Flow cytometric measurements of cell volumes and DNA contents during culture of indigenous soil bacteria
- 260 Downloads
- 24 Citations
Abstract
Indigenous soil bacteria were released from a clay loam soil by repeated washing and centrifugation followed by density gradient centrifugation to remove enough soil particles to allow a flow cytometric (FC) study of cell numbers, cell sizes, and DNA content in single cells. The bacteria were suspended in liquid soil extract medium and incubated at 15°C for 60 h, during which direct fluorescence microscopic counts (acridine orange direct counts, AODC) were done along with the FC measurements. Cells of Escherichia coli with a known number of whole genomes per cell (rifampicin treated) were used as a calibration standard both for the DNA measurements (mitramycin-ethidium bromide stain) and cell volumes (light scatter). In response to the nutrients in the soil extract medium, the indigenous soil bacteria increased in numbers and respiration rate after a lag period of about 17 h. The onset of growth was seen first as an increase in respiration rate, numbers of large cells, and the amounts of DNA per cell in the large cells. Respiration and direct microscopical determination of biovolume was used to calculate the average growth yield on the basis of cell carbon, which was found to be 20–30% during the period of active growth. For separate volume groups of the indigenous cells, the DNA content ranged from 1.5 to 15 fg DNA per cell, the majority being below 4 fg DNA. During growth in soil extract medium, the numbers of large cells (volume > 0.18 μm3) increased, and the frequency of cells with high DNA contents increased as well for this group. For the smallest sized cells (volumes < 0.065 μm3) it was not possible to detect any increase in numbers during the 60-h incubation, and the DNA contents of these cells remained virtually unchanged. Compared with cell volumes based on microscopy (AODC), the FC-light scatter data grossly overestimated the volume for indigenous cells but apparently not for the newly formed cells during growth in the suspension. This probably reflects differences in light scatter properties due to adsorbed materials on the indigenous cells. The FC-DNA measurements confirmed earlier findings in that the average DNA content per cell was low (around 2 fg DNA per cell), but demonstrated a positive relationship between cell size and DNA content for indigenous cells.
Keywords
Acridine Acridine Orange Light Scatter Clay Loam Soil Microscopic CountPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Allman R, Hann AC, Manchee R, Lloyd D (1992) Characterization of bacteria by multiparameter flow cytometry. J Appl Bacteriol 73:438–444Google Scholar
- 2.Aseeva IV, Lysak LV (1982) Effect of growth temperature on nucleic acid content of psychrophilic soil bacteria. Microbiology 50:607–610Google Scholar
- 3.Bakken LR (1985) Separation and purification of bacteria from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1482–1487Google Scholar
- 4.Bakken LR, Olsen RA (1983) Buoyant densities and dry-matter contents of microorganisms: conversion of a measured biovolume into biomass. Appl Environ Microbiol 145:1188–1195Google Scholar
- 5.Bakken LR, Olsen RA (1986) Dwarf cells in soil. A result of starvation of normal bacteria, or a separate population? Proc IV ISME:561–566Google Scholar
- 6.Bakken LR, Olsen RA (1989) DNA-content of soil bacteria of different cell size. Soil Biol Biochem 21:789–793Google Scholar
- 7.Barlogie B, Spitzer G, Hart IS, Johnston DA, Büchner T, Schumann J, Drewinko B (1976) DNA histogram analysis of human hemopoietic cells. Blood 8:245–258Google Scholar
- 8.Brunchede H, Dove TL, Bremer H (1977) Establishment of exponential growth after a nutritional shift-up in Escherichia coli B/r: accumulation of deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid, and protein. J Bacteriol 129:1020–1033Google Scholar
- 9.Christensen H (1993) Conversion factors for the thymidine incorporation technique estimated with bacteria in pure culture and on seedling roots. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1085–1096Google Scholar
- 10.Christensen H, Bakken LR, Olsen RA (1993) Soil bacterial DNA and biovolume profiles measured by flow cytometry. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 102:128–140Google Scholar
- 11.Foster RC (1988) Microenvironments of soil microorganisms. Biol Fertil Soils 6:189–203Google Scholar
- 12.Fægri A, Torsvik VL, Goksöyr J (1977) Bacterial and fungal activities in soil: separation of bacteria and fungi by a rapid fractionated centrifugation technique. Soil Biol Biochem 9:105–112Google Scholar
- 13.Glass RE (1982) Gene function. E. coli and its heritable elements. Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Herdman M (1985) The evolution of bacterial genomes. In: Cavalier-Smith T (ed) The evolution of genome size. John Wiley and Sons, London, pp 37–69Google Scholar
- 15.Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S (1977) Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS, Wedderbum RWM (1976) The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. III. The relationship between soil biovolume, measured by optical microscopy, and the flush of decomposition caused by fumigation. Soil Biol Biochem 8:189–202Google Scholar
- 17.Koch AL, Ehrenfeld E (1968) The size and shape of bacteria by light-scattering measurements. Biochem Biophys Acta 165:262–273Google Scholar
- 18.Lund V, Goksoyr J (1980) Effects of water fluctuations on microbial mass and activity in soil. Microb Ecol 6:115–123Google Scholar
- 19.Neidhardt FC (1987) Chemical composition of Escherichia coli. In: Neidhardt FC (ed) Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, vol. 1. Am Soc Microbiol, Washington DC, pp 3–6Google Scholar
- 20.Olsen RA, Bakken LR (1987) Viability of soil bacteria: optimization of the plate-counting technique. Microb Ecol 13:59–74Google Scholar
- 21.Olsson S, Bååth E, Söderstrom B (1987) Growth of Verticillium dahliae Kleb. hyphae and bacteria along the roots of rape (Brassica napus L.) seedlings. Can J Microbiol 33:916–919Google Scholar
- 22.Page S, Burns RG (1991) Flow cytometry as a means of enumerating bacteria introduced into soil. Soil Biol Biochem 23:1025–1028Google Scholar
- 23.Pato ML (1975) Alterations of the rate of movement of deoxyribonucleic acid replication forks. J Bacteriol 123:272–277Google Scholar
- 24.Riemann B, Bell RT, Jorgensen NOG (1990) Incorporation of thymidine, adenine, and leucine into natural bacterial assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 65:87–94Google Scholar
- 25.Robertson BR, Button DV (1989) Characterizing aquatic bacteria according to population, cell size, and apparent DNA content by flow cytometry. Cytometry 10:70–76Google Scholar
- 26.Simon M, Azam F (1989) Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 51:201–213Google Scholar
- 27.Steen HB (1983) A microscope-based flow cytophotometer. Histochem J 15:147–160Google Scholar
- 28.Steen HG, Boye E (1980) Escherichia coli growth studied by dual-parameter flow cytophotometry. J Bacteriol 145:1091–1094Google Scholar
- 29.Torsvik V, Salte K, Sørheim R, Goksøyr J (1990) Comparison of phenotypic diversity of DNA heterogenity in a population of soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:776–781Google Scholar
- 30.Torsvik V, Goksøyr J, Daae FL (1990) High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:782–787PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Turner SM, Newman EI (1984) Growth of bacteria on roots of grasses: influence of mineral nutrient supply and interactions between species. J Gen Microbiol 130:505–512Google Scholar
- 32.Van Dilla MA, Langlois RG, Pinkel D, Yajko D, Hadley WK (1983) Bacterial characterization by flow cytometry. Science 220:620–622Google Scholar
- 33.Wehrli W, Staehelin M (1971) Actions of the rifamycins. Bacteriol Rev 35:290–309Google Scholar