Cell and Tissue Research

, Volume 258, Issue 3, pp 527–539 | Cite as

Collagen and proteoglycan in a sea urchin ligament with mutable mechanical properties

  • John A. Trotter
  • Thomas J. Koob
Article

Summary

The “problematic ligament” of sea urchins is a connective tissue which crosses the ball-and-socket joint between spine and body wall. The problem of this ligament is that it is composed of parallel collagen fibrils, yet normally undergoes rapid and dramatic alterations in mechanical properties and in length. Previous work has suggested that the collagen fibrils of the ligament are able to slide past one another during length changes but are inhibited from sliding when the ligament is in “catch”. In this model of the ligament both the collagen fibrils and the interfibrillar matrix are mechanically important. We have found that the collagen fibrils of the spine ligament of the pencil urchin Eucidaris tribuloides are discontinuous and end by tapering within the body of the ligament. Intact fibrils that have been isolated from the ligament vary by more than an order of magnitude in length and in radius but have a constant length/radius (aspect) ratio of about 5300. This is the first determination of the aspect ratio of collagen fibrils from any source. The constant aspect ratio of the fibrils is consistent with their functioning as the discontinuous fiber phase in a fiber-reinforced composite material, while the high value of the aspect ratio indicates that the nonfibrillar matrix, which must act to transfer stress between fibrils, can produce a stiff and strong ligament even if it is several orders of magnitude weaker and more compliant than the fibrils. Moreover, the tensile properties of the ligament may be determined by the properties of the matrix. A prominent component of the interfibrillar matrix is a proteoglycan which associates with specific bands at the surface of the collagen fibrils through noncovalent binding of its core protein. The glycosaminoglycan moiety of this proteoglycan is partly comprised of chondroitin sulfate/dermatan sulfate polymers. These results are consistent with the “sliding fibril” hypothesis and suggest that the proteoglycan may be an important component of the stress-transfer matrix.

Key words

Ligament, composite Collagen Proteoglycans Aspect ratio Catch apparatus Eucidaris tribuloides (Echinodermata) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey AJ (1985) The collagen of the Echinodermata. In: Bairati A, Garrone R (eds) Biology of invertebrate and lower vertebrate collagens. Plenum Press, New York, pp 369–388Google Scholar
  2. Bailey AJ, Gathercole LJ, Duglosz J, Keller A, Voyle CA (1982) Proposed resolution of the paradox of extensive crosslinking and low tensile strength of cuvierian tubule collagen from the sea cucumber Holothuria forskali. Int J Biol Macromol 4:329–334Google Scholar
  3. Bennett MB, Ker RF, Dimery NJ, Alexander RMcN (1986) Mechanical properties of various mammalian tendons. J Zool 209:537–548Google Scholar
  4. Cassaro CMF, Dietrich CP (1977) Distribution of sulfated mucopolysaccharides in invertebrates. J Biol Chem 252:2254–2261Google Scholar
  5. Chapman JA, Hulmes DJS (1984) Electron microscopy of the collagen fibril. In: Ruggeri A, Motta PM (eds) Ultrastructure of the connective tissue matrix. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  6. Diab M, Gilly WF (1984) Mechanical properties and control of non-muscular catch in spine ligaments of the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. J Exp Biol 111:155–170Google Scholar
  7. Dietrich HF, Fontaine AR (1975) A decalcification method for ultrastructure of echinoderm tissues. Stain Technol 50:351–354Google Scholar
  8. Fisher LW, Termine JD, Dejter SW, Whitson SW, Yanigishita M, Kimura JH, Hascall VC, Kleinman H, Hassell JR, Nilsson B (1983) Proteoglycans of developing bone. J Biol Chem 258:6588–6594Google Scholar
  9. Hardingham TE (1981) Proteoglycans: their structure, interactions and molecular organization in cartilage. Biochem Soc Trans 9:489–497Google Scholar
  10. Hidaka M (1983) Effects of certain physico-chemical agents on the mechanical properties of the catch apparatus of the sea urchin spine. J Exp Biol 103:15–29Google Scholar
  11. Hidaka M, Takahashi K (1983) Fine structure and mechanical properties of the catch apparatus of the sea urchin spine, a collagenous connective tissue with muscle-like holding capacity. J Exp Biol 103:1–14Google Scholar
  12. Hukins DWL (1984) Tissue components. In: Hukins DWL (ed) Connective tissue matrix. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  13. Hukins DWL, Aspden RM, Yarker YE (1984) Fibre reinforcement and mechanical stability in articular cartilage. Eng Med 13:153–156Google Scholar
  14. Jeronimidis G, Vincent JFV (1984) Composite materials. In: Hukins DWL (ed) Connective tissue matrix. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 187–210Google Scholar
  15. Junqueira LCU, Montes GS, Mourao PAS, Carneiro J, Salles LMM, Bonetti SS (1980) Collagen-proteoglycans interaction during autonomy in the sea cucumber, Stichopus badionotus. Rev Can Biol 39:157–164Google Scholar
  16. Koob TJ, Vogel KG (1989) Nature of associations between small proteoglycans and collagen fibrils in tendon. Trans Orthoped Res Soc 35:36Google Scholar
  17. Kuppevelt THMSM van, Rutten TLM, Kuyper CMA (1987) Ultrastructural localization of proteoglycans in tissue using cuprolinic blue according to the critical electrolyte concentration method: comparison with biochemical data from the literature. Histochem J 18:520–526Google Scholar
  18. Märkel K, Roser U (1983) The spine tissues in the echinoid Eucidaris tribuloides. Zoomorphology 103:25–41Google Scholar
  19. Matsumura T (1973) Shape, size and amino acid composition of collagen fibril of the starfish Asterias amurensis. Comp Biochem Physiol 44B: 1197–1205Google Scholar
  20. Matsumura T (1974) Collagen fibrils of the sea cucumber, Stichopus japonicus: purification and morphological study. Connect Tissue Res 2:117–125Google Scholar
  21. Matsumura T, Shinmei M, Nagai Y (1973) Disaggregation of connective tissue: preparation of fibrous components from sea cucumber body wall and calf skin. J Biochem 73:155–162Google Scholar
  22. Meek KM, Scott JE, Nave C (1985) An x-ray diffraction analysis of rat tail tendons treated with cupromeronic blue. J Microsc 139:205–219Google Scholar
  23. Minns RJ, Soden PD, Jackson DS (1973) The role of the fibrous components and ground substance in the mechanical properties of biological tissues: a preliminary investigation. J Biomech 6:153–165Google Scholar
  24. Mosler E, Folkhard W, Koorzer E, Nemetschek-Ganzler H, Nemetschek Th, Koch MHJ (1985) Stress-induced molecular rearrangement in tendon collagen. J Mol Biol 182:589–596Google Scholar
  25. Partington FR, Wood GC (1963) The role of the non-collagen components in the mechanical behaviour of tendon fibers. Biochim Biophys Acta 69:485–495Google Scholar
  26. Piggott MR (1980) Load-bearing fibre composites. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruggeri A, Benazzo F (1984) Collagen-proteoglycan interaction. In: Ruggeri A, Motta PM (eds) Ultrastructure of the connective tissue matrix. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, pp 113–125Google Scholar
  28. Scott JE (1980) Collagen-proteoglycan interactions. Biochem J 187:887–891Google Scholar
  29. Scott JE (1988) Proteoglycan-fibrillar collagen interactions. Biochem J 252:313–323Google Scholar
  30. Scott JE, Orford CR (1981) Dermatan sulfate-rich proteoglycan associates with at tail-tendon collagen at the d band in the gap region. Biochem J 197:213–216Google Scholar
  31. Shadwick RE, Pollock C (1988) Dynamic mechanical properties of sea urchin spine ligaments. In: Burke RD, Mladenov PV, Lambert P, Parsley RL (eds) Echinoderm biology. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 635–640Google Scholar
  32. Smith AB (1980) Stereom microstructure of the echinoid test, Special papers in paleontology 25. The Paleontological Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith DS, Wainwright SA, Baker J, Cayer ML (1981) Structural features associated with movement and ‘catch’ of sea urchin spines. Tissue Cell 13:299–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Steven FS (1967) The effect of chelating agents on collagen interfibrillar matrix interactions in connective tissue. Biochim Biophys Acta 140:522–528Google Scholar
  35. Takahashi K (1967a) The ball and socket joint of the sea urchin spine: geometry and its functional implications. J Fac Sci Univ Tokyo 11:109–120Google Scholar
  36. Takahashi K (1967b) The catch apparatus of the sea urchin spine I. Gross histology. J Fac Sci Univ Tokyo 11:121–130Google Scholar
  37. Takahashi K (1967c) The catch apparatus of the sea urchin spine II. Responses to stimuli. J Fac Sci Univ Tokyo 11:131–135Google Scholar
  38. Trotter JA, Wofsy C (1989) The length of collagen fibrils in tendon. Trans Orthop Res Soc 14:180Google Scholar
  39. Uexküll J von (1900) Die Physiologie des Seeigelstachels. Zeit Biol 39:73–112Google Scholar
  40. Van Ness KP, Koob TJ, Eyre DL (1988) Collagen cross-linking: distribution of hydroxypyridinium crosslinks among invertebrate phyla and tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol 91B:531–534Google Scholar
  41. Vieira RP, Mourao PAS (1988) Occurrence of a unique fucosebranched chondroitin sulfate in the body wall of a sea cucumber. J Biol Chem 263:18176–18183Google Scholar
  42. Vogel KV, Fisher LW (1986) Comparisons of antibody reactivity and enzyme sensitivity between small proteoglycans from bovine tendon, bone and cartilage. J Biol Chem 261:11334–11340Google Scholar
  43. Wilkie IC (1984) Variable tensility in echinoderm collagenous tissues: a review. Mar Behav Physiol 11:1–34Google Scholar
  44. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Trotter
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Koob
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Anatomy and BiologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations