Space Science Reviews

, Volume 50, Issue 1–2, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Two centuries of study of Algol systems

  • Alan H. Batten

Abstract

The periodicity of the light variation of Algol, discovered just over 200 years ago, may be regarded as the beginning of the study of eclipsing binary systems, especially those of the Algol type. Such studies, however, gained no real momentum until Vogel, 100 years ago, demonstrated by spectroscopy that the binary hypothesis of Algol's light changes is, in its essentials, correct. Three elements were needed to give us our modern notions of evolution by mass-transfer, namely: (i) results of combined analysis of light-curves and velocity-curves, (ii) evidence of circumstellar matter within binary systems and (iii) the notion that at least one component of an Algol system was near the limit of dynamical stability. All three entered the literature within about a decade, approximately halfway through the second century of eclipsing-binary studies; but it is the computational and instrumental developments of the last 25 years that have made real progress possible. We still lack commensurate theoretical developments, and the whole question of the contribution of Algol systems to the development of the Galaxy has barely been considered.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, R.G. 1935, The Binary Stars McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, p. 3 (Dover Reprint 1964).Google Scholar
  2. Audouze, J. and Tinsley, B.M. 1976, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 14, 23.Google Scholar
  3. Batten, A.H. 1981, in Investigating the Universe ed. F.D. Kahn, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, p. 207.Google Scholar
  4. Batten, A.H. 1988, Publ. Astr. Soc. Pacific 100, 160.Google Scholar
  5. Biermann, P. 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 10, 205.Google Scholar
  6. Budding, E. 1984, Bull. d'Inf. Centre Données Stellaires 27, 91.Google Scholar
  7. Budding, E. 1988, Southern Stars 32, 180.Google Scholar
  8. Carpenter, E.F. 1930, Astrophys. J. 72, 205.Google Scholar
  9. Crawford, J.A. 1955, Astrophys. J. 121, 71.Google Scholar
  10. Dugan, R.S. 1920, Contr. Princeton Obs. No. 5.Google Scholar
  11. Eggen, O.J. 1957, Observatory 77, 191.Google Scholar
  12. Garrison, R.F., Schild, R.E., Hiltner, W.A. and Krzemiski, W. 1984, Astrophys. J. 276, L13.Google Scholar
  13. Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, F. and Mezzetti, M. 1983, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 52, 35.Google Scholar
  14. Goodricke, J. 1783, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 73, 474.Google Scholar
  15. Hoskin, M.A. 1979, J. Hist. Astron. 10, 23.Google Scholar
  16. Hoyle, F. 1955, Frontiers of Astronomy, Wm Heinemann, London, pp. 195–202.Google Scholar
  17. Jeffreys, H. 1964, Quarterly J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 5, 10.Google Scholar
  18. Joy, A.H. 1942, Publ. Astr. Soc. Pacific 54, 35.Google Scholar
  19. Kondo, Y., McCluskey, G.E. and Stencel, R.E. 1980, Astrophys. J. 233, 906.Google Scholar
  20. Kopal, Z. 1957, in Non-Stable Stars ed. G.H. Herbig, Cambridge Univ. Press, p. 123.Google Scholar
  21. Kopal, Z. 1959, Close Binary Systems, Chapman and Hall London, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  22. Kopal, Z. 1971, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 83, 521.Google Scholar
  23. Kopal, Z. 1978, Dynamics of Close Binary Systems, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, Chap. 8.Google Scholar
  24. Kruszewski, A. 1964, Acta Astr. 14, 214.Google Scholar
  25. Kuiper, G.P. 1941, Astrophys. J. 93, 133.Google Scholar
  26. Lubow, S.H. and Shu, F.H. 1975, Astrophys. J. 198, 383.Google Scholar
  27. Mayer, C. 1779, De novis in Coelo Sidereo Phaenominis in miris Stellarum fixarum Comitibus.Google Scholar
  28. Michell, J. 1767, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 57, 234.Google Scholar
  29. Paczynski, B. 1971, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 9, 183.Google Scholar
  30. Parthasarathy, M., Lambert, D.L. and Tomkin, J. 1983, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 203, 1063.Google Scholar
  31. Plavec, M. 1970, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 82, 957.Google Scholar
  32. Plavec, M. 1973, in Extended Atmospheres and Circumstellar Matter in Close Binary Systems, I.A.U. Symp. 52 ed. A.H. Batten, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, p. 216.Google Scholar
  33. Plavec, M.J. 1983, Astrophys. J. 275, 251.Google Scholar
  34. Prendergast, K.H. and Taam, R.E. 1974, Astrophys. J. 189, 125.Google Scholar
  35. Struve, O. 1949, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 109, 487.Google Scholar
  36. Tinsley, B.M. 1980, Fundamentals of Cosmic Phys. 5, 287.Google Scholar
  37. Vogel, H.C. 1789, Sitzungsber. Prüss. Akad. p. 1045.Google Scholar
  38. Walter, K. 1931, Veröff. Königsberg Sternw. No. 2.Google Scholar
  39. Wood, F.B. 1950, Astrophys. J. 112, 196.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan H. Batten
    • 1
  1. 1.Dominion Astrophysical Observatory Herzberg Institute of AstrophysicsVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations