Quality and Quantity

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 1–16

Conceptual structures as damped harmonic oscillators

  • John Foldy
  • Joseph Woelfel
Article

Abstract

This paper serves to examine certain hypotheses about the effect of information on cognitive processing generated by the Galileo model. This model proposes that objects of cognition are points within a multidimensional continuum, the definition of any object being its structural relation to all other objects in the continuum, and any change in structure can be modeled by Newtonian mechanics. This paper tests the hypothesis that new information will induce motion described by the equation for a damped harmonic oscillator, and that regions of the continuum where information is not directed will display motion as described by DeBroglie's equation. Results tentatively support the hypotheses, and the relation of this conceptualization with compatible models of physical reality is discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, G.A., Serota, K. & Taylor, J. (1976). “Campaign communication and attitude change: a multidimensional analysis”, Human Communication Research 2(3): 227–244.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, G.A. & Woelfel, J.D. (1979). “On the dimensionality of psychological processes”, Quality & Quantity 13: 214–232.Google Scholar
  3. Boehm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  4. Cody, M. (1980). ”The validity of experimentally induced motions of public figures in a multidimensional scaling configurtion”, in D.Nimmo (ed.), Communication Yearbook (vol. 4). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transactior Books.Google Scholar
  5. Cody, M. Marlier, J. & Woelfel, J. (1976). “An Application of the Multiple Attribute Measurement Model: Measurements and Manipulation of Source Credibility”, paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Mathematical Psychological Association, Lafayette, Ind., 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Craig, R. (1977). “Limiting the scope of the spatial model of communication effects”, Human Communication Research 3(4): 309–325.Google Scholar
  7. Durkheim, E. (1966). The Rules of Sociological Method, S. Solovay (trans.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kincaid, D.L. (1980). “The convergence model of communication”, Communication Institute Monograph, No. 18, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  9. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mach (1942). The Science of Mechanics (5th English edn), LaSalle, Ill: Opn Court.Google Scholar
  11. Mead, G.H. (1934), Mind, Self, and Society, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Prigogine, I. (1980). From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  13. Woelfel, J. D. & Fink, E. L. (1980). The Measurement of Communication Processes: Galileo Theory and Method. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Woelfel, J., Cody, M., Bilham, J. & Holmes, R. (1980). Basic premises of attitude change theory”, Human Communication Research 1980 (2): 153–168.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Foldy
    • 1
  • Joseph Woelfel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Rhetoric and CommunicationUniversity of California at DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.S.U.N.Y.AlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations