Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 175, Issue 2, pp 171–177 | Cite as

Approaching and departing bees learn different cues to the distance of a landmark

  • M. Lehrer
  • T. S. Collett
Original Paper

Abstract

Bees learn both the absolute distance and the apparent size of landmarks in the vicinity of a foraging site. They learn about landmarks both when approaching and when leaving the site. Whereas learning on arrival can take place on every visit to the food source, learning on departure is limited to the first few visits, when the bee Turns Back and Looks (TBL) at the feeder in a stereotyped manoeuvre before flying off. We investigated whether one specific function of TBLs is to acquire information about the absolute distance of landmarks from the feeding site. Bees were trained to forage from a feeder which lay at a fixed distance from a cylinder. During training, bees were exposed to the cylinder either only while they approached and landed on the feeder, or only on their departure from it, or at both of these times. Tests on trained bees immediately after the TBL phase revealed that those bees which had viewed the cylinder only on arrival had learnt the apparent size of the cylinder, but not its distance from the feeder. In contrast, bees which saw the cylinder on departure had learnt its absolute distance. They also learnt the cylinder's apparent size, provided that the cylinder was close to the feeder. Bees which had viewed the cylinder on arrival as well as on departure learnt both absolute distance and apparent size. Distance dominated the bees' behaviour in the initial phase of learning, apparent size was more important later on. We suggest that early during learning bees need information about the 3-D structure of the environment so that they can identify those landmarks close to a foraging site which will specify accurately the site's position. This information is acquired during TBLs. Later, landmark guidance can be achieved by 2-D image matching.

Key words

Honeybee Behaviour Orientation flights Distance learning Size learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1979) How honey-bees know their distance from a near-by visual landmark. J Exp Biol 82: 367–372Google Scholar
  2. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1983) Landmark learning in bees: experiments and models. J Comp Physiol 121: 521–543Google Scholar
  3. Cheng K, Collett TS, Pickhard A, Wehner R (1987) The use of visual landmarks by honeybees: Bees weight landmarks according to their distance from the goal. J Comp Physiol A 161: 469–475Google Scholar
  4. Collett TS, Lehrer M (1993) Looking and Learning: a spatial pattern in the orientation flight of the wasp Vespula vulgaris. Proc R Soc Lond B 252: 129–134Google Scholar
  5. Couvillon PA, Bitterman ME (1992) Landmark learning by honeybees. J Insect Behav 5: 123–129Google Scholar
  6. Couvillon PA, Leiato TG, Bitterman ME (1991) Learning by honeybees (Apis mellifera) on arrival at and departure from a feeding place. J Comp Psychol 105: 177–184Google Scholar
  7. Gould JL (1988) Timing of landmark learning by honeybees. J Insect Behav 1: 373–378Google Scholar
  8. Iersel JJA van, Assem J van den (1964) Aspects of orientation in the digger wasp Bembix rostrata. Animal Behav Suppl 1: 145–162Google Scholar
  9. Lehrer M (1991) Bees which turn back and look. Naturwissenschaften 78: 274–276Google Scholar
  10. Lehrer M (1993) Why do bees turn back and look? J Comp Physiol A 172: 544–563Google Scholar
  11. Lehrer M, Collect TS (1993) When do bees learn what about distance? Proc 21st Göttingen Neurobiol Conf. G Thieme, Stuttgart New York, p 843Google Scholar
  12. Lehrer M, Srinivasan M, Zhang SW, Horridge GA (1988) Motion cues provide the bee's visual world with a third dimension. Nature (Lond) 332: 356–357Google Scholar
  13. Menzel R (1968) Das Gedächtnis der Honigbienen für Spektralfarben. I. Kurzzeitiges und langzeitiges Behalten. Z Vergl Physiol 60: 82–102Google Scholar
  14. Opfinger E (1931) Über die Orientierung der Honigbiene an der Futterquelle. Z Vergl Physiol 15: 431–487Google Scholar
  15. Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M, Kirchner W, Zhang SW (1991) Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying honeybees. Visual Neurosci 6: 519–536Google Scholar
  16. Vollbehr J (1975) Zur Orientierung junger Honigbienen bei ihrem ersten Orientierungsflug. Zool JB Allg Zool Physiol 79: 33–69Google Scholar
  17. Wehner R (1981) Spatial vision in arthropods. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, VII/6C. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 287–616Google Scholar
  18. Wehner R, Raeber F (1979) Visual spatial memory in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Experientia 35: 1569–1571Google Scholar
  19. Zeil J (1993a) Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris; Sphecidae; Hymenoptera): I. Description of flight. J Comp Physiol A 172: 189–205Google Scholar
  20. Zeil J (1993b) Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris; Sphecidae; Hymenoptera): II. Similarity between orientation and return flights and the use of motion parallax. J Comp Physiol A 172: 209–224Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Lehrer
    • 1
  • T. S. Collett
    • 2
  1. 1.Zoological Institute, University of ZürichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Sussex Centre for Neuroscience, School of Biological Sciences, University of SussexBrightonEngland

Personalised recommendations