World Journal of Urology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 173–178 | Cite as

Deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy in the irradiated prostate

  • R. W. deVere White
  • A. D. Deitch
  • G. M. Meyer-Haass
  • D. B. Siders
  • F. Lee
Free Paper

Summary

A retrospective study was performed to determine whether the ploidy of localized prostate cancer was correlated with the response to radiation therapy. Prostate tissue was obtained from 69 patients prior to and at least 22 months following definitive radiation therapy. A positive postradiation biopsy of a hypoechoic lesion obtained under transrectal ultrasound guidance was taken as evidence of a failure to respond to therapy. Only 20% of these patients had negative posttherapy biopsies. This poor response rate was similar, regardless of whether the pretreatment tumor was diploid or aneuploid. Treatment failure was correlated with an increased incidence of aneuploid histograms after therapy. Prior to therapy, 80% of the tumors were diploid; after therapy, only 56% were diploid, whereas nontetraploid-aneuploid tumors had increased 3-fold. Among 44 patients who had diploid tumors prior to therapy, the residual prostate cancer was tetraploid in five cases and nontetraploid-aneuploid in ten cases.

Keywords

Public Health Radiation Therapy Prostate Cancer Retrospective Study Treatment Failure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T (1991) Cancer statistics, 1991. CA 41:19–36Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yatani R, Cigasa K, Stemmerman SN (1982) Geographic pathology of latent prostatic carcinoma. Int J Cancer 33:223Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johansson JE, Anderson SO, Krusemo UB, Adami H-O, Bergstrom R, Kraaz W (1989) Natural history of localized prostate cancer. Lancet I:799Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McIntire TL, Murphy WM, Coon JS, Chandler RW, Schwartz D, Conway S, Weinstein RS (1988) The prognostic value of DNA ploidy combined with histological substaging for incidental carcinoma of the prostate gland. Am J Clin Pathol 89:370Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Montgomery BT, Nativ O, Blute ML, Farrow GM, Myers RP, Zincke H, Therneau JM, Lieber MM (1990) Stage B prostate adenocarcinoma. Flow cytometric nuclear DNA ploidy analysis. Arch Surg 125:327Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tribukait B (1988) Rapid-flow cytometry of prostatic fine needle aspiration biopsies. In: Karr JP, Coffey DS, Gardner W Jr (eds) Prognostic cytometry and cytopathology of prostate cancer. Elsevier, New York, pp 236–242Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kokol WA, Gardine RL, Sheibani K, Zak IW, Beatty JD, Riihimaki DU, Wagman LD, Terz JJ (1988) Tumor DNA content as a prognostic indicator in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region. Am J Surg 156:276Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Franzen G, Klintenberg C, Olofsson J, Risberg B (1988) DNA measurement — an objective predictor of response to irradiation? A review of 24 squamous cell carcinomas of the oral activity. Br J Cancer 53:643Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee F, Torp-Pedersen S, Mieselman L, Siders DB, Littrup P, Dorr RP, Pauli FJ (1988) Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of local disease after I125 seed implanation for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 15:1453Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee F, Torp-Pedersen ST, Siders DB, Littrup PJ, McLeary RD (1989) Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. Radiology 170:609Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hedley DW, Friedlander IW, Taylor CA, Rugg CA, Musgrove EA (1983) Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 31:1333Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deitch AD, Law H, deVere White R (1982) A stable propidium iodide staining procedure for flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 30:967Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee SE, Currin SM, Paulson DF, Walther PJ (1988) Flow cytometric determination of ploidy in prostatic adenocarcinoma: a comparison with seminal vesical involvement and histopathological grading as a predictor of clinical recurrence. J Urol 140:769Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nativ O, Winkler HZ, Raz Y, Therneau TM, Farrow GM, Myers RP, Zincke H, Lieber MM (1989) Stage C prostatic adenocarcinoma: flow cytometric nuclear DNA ploidy analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 64:911Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Winkler JZ, Rainwater LM, Myers RP, Farrow GM, Therneau TM, Zincke H, Lieber MM (1988) Stage D1 prostatic adenocarcinoma: significance of nuclear DNA ploidy patterns studied by flow cytometry. Mayo Clin Proc 632:103Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scardino PT, Frankel JM, Wheeler TM, Meacham RB, Hoffman GS, Seale C, Wilbanks JH, Easley J, Carlton CE Jr (1986) The prognostic significance of post-irradiation biopsy results in patients with prostatic cancer. J Urol 135:510Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paulson DF (1989) Treatment selection in patients with prostatic carcinoma. In: Paulson DF (ed) Prostatic disorders. Lea and Feberger, Philadelphia, pp 287–304Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bagshaw MA, Cox RS, Ray GR (1988) Status of radiation treatment of prostate cancer at Stanford University. NCI Monog 7:47Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    MeyerHaass GM, Lee F, deVere White R, Siders DB, Schmitter SP, McHugh TA (1989) Transrectal ultrasound, digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen and DNA ploidy in the irradiated prostate (abstract). Proceedings, 4th International Symposium on Transectal Ultrasound, Chicago, September 14–16Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kabalin JN, Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Stamey TA (1989) Identification of residual cancer in the prostate after radiation therapy: role of transrectal ultrasound and prostate specific antigen (abstract). Proceedings, Meeting of the American Urological Association, New Orleans, May 7–11Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greenebraum E, Koss LG, Sherman AB, Elequin F (1984) Comparison of needle aspiration and solid biopsy techniques in the flow cytometric studies of DNA distributions of surgically resected tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 82:559Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. W. deVere White
    • 1
  • A. D. Deitch
    • 1
  • G. M. Meyer-Haass
    • 2
  • D. B. Siders
    • 2
  • F. Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity of California, DavisSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.St. Joseph Mercy HospitalAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations