagement in the Army. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  20. Homans, George (1961). Social Behavior: its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  21. Janowitz, Morris (1960). The Professional Soldier. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Janowitz, Morris (in collaboration with Roger Little) (1965). Sociology and the Military Establishment. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Janowitz, Morris (1971). The Professional Soldier. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Keegan, John (1977). The Face of Battle. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  25. Land, Kenneth and Felson, Marcus (1978). “Sensitivity analysis of arbitrarily indentified simultaneous-equation models”, Sociological Methods and Research 6: 28305.Google Scholar
  26. Lang, Kurt (1980). “American military performance in Vietnam: background and analysis”, Journal of Political and Military Sociology 8.Google Scholar
  27. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Pasanella, Anne and Rosenberg, Morris (1972). Continuities in the Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Little, R.W. (1964). “Buddy relations and combat performance”, in M.Janowitz, ed., The New Military. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Merton, Robert K. and Lazarsfeld, Paul F. (1950). Continuities in Social Research: The American Soldier. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Meyers, S.M. and Biderman, A.D., eds., 1968. Mass Behaviour in Battle and Captivity: The Communist Soldier in the Korean War. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Moskos, Charles C. (1970). The American Enlisted Man. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Moskos, Charles C. (1975). “The American combat soldier in Vietnam”, Journal of Social Issues 31: 25–37.Google Scholar
  33. Moskos, Charles C. (1976). “The Military”, Annual Review of Sociology 2: 55–77.Google Scholar
  34. Moskos, Charles C. (1980). “Surviving the war in Vietnam”, in Charles R.Figley and SeymourLeventman, eds., Stranger at Home: Vietnam Veterans Since the War. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  35. Ouchi, William G. (1981). Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  36. Selvin, Hanan (1960). The Effects of Leadership. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Shachter, Stanley, Ellertson, N., McBride, D. and Gregory, D. (1960). “An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity”, pp. 152–162 in D.Cartwright and A.Zander, eds. Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. 2nd edn. Evanston: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  38. Shils, Edward A. and Janowitz, Morris (1968). “Cohesion and disintegration in the Whehrmacht in World War II”, Public Opinion Quarterly 12: 280–315.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, Robert B. (1973). Why Soldiers Fight. Cambridge, MA: Social Structural Research Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, Robert B. (1974). “Continuities in ordinal path analysis”, Social Forces 53: 200–229.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, Robert B. (1977a). “Proportional reduction in error interpretations for Daniels' T2 and its special cases”, Social Forces 55: 1067–1075.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, Robert B. (1977b). “Proportional reduction in error interpretations for the squared generalized multiple, partial and multiple-partial correlation coefficients and their special cases”, Social Forces 56: 668–702.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, Robert B. (1981). “Generalized pairwise semipartial correlation, commonalities analysis and path analysis: some PRE interpretations and convergences”, Quality and Quantity 15: 279–303.Google Scholar
  44. Stokes, Donald E. (1970). “Compound paths in political analysis”, Mathematical Applications in Political Science 5.Google Scholar
  45. Stouffer, Samuel A., Suchman, Edward A., DeVinney, Leland C., Starr, Shirley A. and Williams, Robin M.Jr. (1949). The American Soldier. Vol. I. Adjustment During Army Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Stouffer, Samuel A., Lumsdaine, Arthur A., Lumsdaine, Marion Harper, Williams, Robin M.Jr., Brewster-Smith, M., Janis, Irving L., Starr, Shirley A. and Cottrell, Leonard S.Jr. (1949). The American Soldiers. Vol. II. Combat and Its Aftermath. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert B. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Structural Research Inc.CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations