Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 90, Issue 1, pp 11–16 | Cite as

Nuclear DNA content of Vitis species, cultivars, and other genera of the Vitaceae

  • M. A. Lodhi
  • B. I. Reisch
Article

Abstract

The nuclear DNA content was analyzed in Vitis species, hybrid cultivars, and genera of the Vitaceae using flow cytometry. Significant variation was found among Vitis species, hybrids, and other genera of the Vitaceae (Ampelopsis and Parthenocissus). DNA content was estimated to range from 0.98 to 1.05 pg/2C within V. labrusca (ns) and 0.86 to 1.00 pg/2C within V. vinifera (ns). Genotypes from Vitis and Parthenocissus were similar in nuclear DNA content (approximately 1.00 pg/2C) whereas they differed significantly from Ampelopsis (1.39 pg/2C). No correlation between DNA content and the center of origin of genotypes of the Vitaceae was noted. Based on the present study, the Vitis genome size is 475 Mbp, 96% of which is non-coding. Knowledge of DNA content is useful in order to understand the complexity of the Vitis genome and to establish a relationship between the genetic and physical map for map-based cloning.

Key words

Ampelopsis Flow cytometry Grapevines Parthenocissus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alleweldt G, Possingham JV (1988) Progress in grapeving breeding. Theor Appl Genet 75:669–673Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1993) FAO Production Year Book, vol 46. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991a) Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9:208–219Google Scholar
  4. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991b) Estimation of nuclear DNA content by flow cytometry. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9:229–241Google Scholar
  5. Bachmann K, Price HJ (1977) Repetitive DNA in Cichorieae (Compositae). Chromosoma 61:267–275Google Scholar
  6. Bennett MD (1972) Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc R Soc Lond B181:109–135Google Scholar
  7. Bennett MD (1985) Intraspecific variation in DNA amount and the nucleotypic dimension in plant genetics. In: Freeling M (ed) Plant genetics. A. R. Liss, New York, pp 283–302Google Scholar
  8. Bennett MD (1987) Variation in genomic form in plants and its ecological implications. New Phytol 106:177–200Google Scholar
  9. Bennett MD, Smith JB (1976) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B274:227–274Google Scholar
  10. Bennett MD, Gustafson JP, Smith JB (1977) Variation in nuclear DNA in the genus Secale. Chromosoma 61:149–176Google Scholar
  11. Bennett MD, Smith JB, Ward JP, Finch RA (1982) The relationship between chromosome volume and DNA content in unsquashed metaphase cells of barley, Hordeum vulgare cv Tullen 346. J Cell Sci 56:101–111Google Scholar
  12. Bhaskaran S, Swaminathan MS (1960) Metaphase chromosome length and DNA content in relation to polyploidy in Triticum species. Exp Cell Res 20:598–599Google Scholar
  13. Cavallini A, Natali L, Cionini G, Gennai D (1993) Nuclear DNA variability within Pisum sativum (Leguminosae): nucleotypic effects on plant growth. Heredity 70:561–565Google Scholar
  14. Ceccarelli M, Falistocco E, Cionini PG (1992) Variation in genome size and organization within hexaploid Festuca arundinaceae. Theor Appl Genet 83:271–278Google Scholar
  15. Costich DE, Ortiz R, Meagher TR, Bruederle LP, Vorsa N (1993) Determination of ploidy level and nuclear DNA content in blue-berry by flow cytometry. Theor Appl Genet 86:1001–1006Google Scholar
  16. Cullis CA (1990) DNA rearrangements in response to environmental stress. Adv Genet 28:73–97Google Scholar
  17. Dickson EE, Arumuganathan K, Kresovich S, Doyle JJ (1992) Nuclear DNA content variation within the Rosaceae. Am J Bot 79:1081–1086Google Scholar
  18. Figueira A, Janick J, Goldsbrough P (1992) Genome size and DNA polymorphism in Theobroma cacao. J Am Soc Hort Sci 117:673–677Google Scholar
  19. Flavell RB (1980) The molecular characterization and organization of plant chromosomal DNA sequences. Annu Rev Pl Physiol 31:569–596Google Scholar
  20. Flavell RB (1985) Repeated sequences and genome change. In: Hohn B, Dennis ES (eds) Genetic flux in plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 139–156Google Scholar
  21. Flavell RB (1986) Repetitive DNA and chromosome evolution in plants. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B312:227–242Google Scholar
  22. Flavell RB, Dean C, Moore G (1993a) Exploiting plant genomes, small and large. In: Heslop-Harrison JS, Flavell RB (eds) The chromosome. BIOS Scientific Publishers, UK, pp 249–264Google Scholar
  23. Flavell RB, Gale MD, O'Dell M, Lucas H, Murphy G, Moore G (1993b) Molecular organization of genes and repeats in the large cereal genomes and implications for isolation of genes by chromosome walking. In: Chandley A, Sumner A (eds) Chromosomes today, Vol 11. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 199–213Google Scholar
  24. Furuta Y, Nishikawa K (1991) Variation in nuclear and individual chromosomal DNA content and its role in evolution of plants. In: Gupta PK, Tsuchiya T (eds) Chromosome engineering in plants: genetics, breeding and evolution, Part A. Elsevier, New York, pp 71–86Google Scholar
  25. Furuta Y, Nishikawa K, Makino T, Sawai Y (1984) Variation in DNA content of 21 individual chromosomes among six subspecies in common wheat. Jpn J Genet 59:83–90Google Scholar
  26. Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049–1051Google Scholar
  27. Galet P (1988) Cépages et vignobles de France, Tome 1. Les vignes Américaines, 2nd edn. Imprimerie Charles Déhan, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  28. Grime JP (1990) Ecological effects of climate change on plant populations and vegetation composition with particular reference to the British flora. In: Jackson M, Ford-Lloyd BV, Parry ML (eds) Climatic changes and plant genetic resources. Belhaven Press, London, pp 40–60Google Scholar
  29. Grime JP, Mowforth MA (1982) Variation in genome size-an ecological interpretation. Nature 299:151–153Google Scholar
  30. Grueilhuber J, Septa F (1985) Geographical variation of genome size at low taxonomic levels in Scilla bifolia alliance (Hyacinthaceae). Flora 176:431–438Google Scholar
  31. Hain R, Reif HJ, Krause E, Langbartels R, Kindle H, Vornam B, Wiese W, Schmelzer E, Schreier PH, Stöcker RH, Stenzel K (1993) Disease resistance results from foreign phytoalexin expression in a novel plant. Nature 361:153–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hammatt N, Blackhall NW, Davey MR (1991) Variation in the DNA content of Glycine spp. J Exp Bot 42:659–666Google Scholar
  33. Hébert D, Kikkert JR, Smith FD, Reisch BI (1993) Optimization of biolistic transformation of embryogenie grape-cell suspensions. Plant Cell Rep 12:585–589Google Scholar
  34. Hutchinson J, Rees H, Seal AG (1979) An assay of the activity of supplementary DNA in Lolium. Heredity 43:507–509Google Scholar
  35. Jones RN, Brown LM (1976) Chromosomal evolution and DNA variation in Crepis. Heredity 36:613–641Google Scholar
  36. Kenton A (1984) Chromosomal evolution in the Gibasis linearis group (Commelinaceae). III. DNA variation, chromosomal evolution and speciation in G. venustula and G. heterophylla. Chromosoma 90:303–310Google Scholar
  37. Lapitan NLV (1992) Organization and evolution of higher plant nuclear genomes. Genome 35:171–181Google Scholar
  38. Lodhi MA, Reisch BI, Weeden NF (1993) Molecular genetic mapping of the Vitis genome (abstract). Am J Enol Vitic 44:469Google Scholar
  39. Lodhi MA, Reisch BI, Weeden NF(1994) Genetic linkage maps of Vitis and QTL detection by interval mapping (abstract). Plant Genome II Conference, 24–27 January 1994 San Diego, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  40. Lukaszewski AJ, Wozna J, Apolinarska B, Naganowska B (1982) The DNA content of the individual chromosomes of rye. Theor Appl Genet 62:145–148Google Scholar
  41. Martin GB, Brommonschenkel SH, Chunwongse J, Frary A, Ganal MW, Spivey R, Wu T, Earle ED, Tanksley SD (1993) Map-based cloning of a protein kinase gene conferring disease resistance in tomato. Science 262:1432–1436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Martison VA (1975) Cytological studies of diploid and tetraploid Theobroma cacao. Genetica 45:341–348Google Scholar
  43. Mukherjee S, Sharma AK (1990) Mitotic cell duration and its relationship with nuclear DNA content, chromosome number and size and rate of growth in species of Acacia growing under stress. Ind J Exp Biol 28:508–510Google Scholar
  44. Mukherhee S, Sharma AK (1993) In situ nuclear DNA content in perennial fast and slow growing Acacias from arid zones. Cytobios 75:33–36Google Scholar
  45. Narayan RKJ (1991) Molecular organisation of the plant genome: its relation to structure, recombination and the evolution of chromosomes. J Genet 70:43–61Google Scholar
  46. Narayan RKJ, Rees H (1976) Nuclear DNA variation in Lathyrus. Chromosoma 54:141–154Google Scholar
  47. Narayan RKJ, Rees H (1977) Nuclear DNA divergence among Lathyrus species. Chromosoma 63:101–107Google Scholar
  48. Nishikawa K, Futura Y, Endo H (1979) Consideration of chromosome evolution on the basis of nuclear DNA content and total chromosome length in Lycoris. Jpn J Genet 54:387–396Google Scholar
  49. Parida A, Raina SN, Narayan RJK (1990) Quantitative DNA variation between and within chromosome complements of Vigna spp. (Fabaceae). Genetica 82:125–134Google Scholar
  50. Poggio L, Hunzikar JH (1986) Nuclear DNA content variation in Bulnesia. J Hered 77:43–48Google Scholar
  51. Price HJ (1976) Evolution of DNA content in higher plants. Bot Rev 42:27–52Google Scholar
  52. Price HJ (1988) DNA variation among higher plants. Ann Mis Bot Gard 75:1248–1257Google Scholar
  53. Price HJ, Chambers KL, Bachmann K, Riggs J (1983) Inheritance of nuclear 2C DNA content variation in intraspecific and interspecific hybrids of Microseris (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 70:1133–1138Google Scholar
  54. Rajasekaran K, Mullins MG (1983) The origin of embryos and plantlets from cultured anthers of hybrid grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 34:108–113Google Scholar
  55. Rao VLK, Sharma AK (1987) Amount of DNA and genotype differences in Hordeum. Cytologia 52:593–598Google Scholar
  56. Rayburn AL, Price HJ, Smith JD, Gold JR (1985) C-band heterochromatin and DNA content in Zea mays. Am J Bot 72:1610–1617Google Scholar
  57. Rayburn AL, Auger JA, Benzinger EA, Hepburn AG (1989) Detection of intraspecific DNA content variation in Zea mays L. by flow cytometry. J Exp Bot 40:1179–1183Google Scholar
  58. Rayburn AL, Biradar DP, Bullock DG, McMurphy LM (1993) Nuclear DNA content F1 hybrids of maize. Heredity 70:294–300Google Scholar
  59. SAS Institute (1985) SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Saurer W, Antcliff AJ (1969) Polyploid mutants in grapes. Hort-Science 4:226–227Google Scholar
  61. Shetty BV (1959) Cytotaxonomical studies in Vitaceae. Biblio Genet XVIII:167–272Google Scholar
  62. Sims LE, Price HJ (1985) Nuclear DNA content variation in Helianthus (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 72:1213–1219Google Scholar
  63. Srivastava S, Lavania UC (1991) Evolutionary DNA variation in Papaver. Genome 34:763–768Google Scholar
  64. Stein DB, Thompson WF, Belford HS (1979) Studies on DNA sequences in Osmundaceae. J Mol Evol 13:215–232Google Scholar
  65. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, de Vicente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB, Messeguer R, Miller JC, Miller L, Paterson AH, Pineda O, Röder MS, Wing RA, Wu W, Young ND (1992) High-density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:1141–1160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Tesniére CM, Romieu C, Vayda ME (1993) Changes in gene expression of grapes in response to hypoxia. Am J Enol Vitic 44:445–451Google Scholar
  67. Thomas MR, Matsumoto S, Cain P, Scott NS (1993) Repetitive DNA of grapevine: classes present and sequences suitable for cultivar identification. Theor Appl Genet 86:173–180Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Lodhi
    • 1
  • B. I. Reisch
    • 1
  1. 1.Departmet of Horticultural Sciences, New York State Agricultural Experiment StationCornell UniversityGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations