Advertisement

Mercury accumulation in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) in a Florida Lake

  • T. R. Lange
  • H. E. Royals
  • L. L. Connor
Article

Abstract

Rates of mercury accumulation were examined in male and female largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) from Lake Tohopekaliga, Florida, to establish methods for fish consumption advisories for the protection of human health. In addition, concentrations were determined in five lower trophic level fish species. Total mercury concentrations in adult largemouth bass muscle tissue ranged from 0.16 to 1.10 μg/g (fresh weight) and increased as fish increased in size and age. Wholebody mercury concentrations of 1990 year-class largemouth bass increased from 0.05 μg/g at 20 mm and to 0.32 μg/g at 320 mm (age 2). Significant differences were found in the rates of accumulation between sexes for length and weight, but not for age. Therefore, standardized mercury concentrations were determined using bass age to make comparisons among sampling dates. Although there were significant differences in adjusted mean mercury concentrations among two sampling dates, mercury content of standard-age bass remained relatively constant over time. Largemouth bass exceed the Florida Health Advisory level for limited consumption of fish (0.50 μg Hg/g) based on a mean concentration of 0.59 μg/g for 64 bass. Advisories based on fish morphological characteristics (i.e., length, weight) or age are not possible for Lake Tohopekaliga due to differences in mercury accumulation in male and female bass. Lower trophic level species of sport fish did not exceed the limited consumption level.

Keywords

Mercury Concentration Largemouth Bass Lower Trophic Level Total Mercury Concentration Micropterus Salmoides 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allard M, Stokes PM (1989) Mercury in crayfish species from thirteen Ontario lakes in relation to water chemistry and smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui) mercury. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1040–1046Google Scholar
  2. Bigler J, Greene A (1993) Guidance for assessing chemical contaminant data for use in fish advisories. Vol. 1. Fish sampling and analysis. EPA 823-R-93–002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloom NS (1992) On the chemical form of mercury in edible fish and marine invertebrate tissue. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1010–1017Google Scholar
  4. Bodaly RA, Rudd JWM, Fudge RJP, Kelly CA (1993) Mercury concentrations in fish related to size of remote canadian shield lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:980–987Google Scholar
  5. Cope WG, Wiener JG, Rada RG (1990) Mercury accumulation in yellow perch in Wisconsin seepage lakes: Relation to lake characteristics. Environ Toxicol Chem 9:931–940Google Scholar
  6. Eisler R (1987) Mercury hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review. Biological Report 85(1.10). US Fish and Wild-life Service, Washington, DC, 90 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Greib TM, Driscoll CT, Gloss SP, Schofield CL, Bowie GL, Porcella DB (1990) Factors affecting mercury accumulation in fish in the upper Michigan peninsula. Environ Toxicol Chem 9:919–930Google Scholar
  8. Hakanson L, Nilsson A, Andersson T (1988) Mercury in fish in Swedish lakes. Environ Pollut 49:145–162Google Scholar
  9. Laarman PW, Willford WA, Olson JR (1976) Retention of mercury in the muscle of yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and rock bass (Ambloplities rupestris). Trans Am Fish Soc 105:296–300.Google Scholar
  10. Lange TL, Royals HE, Connor LL (1993) Influence of water chemistry on mercury concentration in largemouth bass from Florida lakes. Trans Am Fish Soc 122:74–84Google Scholar
  11. McMurtry MJ, Wales DL, Scheider WA, Beggs GL, Dimond PE (1989) Relationship of mercury concentrations in lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) and smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui) to the physical and chemical characteristics of Ontario lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:426–434Google Scholar
  12. MacCrimmon HR, Wren CD, Gots BL (1983) Mercury uptake by lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush), relative to age, growth, and diet in Tadenac Lake with comparative data from other Precambrium shield lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:114–120Google Scholar
  13. Mathers RA, Johansen PH (1985) The effects of feeding ecology on mercury accumulation in walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) and pike (Esox lucius) in Lake Simcoe. Can J Zool 63:2006–2012Google Scholar
  14. McKim JM, Olson GF, Holcombe GW, Hunt EP (1979) Long-term effects of methylmercuric chloride on three generations of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis): Toxicity, accumulation, distribution, and elimination. J Fish Res Board Can 33:2726–2739Google Scholar
  15. Olsen KR, Bergmann HL, Fromm PO (1973) Uptake of methyl mercuric chloride and mercuric chloride by trout: A study of uptake pathways into the whole animal and uptake by erythrocytes in vitro. J Fish Res Board Can 30:1293–1299Google Scholar
  16. Phillips GR, Buhler DR (1978) The relative contributions of methylmercury from food or water to rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in a controlled laboratory environment. Trans Am Fish Soc 107:853–861Google Scholar
  17. Phillips GR, Gregory RW (1979) Assimilation efficiency of dietary methylmercury by northern pike (Esox lucius). J Fish Res Board Can 36:1516–1519Google Scholar
  18. Porak W, Coleman WS, Crawford S (1988) Age, growth, and mortality of Florida largemouth bass utilizing otoliths. Proc Annu Conf SE Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 40:206–215Google Scholar
  19. Potter L, Kidd D, Standiford D (1975) Mercury levels in Lake Powell, bioamplification of mercury in man-made desert reservoir. Environ Sci Technol 9:41–46Google Scholar
  20. Reinhart RE, Knuth BA, Kamrin MA, Stober QJ (1991) Risk assessment, risk management, and fish consumption advisories in the United States. Fisheries 16:5–12Google Scholar
  21. Rogers DW, Watson TA, Langan JS (1987) Effects of pH and feeding regime on methyl mercury accumulation within aquatic microcosms. Environ Pollut 45:261–274Google Scholar
  22. Sorensen JA, Glass GE, Schmidt KW, Huber JK, Rapp GR Jr (1990) Airborne mercury deposition and watershed characteristics in relation to mercury concentration in water, sediments, plankton, and fish of eighty Northern Minnesota lakes. Environ Sci Technol 24:1716–1727Google Scholar
  23. Spry DJ, Wiener JG (1991) Metal bioavailability and toxicity to fish in low-alkalinity lakes: A critical review. Environ Pollut 71:243–304Google Scholar
  24. Turner MA, Swick AL (1983) The English-Wabigoon river system. IV. Interactions between mercury and selenium accumulated from water borne and dietary sources by northern pike (Esox lucius). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:2241–2250Google Scholar
  25. Ware FJ, Royals HE, Lange TR (1990) Mercury contamination of FLorida largemouth bass. Proc Annu Conf SE Assoc Fish Wild Agencies 44:5–12Google Scholar
  26. Watras CJ, Bloom NS (1992) Mercury and methylmercury in individual zooplankton: Implications for bioaccumulation. Limnol Ocean 37:1313–1318Google Scholar
  27. Wiener JG (1987) Metal contamination of fish in low-Ph lakes and potential implications for piscivorous wildlife. Trans North Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 52:645–657Google Scholar
  28. Wren CD, MacCrimmon HR (1986) Comparative bioaccumulation of mercury in two adjacent freshwater ecosystems. Water Res 20:763–769Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. Lange
    • 1
  • H. E. Royals
    • 1
  • L. L. Connor
    • 1
  1. 1.Florida Game and Freshwater Fish CommissionEustis Fisheries Research LaboratoryEustisUSA

Personalised recommendations