Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 201–208 | Cite as

The adaptive significance of male polymorphism in the acarid mite Caloglyphus berlesei

  • Jacek Radwan
Article

Summary

Two forms of males occur in the acarid mite, Caloglyphus berlesei. One of them uses its thickened third pair of legs to kill other males; the other, without modified legs, does not attack other males. Previous studies have shown that the form of the male is environmentally determined: “fighter” males develop only at low population densities and their development can be suppressed by substances emanating from dense colonies. In this study, the duration of development, longevity and virility of the two male morphs were measured. The only significant difference was that fighters had a shorter development time between the two last moults. In another experiment, two groups of colonies were maintained under the same conditions but had different numbers of individuals: small colonies contained 2 fighters and 2 non-fighters, whereas large colonies contained 30 males of each type. The relative reproductive success of both morphs was estimated from numbers of matings. In small colonies, the estimated reproductive success (ERS) was significantly higher for fighters than for non-fighters, mainly because in over 50% of these colonies a single fighter male managed to kill all the rival males and monopolize the females. The opposite was true in large colonies, in which non-fighters achieved significantly higher ERS, mainly because the fighters were killed in fights more often than the non-fighters. This implies that the ratio of costs to benefits obtained by adopting the fighter-male strategy increases with the number of rival males, which may explain conditional male development in C. berlesei.

Key words

Fights Reproductive success Polyphenism Alternative behaviors Population size 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander AJ, Staaden M van (1989) Alternative sexual tactics in male bladder grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Pneumoridae). In: Bruton MN (ed) Alternative life histories of animals Kluwer, Academic, Dordrecht, pp 261–277Google Scholar
  2. Austad SN (1984) A classification of alternative reproductive behaviors and methods for field-testing ESS models. Am Zool 24:309–319Google Scholar
  3. Chmiclewski W, Lipa JJ (1967) Biological and ecological studies on Caloglyphus mite (Acarina: Acaridae) associated with Scarabaeid. Acta Parasitol Pol 14:179–190Google Scholar
  4. Crespi BJ (1988) Adaptation, compromise and constraint: the development, morphometrics and behavioral basis of a fighter-flier polymorphism in male Haplothrips karnyi (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:93–104Google Scholar
  5. Dawkins R (1980) Good strategy or evolutionary stable strategy? In: Barlow GW, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? Westview, Boulder, pp 331–367Google Scholar
  6. Dimock DV (1983) In defense of harem: intraspecific aggression by male water mites (Acari: Unionicolidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 76:463–465Google Scholar
  7. Dominey WJ (1980) Female mimicry in the bluegill sunfish — a genetic polymorphism? Nature 284:546–548Google Scholar
  8. Dominey WJ (1984) Alternative mating tactics and evolutionary stable strategies. Am Zool 24:385–396Google Scholar
  9. Eberhard WG (1982) Beetle horn dimorphism: Making the best of a bad lot? Am Nat 119:420–426Google Scholar
  10. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Erkay SA (1987) Observations on the biology of two species of acarid mites. Folia Entomol Hung 48:21–27Google Scholar
  12. Gross MR (1982) Sneakers, satellites and parentals: Polymorphic mating strategies in North American sunfishes. Z Tierpsychol 60:1–16Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton WD (1979) Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 167–222Google Scholar
  14. Houck MA, OConnor BM (1991) Ecological and evolutionary significance of phoresy in the Astigmata. Annu Rev Entomol 36:611–636Google Scholar
  15. Hughes AM (1976) The mites of stored food and houses. Tech Bull Min Agric Fish Food 9Google Scholar
  16. Hunter PE (1960) Plastic paint as a marker for mites. Ann Entomol Soc Am 53:698Google Scholar
  17. Kranz GW (1978) A manual of acarology, 2nd edn. Oregon State University, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  18. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Moran NA (1992) The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am Nat 139:971–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Radwan J (1991) Sperm competition in the mite Caloglyphus berlesei. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:291–296Google Scholar
  21. Radwan J (1992) The influence of a crowded environment on the size of males of Caloglyphus berlesei. Int J Acarol 18:67–68Google Scholar
  22. Radwan J (1993) Kin recognition in the acarid mite Caloglyphus berlesei: negative evidence. Anim Behav 45:200–202Google Scholar
  23. Radwan J, Witaliński W (1991) Sperm competition. Nature 352:671–672Google Scholar
  24. Samsinak K (1960) Über einige myrmekophile Milben aus der Familie Acaridae. Casopis Ceskoslovenske Spolecnosti Entomoloicke Acta. Soc Entomol Cechosloveniae 57:185–193Google Scholar
  25. Shuster SM, Wade MJ (1991) Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine Isopod. Nature 350:608–610Google Scholar
  26. Timms S, Ferro DN, Waller JB (1980) Suppression of production of pleomorphic males in Sancassania berlesei (Michael) (Acari: Acaridae). Int J Acarol 6:91–96Google Scholar
  27. Timms S, Ferro DN, Emberson RM (1981) Andropolymorphism and its heritability in Sancassnia berlesei (Michael) (Acari: Acaridae). Acarologia 22:391–398Google Scholar
  28. Woodring JP (1969a) Environmental regulation of andropolymorphism in Tyroglyphids (Acari). In: Evans GO (ed) Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Acarology. Academiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 433–440Google Scholar
  29. Woodring JP (1969b) Observations on the biology of six species of acarid mites. Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:102–108Google Scholar
  30. Zeh DW, Zeh JA (1992) Dispersal-generated sexual selection in a beetle-riding pseudoscorpion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:135–142Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacek Radwan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoopsychology and Animal Ethology, Institute of Environmental BiologyJagiellonian UniversityKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations