Mercury levels and its chemical form in tissues and organs of seabirds

  • E. Y. Kim
  • T. Murakami
  • K. Saeki
  • R. Tatsukawa
Article

Abstract

Liver, muscle, kidney, and feather samples from nine species of seabirds were analyzed for total and organic (methyl) mercury (MM). Total mercury (TM) levels in liver showed great intra- and inter-species variations, with the concentrations varied from 306 μg/g (dry weight) in black-footed albatross (Diomedea nigripes) to 4.9 μg/g in arctic tern (Sterna paradisaea), while MM levels were less relatively variable. The order of MM concentrations in tissues of all the seabirds except oldsquaw (Clangula hyemalis) was as follows: liver > kidney > muscle. The mean percentage of MM in total was 35%, 36%, and 66% in liver, kidney, and muscle, respectively, for all the species. Statistically significant negative correlations were found between the proportion of MM to TM and concentrations of TM in the liver and muscle of black-footed albatross and in the liver of laysan albatross. Furthermore, the percentage of MM decreased with an increase in TM concentrations in the liver, muscle, and kidney of all the species. Black-footed albatross had the highest concentration and burden of mercury in the liver, wherein more than 70% of the TM occurred as inorganic mercury. On the other hand, the mercury burdens in feathers were less than 10% of the body burdens, indicating that excretion of mercury by moulting is negligible. The results suggest that some seabirds are capable of demethylating MM in the tissues (mainly in liver), and store mercury as an immobilizable inorganic form in the liver. It is noteworthy that the species with a high degree of demethylation capacity and slow moulting pattern showed low mercury burdens in feathers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderlini VC, Connors PG, Risebrough RW, Martin JH (1972) Concentrations of heavy metals in some Antarctic and North American seabirds. Proc Symp Conservation Problems Antarctica, pp 49–62Google Scholar
  2. Braune BM, Gaskin DE (1987) Mercury levels in Bonaparte's Gulls (Larus philadelphia) during autumn molt in the Quoddy region, New Brunswick, Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 16:539–549Google Scholar
  3. Burger J, Cooper K, Saliva J, Gochfeld D, Lipsky D, Gochfeld M (1992) Mercury bioaccumulation in organisms from three Puerto Rican estuaries. Environ Monit Asses 22:181–197Google Scholar
  4. Burger J, Gochfeld D (1991) Lead, mercury, and cadmium in feathers of Tropical Terns in Puerto Rico and Australia. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 21:311–315Google Scholar
  5. Burger J, Cooper K, Saliva J, Gochfeld D, Lipsky D, Gochfeld M (1992) Mercury bioaccumulation in organisms from three Puerto Rican estuaries. Environ Monit Asses 22:181–197Google Scholar
  6. Burger J, Gochfeld D (1993) Heavy metal and selenium levels in feathers of young egrets and herons from Hong Kong and Szechuan, China Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 25:322–327Google Scholar
  7. Denneman WD, Douben PET (1993) Trace metals in primary feathers of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba guttatus) in the Netherlands. Environ Pollut 82:301–310Google Scholar
  8. Dietz R, Nielsen CO, Hansen MM, Hansen CT (1990) Organic mercury in Greenland birds and mammals. Sci Total Environ 95:41–51Google Scholar
  9. Falconer CR, Davies IM, Topping G (1983) Trace metals in the common porpoise, Phocoena phocoena. Mar Environ Res 8:119–127Google Scholar
  10. Fimreite N (1974) Mercury contamination of aquatic birds in northwestern Ontario. J Wildl Manage 38:120–131Google Scholar
  11. Freeman HC, Horne DA (1973) Mercury in Canadian seals. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 10:172–180Google Scholar
  12. Furness RW, Muirhead SJ, Woodburn M (1986) Using bird feathers to measure mercury in the environment: Relationships between mercury content and molt. Mar Pollut Bull 17:27–30Google Scholar
  13. Gaskin DE, Stonefield KI, Suda P, Frank R (1979) Changes in mercury levels in harbour porpoises from the Bay of Fundy, Canada and adjacent waters during 1969–1977. Arch Environ Contam Toxical 8:733–762Google Scholar
  14. Honda K, Marcovecchio JE, Kan S, Tatsukawa R, Ogi H (1990). Metal concentrations in pelagic seabirds from the north Pacific Ocean. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 19:704–711Google Scholar
  15. Honda K, Nasu T, Tatsukawa R (1986) Seasonal changes in mercury accumulation in the Black-eared Kite, Milvus migrans lineatus. Environ Pollut (Series A) 42:325–334Google Scholar
  16. Hutton M (1981) Accumulation of heavy metals and selenium in three seabird species from the United Kingdom. Environ Pollut (A)26:129–145Google Scholar
  17. Koeman JH, Garssen-Hoekstra J, Pels E, deGoeij JJM (1971) Poisoning of birds of prey by methyl mercury compounds. Meded Rijksfac Landbouwwet Gent 36:43–49Google Scholar
  18. Koeman JH, Peters WHM, Smit CJ, Tjioe PS, Goeif JJM de (1972) Persistent chemicals in marine mammals. TNO-Nieuws 27:570–578Google Scholar
  19. Koeman JH, Peters WHM, Koudstaal-Hol CHM, Tjioe PS, Goeij JJM de (1973) Mercury-selenium correlations in marine mammals. Nature 245:385–386Google Scholar
  20. Koeman JH, Ven WSM van de, Goeij JJM de, Tjioe PS, Haaften JL van (1975) Mercury and selenium in marine mammals and birds. Sci Total Environ 3:279–287Google Scholar
  21. Lock JW, Thompson DR, Furness RW, Bartle JA (1992) Metal concentrations in seabirds of the New Zealand region. Environ Pollut 75:289–300Google Scholar
  22. Muirhead SJ, Furness RW (1988) Heavy metals concentrations in the tissues of seabirds from Gough island, South Atlantic Ocean. Mar Pollut Bull 19:278–283Google Scholar
  23. Nelson JB (1979) Seabirds: Their biology and behavior. A&W Publishers, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Norheim G, Froslie A (1978) The degree of methylation and organ distribution of mercury in some birds of prey in Norway. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 43:196–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Norheim G, Somme L, Holt G (1982) Mercury and persistent chlorinated hydrocarbons in Antarctic birds from Bouvetoya and Dronning Maud Land. Environ Pollut (A) 28:233–240Google Scholar
  26. Norseth T, Clarkson TW (1970) Studies on the biotransformation of Hg-labelled methylmercuric chloride in rats. Arch Environ Health 21:717–727Google Scholar
  27. Ogi H (1986) Report on “Umidori taisaku tyosa itaku jigyo.” Fisheries Agency of Japan 112 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  28. Osborn D, Harris MP, Nicholson JK (1979) Comparative tissue distribution of mercury, cadmium, and zinc in three species of pelagic seabirds. Comp Biochem Physiol 46C:61–67Google Scholar
  29. Smith TG, Armstrong FAJ (1978) Mercury and selenium in ringed and bearded seal tissues from Arctic Canada. Arctic 31:75–84Google Scholar
  30. Thompson DR, Furness RW (1989a) Comparison of the levels of total and organic mercury in seabird feathers. Mar Pollut Bull 20:577–579Google Scholar
  31. — (1989b) The chemical form of mercury stored in South Atlantic seabirds. Environ Pollut 60:305–317Google Scholar
  32. Thompson DR, Stewart FM, Furness RW (1990) Using seabirds to monitor mercury in marine environments: The validity of conversion ratios for tissue comparisons. Mar Pollut Bull 21:339–342Google Scholar
  33. Uthe JF, Solomon J, Grift B (1972) Rapid semimicro method for the determination of methyl mercury in fish tissue. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 55:583–589Google Scholar
  34. Yamamoto R, Naganuma A, Imura N, Suzuki T, Hisamichi J (1983) Interaction of inorganic mercury and selenium in rat kidney. J Toxicol Sci 8:328Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Y. Kim
    • 1
  • T. Murakami
    • 1
  • K. Saeki
    • 1
  • R. Tatsukawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environment ConservationEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations