Transportation

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 127–146 | Cite as

Reflections on citizen involvement in urban transportation planning: Towards a positive approach

  • Wilbur A. Steger

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore an important and unique role which community participation and involvement can play in a revised transportation planning process. A review of diverse views about community participation, as well as a critique of the current urban transportation planning process, reveals that the former has played, primarily, ad hoc opportunistic and diverse roles, and that the latter is in desperate need for dynamic, subjective, “impact” information — required to assess attractive transportation systems. The contributions of several disciplines — economics, operations research, management science, political science, public administration, and others — are reviewed to assist in the development of a conceptual framework for a new community participation role, as a provider of key information to the planning process. An eclectic, experimental approach is recommended to explore the possibilities further.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, J. E. (1971). “People Involvement: Participation to Restore Confidence,” Public Mangement, p. 11.Google Scholar
  2. Boyce, Day and McDonald (1968). Metropolitan Plan Making, prepared for the U.S. Federal Highway Administration.Google Scholar
  3. Chidambaram, T. S. (1970). “Game Theoretic Analysis of a Problem of Government of People,” Management Science, pp. 542–559.Google Scholar
  4. CONSAD Research Corporation, (1971), A Study and Provision of Technical Assistance Through Simulation for More Effective Citizen Participation in the Model Cities Program.Google Scholar
  5. Garrison, W. L., and Worrall, R. D. (1966), Monitoring Urban Travel, (Department of Civil Engineering and the Transportation Center, Northwestern University), p. 1.Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton, C. S. (1964). “Monitor System for Urban Planning” in Clark Rogers, ed., Urban Information Systems and Policy Decision, (Knowledge Availability Systems Center, University: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), p. 23.Google Scholar
  7. Jesseman, W. C., Brussee, R., Tummika, A., and Brand, D., (1967). “A Rational Decision-Making Technique for Transportation Planning,” Highway Research Record, No. 180.Google Scholar
  8. Lowrey, R. A. and Lakshmanan, T. R. (1971). “Public Perceptions of Modern Mass Transportation Programs: A Progress Report,” American Institute of Planners Conference, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  9. Marschak, J. (1968). “The Economics of Inquiring, Communicating, and Deciding,” University of California, Working Paper No. 134.Google Scholar
  10. May, J. V. (197 1). “Citizen Participation: A Review of the Literature,” Council of Planning Librarians Exchange Bibliography, 210, 211.Google Scholar
  11. Mickle, D. G. (1971). “The Highway Research Board: New Horizons at Age 50,” Traffic Quarterly, pp. 153, 163.Google Scholar
  12. Mogolof, M. B. (1970). “Citizen Participation: A Review and Commentary on Federal Policies and Practices,” Urban Institute Paper 102-1, pp. 2, 93.Google Scholar
  13. Schimpler, C. C. (1968). “System Evaluation: An Approach Based on Community Structure and Values,” presented at the 47th HRB Meetings.Google Scholar
  14. Stanford Research Institute (1968). “Methods of Evaluation of the Effects of Transportation Systems on Community Values,” prepared for the Department of Housing and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  15. U.S. Department of Transportation (1971). A Statement on National Transportation Policy, p. 36.Google Scholar
  16. Wickstrom, G. V. and Pisarski, A. E. (1969). “The Use of Longitudinal Information Systems for ‘Continuing’ Urban Transportation Planning” in Urban and Regional Information Systems: Service Systems for Cities, Papers from the Seventh Annual Conference of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, p. 382.Google Scholar
  17. Worrall, R. D. (1967). “The Urban Panel and the Longitudinal Data Sources,” presented at the 46th HRB Meetings.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilbur A. Steger
    • 1
  1. 1.CONSAD Research CorporationPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations