Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 253–267 | Cite as

Calculation and uncertainty analysis of 210Pb dates for PIRLA project lake sediment cores

  • Michael W. Binford


Lead-210 assay and dating are subject to several sources of error, including natural variation, the statistical nature of measuring radioactivity, and estimation of the supported fraction. These measurable errors are considered in calculating confidence intervals for 210Pb dates. Several sources of error, including the effect of blunders or misapplication of the mathematical model, are not included in the quantitative analysis. First-order error analysis and Monte Carlo simulation (of cores from Florida PIRLA lakes) are used as independent estimates of dating uncertainty. CRS-model dates average less than 1% older than Monte Carlo median dates, but the difference increases non-linearly with age to a maximum of 11% at 160 years. First-order errors increase exponentially with calculated CRS-model dates, with the largest 95% confidence interval in the bottommost datable section being 155±90 years, and the smallest being 128±8 years. Monte Carlo intervals also increase exponentially with age, but the largest 95% occurrence interval is 152±44 years. Confidence intervals calculated by first-order methods and ranges of Monte Carlo dates agree fairly well until the 210Pb date is about 130 years old. Older dates are unreliable because of this divergence. Ninety-five per cent confidence intervals range from about 1–2 years at 10 years of age, 10–20 at 100 years, and 8–90 at 150 years old.

Key words

paleolimnology PIRLA 210Pb dating error analysis uncertainty constant-rate-of-supply model constant-flux model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ApplebyP. G. & F.Oldfield, 1978. The calculation of lead-210 dates assuming a constant rate of supply of unsupported 210Pb to the sediment. Catena 5: 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. ApplebyP. G. & F.Oldfield, 1983. Assessment of 210Pb from sites with varying sediment accumulation rates. Hydrobiologia 103: 29–35.Google Scholar
  3. Backman, A. E., 1984. 1000 year record of fire-vegetation interactions in the northeastern U.S. M.S. thesis, University of Massachusetts, 99 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Benninger, L. K., D. M. Lewis & K. K. Turekian, 1975. The use of natural 210Pb as a heavy metal tracer in the river-estuarine system. In: T. M. Church (ed.), Marine Chemistry and the Coastal Environment. American Chemical Society, Symposium Series, No. 18. pp. 201–210.Google Scholar
  5. BenoitG. & H. F.Hemond, 1987. A biogeochemical mass balance of 210Po and 210Pb in an oligotrophic lake with seasonally anoxic hypolimnion. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51: 1445–1456.Google Scholar
  6. Binford, M. W., 1986. 210Pb dates and their uncertainties for PIRLA cores. Final Report to Indiana University. Unpublished EPRI Report.Google Scholar
  7. BinfordM. W. & M.Brenner, 1986. Dilution of 210Pb by organic sedimentation in lakes of different trophic states, and application to studies of sediment-water interactions. Limnol. Oceanogr 31: 584–595.Google Scholar
  8. Binford, M. W., J. S. Kahl & S. A. Norton, in preparation Sedimentary 210Pb inventories, profiles, dates, and controlling factors in PIRLA project lakes. J. Paleolimnology.Google Scholar
  9. CharlesD. F. & D. R.Whitehead, 1986. The PIRLA project: paleoecological investigations of recent lake acidification. Hydrobiologia 143: 13–20.Google Scholar
  10. DavisAndrew O., James N.Galloway & D. KirkNordstrom, 1982. Lake acidification: Its effect on lead in the sediment of two Adirondack lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 163–167.Google Scholar
  11. DillonP. J., P. J.Scholer & H. E.Evans, 1987. 210Pb fluxes in acidified lakes. In: P. G.Sly (ed.), Sediments and Water Interactions. Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 491–499.Google Scholar
  12. GoldbergE. D., 1963. Geochronology with 210Pb. In: Radioactive Dating. Int. Atom. Energy Ag. Vienna: 121–131.Google Scholar
  13. Meyer, S. L., 1975. Data Analysis for Scientists and Engineers. Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. MostellerF. & J. W.Tukey, 1977. Data analysis and regression: A second course in statistics. Addison Wesley Publ. Co., Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  15. NortonS. A., C. T.Hess, G. M.Blake, M. L.Morrison & J.Baron, 1985. Excess unsupported 210Pb in lake sediment from Rocky Mountain lakes: A groundwater effect. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 42: 1249–1254.Google Scholar
  16. OldfieldF. & P. G.Appleby, 1984. Empirical testing of 210Pb models for lake sediments. In: E. Y.Haworth & J. W. G.Lund (eds.), Lake Sediments and Environmental History: Studies in Palaeolimnology and Palaeocology in honour of Winifred Tutin. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. pp. 93–124.Google Scholar
  17. ReckhowK. H. & S. C.Chapra, 1983. Engineering Approaches for Lake Management, Vol. 1: Data Analysis and Empirical Modeling. butterworth, Boston. 340 pages.Google Scholar
  18. RobbinsJ. A., 1978. Geochemical and geophysical applications of radioactive lead. In: J. O.Nriagu (ed.), Biogeochemistry of Lead in the Environment. Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam. pp. 285–393.Google Scholar
  19. SAS Institute, 1985. SAS User's Guide: Basics, Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C. 1292 pages.Google Scholar
  20. SmithW. H. & T. G.Siccama, 1981. The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: biogeochemistry of lead in the northern hardwood forest. J. envir. Qual. 10: 323–332.Google Scholar
  21. StillerM. & D. M.Imboden, 1987. 210Pb in Lake Kinneret waters and sediments: Residence times and fluxes. In: P. G.Sly (ed.), Sediments and Water Interactions. Springer-Verlag. New York. pp. 501–511.Google Scholar
  22. StillerM. & A.Kaufman, 1984. Lead-210 and Polonium-210 during the destruction of stratification in the Dead Sea. Earth Planet. Sci. Letts. 71: 390–404.Google Scholar
  23. TurekianK. K., Y.Nozaki & L.Benninger, 1977. Geochemistry of atmospheric radon and products. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 5: 227–255.Google Scholar
  24. TurekianK. K., L. K.Benninger & E. P.Dion, 1983. 7Be and 210Pb total deposition fluxes at New Haven, Connecticut and at Bermuda. J. geophys. Res. 88(C9): 5411–5415.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael W. Binford
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of DesignHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations