Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 174, Issue 5, pp 551–557 | Cite as

Electrophysiological measurements of spectral mechanisms in the retinas of two cervids: white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and fallow deer (Dama dama)

  • G. H. Jacobs
  • J. F. DeeganII
  • J. Neitz
  • B. P. Murphy
  • K. V. Miller
  • R. L. Marchinton
Article

Abstract

Electroretinogram (ERG) flicker photometry was used to study the spectral mechanisms in the retinas of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and fallow deer (Dama dama). In addition to having a rod pigment with maximum sensitivity (λmax) of about 497 nm, both species appear to have two classes of photopic receptors. They share in common a short-wavelength-sensitive cone mechanism having λmax in the region of 450–460 nm. Each also has a cone having peak sensitivity in the middle wavelengths, but these differ slightly for the two species. In white-tailed deer the λmax of this cone is about 537 nm; for the fallow deer the average λmax value for this mechanism was 542 nm. Deer resemble other ungulates and many other types of mammal in having two classes of cone pigment and, thus, the requisite retinal basis for dichromatic color vision.

Key words

Cone photopigments Ungulate Deer Electroretinogram Dichromacy Odocoileus virginianus Dama dama 

Abbreviations

ERG

electroretinogram

LWS

long wavelength sensitive

MWS

middle wavelength sensitive

SWS

short wavelength sensitive

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker RH (1984) Origin, classification and distribution. In: Howells LK (ed) White-tailed deer: Ecology and management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg Pennsylvania, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  2. Baylor DA, Nunn BS, Schnapf JL (1987) Spectral sensitivity of cones of the monkey Macaco fascicularis. J Physiol (Lond) 390:145–160Google Scholar
  3. Corbet GB, Hall JE (1991) A world list of mammalian species. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalrymple BW (1975) When can your quarry see you? Outdoor Life 156:61–65, 143–144Google Scholar
  5. Ebrey RG, Honig B (1977) New wavelength-dependent visual pigment nomograms. Vision Res 17:147–151Google Scholar
  6. Hao Y, Soref CM, Geke Jr CG, Wong F (1992) The visual pigment gene family and distribution of photoreceptors in the pig retina. Invest Ophthal Visual Sci 33:1004Google Scholar
  7. Jacobs GH (1993) The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol Rev 68:413–471Google Scholar
  8. Jacobs GH, Neitz J (1985) Spectral positioning of mammalian cone pigments. J Opt Soc Am A 2:P13Google Scholar
  9. Jacobs GH, Neitz J (1987) Inheritance of color vision in a New World monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2545–2549Google Scholar
  10. Jacobs GH, Neitz J, Deegan II JF (1991) Retinal receptors in rodents maximally sensitive to ultraviolet light. Nature 353:655–656Google Scholar
  11. Jacobs GH, Deegan II JF, Crognale MA, Fenwick JA (1993) Photopigments of dogs and foxes and their implications for canid vision. Visual Neurosci 10:173–180Google Scholar
  12. Knowles A, Dartnall HJA (1977) The photobiology of vision. In: Davson H (ed) The eye, vol 2B. Academic Press, New York, p 689Google Scholar
  13. Marchinton RL, Hirth, DH (1984) Behavior. In: Howells LK (ed) White-tailed deer: Ecology and management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg Pennsylvania, pp 129–168Google Scholar
  14. Mech DL, DelGiudice GD, Keins PD, Seal US (1985) Yohimbine hydrochloride as an antagonist to xylazine hydrochloride-ketamine hydrochloride immobilization of white-tailed deer. J Wildl Disques 21:405–410Google Scholar
  15. Neitz J, Jacobs GH (1984) ERG measurements of cone spectral sensitivity in dichromatic monkeys. J Opt Soc Am A 1:1175–1180Google Scholar
  16. Neitz J, Jacobs GH (1989) Spectral sensitivity of cones in an ungulate. Visual Neurosci 2:97–100Google Scholar
  17. Nowak RM (1991) Walker's mammals of the world. Fifth Edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  18. Putnam R (1988) The natural history of deer. Comstock Publ Assoc, Ithaca New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Pokorny J, Smith VC, Verriest G, Pinckers AJLG (1979) Congenital and acquired color vision defects. Grune & Stratton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Sauer PR (1984) Physical characteristics. In: Howells LK (ed) White-tailed deer: Ecology and management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg Pennsylvania, pp 73–90Google Scholar
  21. Steinberg RH, Reid M, Lacy PL (1973) The distribution of rods and cones in the retina of the cat (Felis domestica). J Comp Neurol 148:229–248Google Scholar
  22. Smith BL, Skotko DJ, Owen W, McDaniel RJ (1989) Color vision in white-tailed deer. Psychol Rec 39:195–202Google Scholar
  23. Walls GL (1942) The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. The Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills MichiganGoogle Scholar
  24. Witzel DA, Springer MD, Mollenhauer HH (1978) Cone and rod photoreceptors in the white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus. Am J Vet Res 39:699–701Google Scholar
  25. Wyszecki G, Stiles WS (1982) Color science. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Zacks JL (1985) Photopic spectral sensitivity of the white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci Suppl 26:185Google Scholar
  27. Zacks JL, Budde W (1983) Behavioral investigations of color vision in the white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci Suppl 24:183Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. H. Jacobs
    • 1
  • J. F. DeeganII
    • 1
  • J. Neitz
    • 2
  • B. P. Murphy
    • 3
  • K. V. Miller
    • 3
  • R. L. Marchinton
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Department of Cell Biology and AnatomyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  3. 3.D. B. Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations