Mercury in livers of wading birds (ciconiiformes) in southern Florida

  • S. F. Sundlof
  • M. G. Spalding
  • J. D. Wentworth
  • C. K. Steible
Article

Abstract

Mercury was measured in livers from 144 wading birds representing seven species collected from four different areas in southern Flordia, including the Everglades National Park. Significant differences in hepatic mercury concentrations were identified between birds collected from different geographic locations, birds of different ages, dietary factors, and relative amounts of body fat. Birds collected from an area encompassing the central Everglades and eastern Florida Bay had significantly greater concentrations of hepatic mercury than did birds from other collection areas. Livers from fledgling and young adult birds contained approximately three times the concentration of mercury as livers from nestling birds. Bird species whose prey base consists of larger fish were found to have approximately four times the hepatic concentration of mercury as did those species which consume smaller fish or crustaceans. Birds with minimal to moderate amounts of body fat had two to three times the concentration of hepatic mercury as birds with relatively abundant body fat reserves. Four great blue herons collected from the central Everglades contained liver mercury at concentrations typically associated with overt neurologic signs (⩾30 μg/g). Between 30% and 80% of potential breeding-age birds collected from this area contained hepatic mercury at concentrations associated with reproductive impairment in ducks and pheasants. These data suggest that declining numbers of nesting ciconiiform birds in Florida may be due, in part, to mecury contamination of their food supply.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burger J (1993) Metals in feathers of brown noddy (Anous stolidus): Evidence for bioaccumulation or exposure levels? Environ Monit Assess 24:181–187Google Scholar
  2. Burger J, Parsons K, Benson T, Shukla T, Rothstein D, Gochfeld M (1992) Heavy metal and selenium levels in young cattle egrets from nesting colonies in the northeastern United States, Puerto Rico, and Egypt. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 23:435–439Google Scholar
  3. Cabbage H (1989) State Scientists Battle Mercury Contamination. Florida Wildl 43(3):6–7Google Scholar
  4. Clarkson TW, Marsh DO (1982) Mercury toxicity in man. In: JO Prasad (ed) Clinical, biochemical and nutritional aspects of trace elements, Vol. 6. Alan R Liss, Inc, NY, pp 549–568Google Scholar
  5. Collopy MW, Jelks HL (1989) Distribution and foraging: Wading birds in relation to the physical and biological characteristics of freshwater wetlands in Southwest Florida. Final Report Number GFC-85–003. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, Nongame Program, Tallahassee, FLGoogle Scholar
  6. Delfino JJ, Crisman JF, Gottgens JF, Rood BE, Earle CD (1993) Spatial and temporal distribution of mercury in Everglades and Okefenokee wetland sediments. Final project report: April 1, 1991–June 30, 1993. Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  7. Dustman EH, Stickel LF, Elder JB (1972) Mercury in wild animals, Lake St. Clair, 1970. In: R. Hartung and BB Dinman (eds) Environmental mercury contamination. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 46–52Google Scholar
  8. Eisler R (1987) Mercury hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: A synoptic review. US Wildl Serv Biol Rep 85(1.10), 90 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans HL, Kostyniak PJ (1972) Effects of chronic methylmercury on behavior and tissue mercury levels in the pigeon. Fed Proc 31:A1956, Atlantic City, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Faber RA, Risebrough RW, Pratt HM (1972) Organochlorines and mercury in common egrets and great blue herons. Environ Pollut 3:111–122Google Scholar
  11. Fimreite N (1971) Effects of dietary methylmercury on ring-necked pheasants. Can Wildl Serv Occas Pap 9:5–37Google Scholar
  12. Fimreite N (1974) Mercury contamination of aquatic birds in northwestern Ontario. J. Wildl Manage 38:120–131Google Scholar
  13. Frank R, Lumsden H, Barr JF, Braun HE (1983) Residues of organochlorine insecticides, industrial chemicals, and mercury in eggs and tissues take from healthy and emaciated common loons, Ontario, Canada, 1968–1980. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 12:641–654Google Scholar
  14. Grissom RE, Thaxton JP (1985) Onset of mercury toxicity in young chickens. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 14:193–196Google Scholar
  15. Hand J, Friedemann M (1990) Mercury, largemouth bass, and water quality: A preliminary report. Department of Environmental Regulation, State of Florida, Tallahassee, FLGoogle Scholar
  16. Heinz GH (1974) Effects of low dietary levels of methyl mercury mallard reproduction. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 11:386–392Google Scholar
  17. Heinz GH (1979) Methyl mercury: Reproductive and behavioral effects in three generations of Mallard ducks. J Wildl Manage 43:394–401Google Scholar
  18. Hesse LW, Brown RL, Heisinger JF (1975) Mercury contamination of birds from a polluted watershed. J Wildl Manage 39:299–304Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman RD, Curnow RC (1979) Mercury in herons, egrets, and their foods. J Wildl Manage 43:85–93Google Scholar
  20. Honda K, Byung YM, Tatsukawa R (1986) Distribution of heavy metals and their age-related changes in the eastern great white egret, Egretta alba modesta, in Korea. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 15:185–197Google Scholar
  21. Jordan D (1990) Mercury contamination: Another threat to the Florida panther. Endangered Species Technical Bulletin, Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 15(2):1–2, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Jurczyk NU (1993) An ecological risk assessment of the impact of mercury contamination in the Florida Everglades. Masters Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  23. KBN Engineering and Applied Sciences Inc (1992) Mercury emissions to the atmosphere in Florida. Final report to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, August 1992, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  24. Ogden JC (1994) A comparison of wading bird nesting dynamics, 1931–1946 and 1974–1989, as an indication of ecosystem conditions in the southern Everglades. In: Davis S, Ogden JC, (eds), Everglades, spatial and temporal patterns as guidelines for ecosystem restoration, University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FL pp 533–570Google Scholar
  25. Robertson WB, Kushlan JA (1984) The southern Florida avifauna. In: Gleason PJ (ed) Environmentals of south Florida: Past and present II. Miami Geological Society, Coral Gables, FL, pp 219–257Google Scholar
  26. Roelke ME, Schultz DP, Facemire CF, Sundlof SF, Royals HE (1991) Mercury contamination in Florida panthers, Report of the Florida Panther Technical Subcommittee to the Florida Panther Interagency Committee, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  27. Royals H, Lange T (1990) Mercury in Florida fish and wildlife. Florida Wildlife 44(2):3–6Google Scholar
  28. Runde DE (1991) Trends in wading bird nesting populations in Florida 1976–1978 and 1986–1989. Final Performance Report. Florida Game and Fresh Water Commission, Nongame Progam, Tallahasse, FL Survey #7612, Tallahassee, FLGoogle Scholar
  29. Scheuhammer AM (1991) Effects of acidification on the availability of toxic metals and calcium to wild birds and mammals. Environ Pollut 71:329–375Google Scholar
  30. Spalding MG, Bjork RD, Powell GVN, Sundlof SF (in press) Mercury contamination and cause of death in free-ranging great white herons.Google Scholar
  31. Van Der Molen EJ, Blok AA, De Graff GJ (1982) Winter starvation and mercury intoxication in gray herons Ardea cinerea in the Netherlands. Ardea 70:173–184Google Scholar
  32. Wren CD, Hunter DB, Leatherland JF, Stokes PM (1987) The effects of polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury, singly and in combination, on mink: Uptake and toxic responses. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 16:441–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. F. Sundlof
    • 1
  • M. G. Spalding
    • 2
  • J. D. Wentworth
    • 1
  • C. K. Steible
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Statistics, Institute of Food and Agricultural SciencesUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations