Relative sensitivity of three freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates to ten contaminants

  • G. L. Phipps
  • V. R. Mattson
  • G. T. Ankley
Article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the suitability of Hyalella azteca, Chironomus tentans and Lumbriculus variegatus as representative species for the assessment of sediment toxicity. Ten chemicals were tested at the U.S. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth, always using H. azteca and C. tentans and, occasionally, L. variegatus. The exposures were water-only, flow-through tests with measured chemical concentrations, which were conducted for 10 days in Lake Superior water. Chemicals tested included five metals (copper, lead, zinc, nickel, cadmium) and five pesticides (chlorpyrifos, dieldrin, p,p′-DDD, p,p′-DDE, p,p′-DDT). The amphipod was quite sensitive to the metals, while the midge often was exceptionally sensitive to the pesticides. No one of the three species was most (or least) sensitive to the toxicants. Toxicity of the contaminants to the three species was compared to the genus mean acute and chronic data found in U.S. EPA Water Quality Criteria (WQC) documents, as well as information from the AQUIRE database. The results of these comparisons indicated that the three species reasonably represent the range of sensitivities of other aquatic test species, and occasionally are among the most sensitive species when compared to others in the WQC database.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ankley GT, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Dierkes JR (1991a) Predicting the toxicity of bulk sediments to aquatic organisms with aqueous test fractions: Pore water versus elutriate. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:1359–1366Google Scholar
  2. Ankley GT, Phipps GL, Leonard EN, Benoit DA, Mattson VR, Kosian PA, Cotter AM, Dierkes JR, Hansen DJ, Mahony JD (1991b) Acid volatile sulfide as a factor mediating cadmium and nickel bioavailability in contaminated sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:1299–1307Google Scholar
  3. Ankley GT, Cook PM, Carlson AR, Call DJ, Swenson JA, Corcoran HF, Hoke RA (1992) Bioaccumulation of PCBs from sediments by oligochaetes and fishes: Comparison of laboratory and field studies. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 49:2080–2085Google Scholar
  4. Ankley GT, Benoit DA, Hoke RA, Leonard EN, West CW, Phipps GL, Mattson VR, Anderson LA (1993) Development and evaluation of test methods for benthic invertebrates and sediments: Effects of flow rate and feeding on water quality and exposure conditions. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 25:12–19Google Scholar
  5. Ankley GT, Call DJ, Cox JS, Kahl MD, Hoke RA Kosian PA (1994) Organic carbon partitioning as a basis for predicting the toxicity of chlorpyrifos in sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 13:621–626Google Scholar
  6. American Society for Testing and Materials (1992) New standard guide for conducting solid phase sediment toxicity tests with freshwater invertebrates. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Vol 11.04, E1383–92. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  7. Benoit DA, Mattson VR, Olson DL (1982) A continuous-flow minidiluter system for toxicity testing. Water Res 16:457–464Google Scholar
  8. Borgmann V, Ralph KM, Norwood WP (1989) Toxicity test procedures for Hyalella azteca and chronic toxicity of cadmium and pentachlorophenol to H. azteca, Gammarus fasciatus, and Daphnia magna. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 18:756–764Google Scholar
  9. Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 333 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton MA, Russo RC, Thurston RV (1977) Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimated median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ Sci Technol 7:714–719 Correction: 12:417 (1978)Google Scholar
  11. Hoke RA, Kosian PA, Ankley GT, Cotter AM, VanderMeiden FM, Phipps GL, Durhan EJ (1994a) Check studies with Hyalella azteca and Chironomus tentans in support of a sediment quality criterion for dieldrin. Environ Toxicol Chem (in press)Google Scholar
  12. Hoke RA, Ankley GT, Cotter AM, Goldenstein T, Kosian PA, Phipps GL, VanderMeiden FM (1994b) Evaluation of equilibrium partitioning theory for predicting the acute toxicity of field-collected sediments contaminated with DDT, DDE and DDD to the amphipod, Hyalella azteca. Environ Toxicol Chem 13:157–166Google Scholar
  13. Nebeker AV, Cairns MA, Gakstatter JH, Malueg KW, Schuytema GS, Krawcyzk DF (1984) Biological methods for determining toxicity of contaminated sediments to invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 3:617–630Google Scholar
  14. Phipps GL, Ankley GT, Benoit DA, Mattson VR (1993) Use of the aquatic oligochaete Lumbriculus variegatus for assessing the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:269–279Google Scholar
  15. Schubauer-Berigan MK, Ankley GT (1991) The contribution of ammonia, metals and nonpolar organic compounds to the toxicity of sediment interstitial water from an Illinois River tributary. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:925–940Google Scholar
  16. Schubauer-Berigan MK, Dierkes JR, Monson PD, Ankley GT (1993) The pH-dependent toxicity of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn to Ceriodaphnia dubia, Pimephales promelas, Hyalella azteca, and Lumbriculus variegatus. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:1261–1266Google Scholar
  17. US Environmental Protection Agency (1992) Tiered testing issues for freshwater and marine sediments-Workshop proceedings. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. US Environmental Protection Agency (1989) Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms, EPA/600/3–85/104. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  19. US Environmental Protection Agency (1986a) Ambient water quality criteria for chlorpyrifos. EPA/440/5–86–005 NTIS, Springfield, VAGoogle Scholar
  20. US Environmental Protection Agency (1986b) Ambient water quality criteria for nickel. EPA/440/5–86–004 NTIS, Springfield, VA Google Scholar
  21. US Environmental Protection Agency (1984a) Ambient water quality criteria for copper. EPA/440/5–84–031 NTIS, Springfield, VAGoogle Scholar
  22. US Environmental Protection Agency (1984b) Ambient water quality criteria for cadmium. EPA/440/5–84–032 NTIS, Springfield, VAGoogle Scholar
  23. US Environmental Protection Agency (1984c) Ambient water quality criteria for lead, EPA/440/5–84–027 NTIS, Springfield, VAGoogle Scholar
  24. US Environmental Protection Agency (1984d) AQUIRE: Aquatic information retrieval toxicity data base. EPA/600/8–84–021 NTIS, Springfield, VAGoogle Scholar
  25. US Environmental Protection Agency (1980a) Ambient water quality criteria for zinc, EPA/440/5–80–079 NTIS, Springfield, VAGoogle Scholar
  26. US Environmental Protection Agency (1980b) Ambient water quality criteria for DDT, EPA/440/5–80–038 NTIS, Springfield, VAGoogle Scholar
  27. US Environmental Protection Agency (1980c) Ambient water quality criteria for aldrin/dieldrin. EPA/440/5–80–019 NTIS, Springfield, VAGoogle Scholar
  28. West CW, Mattson VR, Leonard EN, Phipps GL, Ankley GT (1993) Comparison of the relative sensitivity of three benthic invertebrates to copper contaminated sediments from the Keweenaw Waterway. Hydrobiologia 262:57–63Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. L. Phipps
    • 1
  • V. R. Mattson
    • 1
  • G. T. Ankley
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyDuluthUSA

Personalised recommendations