Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 191–199

Incest avoidance, fluctuating asymmetry, and the consequences of inbreeding in Iridomyrmex humilis, an ant with multiple queen colonies

  • Laurent Keller
  • Luc Passera
Article

Summary

Inbreeding may have important consequences for the genetic structure of social insects and thus for sex ratios and the evolution of sociality and multiple queen (polygynous) colonies. The influence of kinship on mating preferences was investigated in a polygynous ant species, Iridomyrmex humilis, which has within-nest mating. When females were presented simultaneously with a brother that had been reared in the same colony until the pupal stage and an unrelated male produced in another colony, females mated preferentially with the unrelated male. The role of environmental colony-derived cues was tested in a second experiment where females were presented with two unrelated males, one of which had been reared in the same colony until the pupal stage (i.e., as in the previous experiment), while the other had been produced in another colony. In this experiment there was no preferential mating with familiar or unfamiliar males, suggesting that colony-derived cues might not be important in mating preferences. Inbreeding was shown to have no strong effect on the reproductive output of queens as measured by the number of worker and sexual pupae produced. The level of fluctuating asymmetry of workers produced by inbreeding queens was not significantly higher than that of non-inbreeding queens. Finally, colonies headed by inbreeding queens did not produce adult diploid males. Based on the current hypotheses of sex-determination the most plausible explanations for the absence of diploid-male-producing colonies are that (i) workers recognized and eliminated these males early in their development, and/or (ii) there are multiple sex-determining loci in this species. It is suggested that even if inbreeding effects on colony productivity are absent or low, incest avoidance mechanisms may have evolved and been maintained if inbreeding queens produce a higher proportion of unviable offspring.

Key words

Ant Fluctuating asymmetry Hapio-diploidy Inbreeding Polygyny 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander RD, Sherman PW (1977) Local mate competition and parental investment in social insects. Science 196:494–500Google Scholar
  2. Askew RR (1968) Consideration on speciation in Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Evolution 22:643–645Google Scholar
  3. Bader RS (1965) Fluctuating asymmetry in the dentition of the house mouse. Growth 29:291–300Google Scholar
  4. Benois A (1973) Incidences des facteurs écologiques sur le cycle annuel at l'activité saisonnière de la fourmi d'Argentine Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), dans la région d'Antibes. Insectes Soc 20:267–296Google Scholar
  5. Blouin SF, Blouin M (1988) Inbreeding avoidance behaviors. Trends Ecol Evol 3:230–233Google Scholar
  6. Brückner C (1978) Why are there inbreeding effects in haplo-diploid systems? Evolution 32:456–458Google Scholar
  7. Buschinger A (1989) Evolution, speciation, and interbreeding in the parasitic ant genus Epimyrma (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J Evol Biol 2:265–283Google Scholar
  8. Camargo CA de (1982) Longevity of diploid males, haploid males, and workers of the social bee Melipona quadrifasciata, Hymenoptera, Apidae. J Kans Entomol Soc 55:8–12Google Scholar
  9. Carlin NF, Frumhoff PC (1990) Nepotism in the honey bee. Nature 346:706–709Google Scholar
  10. Carlin NF, Hölldobler B (1983) Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants. Science 222:1027–1029Google Scholar
  11. Carlin NF, Hölldobler B (1986) The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) 1. Hierarchical cues in small colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:23–134Google Scholar
  12. Carlin NF, Hölldobler B (1987) The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) 2. Larger colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:209–217Google Scholar
  13. Carlin NF, Hölldobler B (1991) The role of the queen in ant nestmate recognition: reply to Crosland. Anim Behav 41:525–527Google Scholar
  14. Carlin NF, Reeve HK, Cover SP (in press) Kin recognition and division of labor among matrilines in the polygynous ant Camponotus planatus. In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke GM, Brand GW, Whitten MJ (1986) Fluctuating asymmetry: a bechnique for measuring developmental stress caused by inbreeding. Aust J Biol Sci 39:145–153Google Scholar
  17. Clarke GM, Oldroyd BP, Hunt P (1992) The genetic basis of developmental stability in Apis mellifera: heterozygosity versus genetic balance. Evolution 46:753–762Google Scholar
  18. Crespi B (1992) Cannibalism and trophic eggs in subsocial and eusocial insects. In: Elgar MA, Crespi MA (eds) Cannibalism, ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 176–213Google Scholar
  19. Crosland MWJ (1990) The influence of the queen, colony size and worker ovarian development on nestmate recognition in the ant Rhytidoponera confusa. Anim Behav 39:413–425Google Scholar
  20. Crozier RH (1970) On the potential for genetic variability in haplodiploidy. Genetica 41:551–556Google Scholar
  21. Crozier RH (1971) Heterozygosity and sex determination in haplo diploidy. Am Nat 105:399–412Google Scholar
  22. Crozier RH (1975) Animal cytogenetics 3. Insecta 7. Hymenoptera. Gebruder Borntraeger, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. Crozier RH (1977) Evolutionary genetics of the Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 22:263–288Google Scholar
  24. Crozier RH (1980) Genetical structures of social insects populations. In: Markl H (ed) Evolution of social behaviour: hypotheses and empirical tests (Dahlem Konferenzen). Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 129–146Google Scholar
  25. Crozier RH, Pamilo P, Crozier YC (1984) Relatedness and microgeographic genetic variation in Rhytidoponera mayri, an Australian arid-zone ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:143–150Google Scholar
  26. Darwin CR (1868) Variation of animals and plants under domestication. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Davis SK, Strassmann JE, Hughes C, Pletscher LS, Templeton AR (1990) Population structure and kinship in Polistes (Hymenoptera, Vespidae): an analysis using ribosomal DNA and protein electrophoresis. Evolution 44:1242–1253Google Scholar
  28. Gamboa GJ, Reeve HK, Ferguson ID, Wacker TL (1986) Nestmate recognition in social wasps: the origin and acquisition of recognition cues. Anim Behav 34:685–695Google Scholar
  29. Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical evolution of social behavior, I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical evolution of social behavior, II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamilton WD (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3:193–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herbers JM (in press) Ecological determinant of queen number in ants. In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The Ants. Harvard Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Imai HT, Crozier RH, Taylor RW (1977) Karyotype evolution in Australian ants (Hym. Formicidae). Chromosoma 59:341–393Google Scholar
  35. Kaufmann B, Boomsma JJ, Passera L, Petersens KN (1992) Mating structure and relatedness in a french population of the unicolonial ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Insectes Soc 39:195–200Google Scholar
  36. Keller L (1988) Evolutionary implications of polygyny in the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): an experimental study. Anim Behav 36:159–165Google Scholar
  37. Keller L (ed) (in press) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Keller L, Passera L (1989) Influence of the number of queens on nestmate recognition and attractiveness of queens to workers in the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Anim Behav 37:733–740Google Scholar
  39. Keller L, Passera L (1992) Mating system, optimal number of coatings, and sperm transfer in the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:359–366Google Scholar
  40. Keller L, Ross KG (1993) Phenotypic basis of reproductive success in a social insect: genetic and social determinants. Science 260:1107–1110Google Scholar
  41. Keller L, Vargo EL (in press) Reproductive structure and reproductive roles in colonies of eusocial insects In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Keller L, Passera L, Suzzoni J-P (1989a) Queen execution in the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Physiol Entomol 14:157–163Google Scholar
  43. Keller L, Cherix D, Ulloa-Chacón P (1989b) Description of a new artificial diet for rearing ant colonies as Iridomyrmex humilis, Monomorium pharaonis and Wasmannia auropunctata (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Insectes Soc 36:348–352Google Scholar
  44. Kerr WE (1987) Sex determination in bees XXI Number of XO heteroalleles in a natural population of Melipona compressipes fasciculata (Apidae). Insectes Soc 34:274–279Google Scholar
  45. Kukuk PF (1992) Cannibalism in social bees. In: Elgar MA, Crespi MA (eds) Cannibalism, ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 214–236Google Scholar
  46. Kukuk PF, May B (1990) Diploid males in a primitively eusocial bee, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Evolution 44:1522–1528Google Scholar
  47. Leamy L (1984) Morphometric studies in inbred and hybrid house mice V Directional and fluctuating asymmetry. Am Nat 123:579–593Google Scholar
  48. Leary RF, Allendorf FW (1989) Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of stress: implications for conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 4:214–217Google Scholar
  49. Leary RF, Allendorf FW, Knuderson RL (1983) Developmental stability and enzyme heterozygosity in rainbow trout. Nature 301:71–72Google Scholar
  50. Lenoir A, Querard L, Pondicq N, Berton F (1988) Reproduction and dissemination of the ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Psyche 95:21–44Google Scholar
  51. Markin GP (1970a) The seasonal life cycle of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), in southern California. Ann Entomol Soc Am 63:1238–1242Google Scholar
  52. Markin GP (1970b) Food distribution within laboratory colonies of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Insectes Soc 17:127–157Google Scholar
  53. Mather K (1953) Genetical control of stability in development. Heredity 7:297–336Google Scholar
  54. Michener CD (1964) Reproductive efficiency in relation with colony size in hymenopterous societies. Insectes Soc 11:317–341Google Scholar
  55. Mitton JB, Grant MC (1984) Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate, and developmental homeostasis. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:479–499Google Scholar
  56. Møller AP (1992) Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature 357:238–240Google Scholar
  57. Newell W, Barber TC (1913) The Argentine ant. USDA Bureau Entomol Bull 122:1–98Google Scholar
  58. Nonacs P (1988) Queen number in colonies of social Hymenoptera as a kin-selected adaptation. Evolution 42:566–580Google Scholar
  59. Packer L, Owen RE (1990) Allozyme variation, linkage desequilibrium and diploid male production in a primitively social bee Augochlorella striata (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Heredity 1265:241–248Google Scholar
  60. Page RE Jr, Robinson GE, Fondrk MK (1989) Genetic specialists, kin recognition and nepotism in honey-bee colonies. Nature 338:576–579Google Scholar
  61. Palmer RA, Strobeck C (1986) Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, patterns. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:391–421Google Scholar
  62. Pamilo P (1983) Genetic differentiation within subdivided populations of Formica ants. Evolution 37:1010–1022Google Scholar
  63. Pamilo P (1985) Effect of inbreeding on genetic relatedness. Hereditas 103:195–200Google Scholar
  64. Pamilo P, Chautems D, Cherix D (1992) Genetic differentiation of disjunct populations of the ants Formica aquilonia and Formica lugubris in Europe. Insectes Soc 39:15–29Google Scholar
  65. Parsons PA (1990) Fluctuating asymmetry: an epygenetic measure of stress. Biol Rev 65:131–145Google Scholar
  66. Passera L (1984) L'organisation sociale chez les fourmis. Ed Univ Paul Sabatier, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  67. Passera L, Keller L (1987) Energy investment during the differentiation of sexuals and workers in the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Mitt Schweiz Entomol Ges 60:249–260Google Scholar
  68. Passera L, Keller L (1990) Loss of mating flight and shift in the pattern of carbohydrate storage in sexuals of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J Comp Physiol B 160:207–211Google Scholar
  69. Passera L, Keller L (1992) The period of sexual maturation and the age at mating in Iridomyrmex humilis, an ant with intranidal mating. J Zool London 228:141–153Google Scholar
  70. Passera L, Keller L (in press) Mate availability and male dispersal in the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis. Anim BehavGoogle Scholar
  71. Passera L, Keller L, Suzzoni J-P (1988a) Control of brood male production in the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Insectes Soc 35:19–33Google Scholar
  72. Passera L, Keller L, Suzzoni J-P (1988b) Queen replacement in dequeened colonies of the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Psyche 99:59–66Google Scholar
  73. Peeters C, Crewe R (1985) Worker reproduction in the ponerine ant Ophthalmopone berthoudi: An alternative form of eusocial organization. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:29–37Google Scholar
  74. Petersen M, Buschinger A (1971) Das Begattungsverhalten der Pharaoameise Monomorium pharaonis L. Z Angew Entomol 68:168–175Google Scholar
  75. Pollock GB (1983) Population viscosity and kin selection. Am Nat 122:817–829Google Scholar
  76. Queller DC, Hughes R, Strassmann JE (1990) Wasps fail to make distinction. Nature 344:388Google Scholar
  77. Reeve K, Ratnieks FLW (in press) Resolution of conflict structure in polygynous societies: mutual tolerance and reproductive skew. In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  78. Reeve HK, Westneat DF, Noon WA, Sherman PW, Aquadro CF (1990) DNA “fingerprinting” reveals high levels of inbreeding in colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:2496–2500Google Scholar
  79. Rosengren R, Sundstöm L, Fortelius W (in press) Monogyny and polygyny in Formica ants: A result of alternative dispersal tactics? In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  80. Ross KG (1988) Population and colony level genetic studies of ants In: Trager JC (ed) Advances in myrmecology. Brill, New York, pp 189–215Google Scholar
  81. Ross KG, Carpenter JM (1991) Phylogenetic analysis and the evolution of queen number in eusocial Hymenoptera. J Evol Biol 4:117–130Google Scholar
  82. Ross KG, Fletcher DJC (1985) Genetic origin of male diploidy in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, and its evolutionary significance. Evolution 39:888–903Google Scholar
  83. Ross KG, Robertson JL (1990) Developmental stability, heterozygosity, and fitness in two introduced fire ants (Solenopsis invicta and S. richteri) and their hybrid. Heredity 64:93–103Google Scholar
  84. Ross KG, Vargo EL, Keller L, Trager JC (in press) Effect of a founder event on variation at the genetic sex-determination system of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. GeneticsGoogle Scholar
  85. Seppä P (1992) Genetic relatedness of worker nestmates in Myrmica ruginodis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) populations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:253–260Google Scholar
  86. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd edn. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  87. Soulé ME (1982) Allometric variation. 1. The theory and some consequences. Am Nat 120:751–764Google Scholar
  88. Soulé ME, Cuzin-Roudy J (1982) Allometric variation. 2. Developmental instability of extreme phenotypes. Am Nat 120:765–786Google Scholar
  89. Suomalainen E (1962) Significance of parthogenesis in the evolution of insects. Annu Rev Entomol 7:349–366Google Scholar
  90. Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263Google Scholar
  91. Uyenoyama MK (1984) Inbreeding and the evolution of altruism under kin selection: effects on relatedness and group structure. Evolution 38:778–795Google Scholar
  92. Van Loon AJ, Boomsma JJ, Andrasfalvy A (1990) A new polygynous Lasius species (Hymenoptera; Formicidae) from central Europe. 1. Description and general biology. Insectes Soc 37:363–375Google Scholar
  93. Vargo EL, Fletcher DJC (1989) On the relationship between queen number and fecundity in polygynous colonies of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Physiol Entomol 14:223–232Google Scholar
  94. Vargo EL, Passera L (1991) Pheromonal and behavioral queen control over the production of gynes in the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:161–169Google Scholar
  95. Wade MJ, Breden F (1981) Effect of inbreeding on the evolution of altruistic behavior by kin selection. Evolution 35:844–858Google Scholar
  96. Ward PS (1980) Genetic variation and population differentiation in the Rhytidoponera impressa group, a species complex of ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Evolution 34:1060–1076Google Scholar
  97. Ward PS (1981) Colony and life history of the Rhytidiponera impressa group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). II Colony origin, seasonal cycles, and reproduction. Psyche 88:109–126Google Scholar
  98. Woyke J (1963) What happens to diploid drone larvae in a honey-bee colony. J Apic Res 2:73–75Google Scholar
  99. Woyke J (1980) Evidence of action of cannibalism substance in Apis cerana indica. J Apic Res 19:51–63Google Scholar
  100. Yamauchi K, Furukawa T, Kinomura K, Takamine H, Tsuji K (1991) Secondary polygyny by inbred wingless sexuals in the dolichoderine ant Techonomyrmex albipes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:313–319Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurent Keller
    • 1
  • Luc Passera
    • 2
  1. 1.Museum of Comparative ZoologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Centre de Recherche en Biologie du ComportementUniversité Paul-SabatierToulouse CedexFrance
  3. 3.Zoologisches Institut, Bern UniversityEthologische Station HashHinterkappelenSwitzerland
  4. 4.Institut de Zoologie et d'Ecologie Animale, University of LausanneBâtiment de BiologieLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations