Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 559–565 | Cite as

Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digestors

  • B. K. Ahring
  • M. Sandberg
  • I. Angelidaki
Environmental Biotechnology Original Paper

Abstract

In continuously stirred tank reactor experiments, with manure as substrate at thermophilic temperatures, the use of volatile fatty acids (VFA) as process indicators was investigated. Changes in VFA level were shown to be a good parameter for indicating process instability. The VFA were evaluated according to their relative changes caused by changes in hydraulic loading, organic loading or temperature. Butyrate and isobutyrate together were found to be particularly good indicators. Butyrate and isobutyrate concentrations increased significantly 1 or 2 days after the imposed perturbation, which makes these acids suitable for process monitoring and important for process control of the anaerobic biological system. In addition it was shown in a batch experiment that VFA at concentrations up to 50 mM did not reduce the overall methane production rate. This showed that VFA accumulation in anaerobic reactors was the result of process imbalance, not the cause of inhibition, thus justifying the use of VFA as process indicators.

Keywords

Manure Butyrate Anaerobic Digestor Methane Production Volatile Fatty Acid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahring BK, Westermann P (1988) Product inhibition of butyrate metabolism by acetate and hydrogen in a thermophilic co-culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:2393–2397Google Scholar
  2. Allison JM (1978) Production of branched-chain volatile fatty acids by certain anaerobic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 35:872–877Google Scholar
  3. Angelidaki I, Ahring BK (1994) Anaerobic digestion of manure at different ammonia loads: effect of temperature. Water Res 28:727–731Google Scholar
  4. Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L, Ahring BK (1993) A mathematical model for dynamic simulation of anaerobic digestion of complex substrates, focusing on ammonia inhibition. Biotechnol Bioeng 42:159–166Google Scholar
  5. Boone DR (1980) Terminal reactions in the anaerobic digestion of animal waste. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:57–64Google Scholar
  6. Chen YR, Day CL (1986) Effect of temperature change on stability of thermophilic fermentation of swine waster. Agricul Wastes 16:313–317Google Scholar
  7. Chynoweth DP, Mah RA (1971) Anaerobic biological treatment processes. Adv Chem Sci 105:41–53Google Scholar
  8. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Trussel RR et al (1985) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer JR, Iannotti EL, Porter JH (1983) Anaerobic digestion of swine manure at various influent concentrations. Biol Wastes 6:147–166Google Scholar
  10. Gorris LGM, Deursen JMA van, Drift C van der, Vogels GD (1989) Inhibition of propionate degradation by acetate in methanogenic fluidized bed reactors. Biotechnol Lett 11:61–66Google Scholar
  11. Gourdon R, Vermande P (1987) Effects of propionic acid and concentration on anaerobic digestion of pig manure. Biomass 13:1–12Google Scholar
  12. Gujer W, Nehnder AJB (1983) Conversion processes in anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 15:127–167Google Scholar
  13. Hill DT (1982) A comprehensive dynamic model for animal waste methanogenesis. Trans ASAE 25:1374–1380Google Scholar
  14. Hill DT, Bolte JP (1989) Digester stress as related to iso-butyric and iso-valeric acids. Biol Wastes 28:33–37Google Scholar
  15. Hill DT, Holmberg RD (1988) Long chain volatile fatty acid relationships in anaerobic digestion of swine waste. Biol Wastes 23:195–214Google Scholar
  16. Hill DT, Cobb SA, Bolte JP (1987) Using volatile fatty acid relationships to predict anaerobic digester failure. Trans ASAE 30:496–501Google Scholar
  17. Kaspar HF, Wuhrmann K (1978) Kinetic parameters and relative turnovers of some important catabolic reactions in digesting sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 36:1–7Google Scholar
  18. Lovley DR, Klug MJ (1982) Intermediary metabolism of organic matter in the sediments of a eutrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:552–560Google Scholar
  19. McCarty PL, McKinney RE (1961) Volatile acid toxicity in anaerobic digestion. J Water Control Fed 33:223–232Google Scholar
  20. McInerney MJ, Bryant MP, Stafford DA (1980) Metabolic stages and energetics of microbial anaerobic digestion. In: Stafford DA, Wheatley BI, Hudges DE (eds) Anaerobic digestion. Applied Science, London, pp 91–98Google Scholar
  21. Mosey FE, Fernandes XA (1984) Mathematical modelling of methanogenesis in sewage sludge digestion. Microbiol Methods Environ Biotechnol 159–169Google Scholar
  22. Stieb M, Schink B (1989) Anaerobic degradation of isobutyrate by methanogenic enrichment cultures and by a Desulfococcus multivorans strain. Arch Microbiol 151:126–132Google Scholar
  23. Switzenbaum MS, Giraldo-Gomez E, Hickey RF (1990) Monitoring of the anaerobic methane fermentation process. Enzyme Microb Technol 12:722–730Google Scholar
  24. Tholozan JL, Samain E, Grivet JP (1988) Isomerization between n-butyrate and isobutyrate in enrichment cultures. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:187–191Google Scholar
  25. Varel VH, Isaacson HR, Bryant MP (1977) Thermophilic methane production from cattle waste. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:298–307Google Scholar
  26. Wu WM, Thiele JH, Jain MK, Zeikus JG (1993) Metabolic properties and kinetics of methanogenic granules. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 39:804–811Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. K. Ahring
    • 1
  • M. Sandberg
    • 1
  • I. Angelidaki
    • 2
  1. 1.The Anaerobic Microbiology/Biotechnology Research Group, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Building 115The Technical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Biotechnology, Building 223The Technical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations