Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 271–277 | Cite as

Chrysophycean cysts (stomatocysts) from Lake Baikal and Irkutsk Reservoir, Siberia

  • S. S. Vorobyova
  • G. V. Pomazkina
  • E. Yu. Baranova
  • Ye. V. Likhoshway
  • Craig D. Sandgren
Note

Abstract

Chrysophycean cysts (stomatocysts, statospores) from Lake Baikal and Irkutsk Reservoir, Siberia, Russia have been investigated by means of scanning electron microscopy for the first time. The paper contains descriptions and illustrations of 7 particularly distinctive forms. Five of the cyst types described here are new to the literature. Two are very similar to cysts previously described from lake sediments in North America, but differ in details of surface ornamentation and cyst collar construction.

Key words

Siberia Lake Baikal Russia Chrysophyceae stomatocyst statospore resting cyst 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, R. A., 1987. Synurophyceae classic nov., a new class of algae. Amer. J. Bot. 74: 337–353.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, R. A., 1989. The Synurophyceae and their relationships to other golden algae. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 95: 1–26.Google Scholar
  3. Antipova, N. L., 1980. Sezonnyje i godovyje izmeneniya fitoplanktona v ozere Baikal. (Seasonal and interannual changes of phytoplankton in Lake Baikal). Abstract, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Irkutsk, Irkutsk, Russia, 34 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury, J. P., Bezrukova, Y. V., Chernyaeva, G. P., Colman, S. M., Khursevich, G., King, J. W. & Y. V. Likhoshway, 1994. A synthesis of post-glacial diatom records from Lake Baikal. J. Paleolimnol. 10: 213–252.Google Scholar
  5. Cronberg, G., 1986. Chrysophycean cysts and scales in lake sediments: a review. In J. Kristiansen & R. A. Andersen (eds.), Chrysophytes: Aspects and Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 281–315.Google Scholar
  6. Cronberg, G., 1988. Variability in size and ultrastructure of the statospore of Mallomonas caudata. Hydrobiologia 161: 31–39.Google Scholar
  7. Duff, K. E., B. A. Zeeb & J. P. Smol. 1995. Atlas of Chrysophycean Cysts. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 189 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Galazii, G., 1991. Lake Baikal repriveved. Endeavour 15: 13–15.Google Scholar
  9. Gosudarstvennoye Izdatelstvo Geologicheskoj Literatury, 1949. Diatomovy analiz. Obshchaya I paleobotanicheskaya khararteristica diatomovich vodorosley. (Diatom analysis. General and paleobotanic characteristics of diatom algae). Leningrad, 237 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Hibberd, D. J., 1976. The ultrastructure and taxonomy of the Chrysophyceae and Prymnesiophyceae (Haptophyceae): a survey with some new observations on the ultrastructure of the Chrysophyceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 72: 55–80.Google Scholar
  11. Izmestyeva, L. P. & O. M. Kozhova, 1988. Dolgosrochnoye prognozirovaniye sostoyaniya ecosistem. (Longterm prognosis of the state of ecosystems). Novosibirsk Nauka, 1988: 97–129.Google Scholar
  12. Kobanova, G. I. & N. I. Obukhova, 1984. Sovremennoye sosotoyaniye fitoplanktona predplotinnoj chasti Irkutskogo vodokhranilishcha. (The present state of phytoplankton of the pre-bar region of the Irkutsk Reservoir). Botanicheskij Zhurna 70(6): 791–799.Google Scholar
  13. Kozhov, M. M., 1962. Biologiya ozera Baikal. (Biology of Lake Baikal). Izdatelstvo AN SSSR, Moskow, 1962: 109–110.Google Scholar
  14. Kozhov, M., 1959. Lake Baikal and Its Life. W. Junk, The Hague, Netherlands, 200 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Kozhova, O. M., 1959. Sistematichesky spisok planktonnyh vedorosley ozera Baikal i nekotoriye dannie biologii massovyh form. (A systematic list of planktonic algae of Lake Baikal and some data on the biology of mass forms). Izv. Sib Otd. Acad. Naek SSSR, 1959(10): 112–124.Google Scholar
  16. Kozhova, O. M., 1987. Phytoplankton of Lake Baikal: Structural and functional characteristics. Ergeb. Limnol. 25: 19–37.Google Scholar
  17. Kozhova, O. M. & G. F. Zagorenko, 1982. Izucheniye fitoplanktona Baikala kak zadach monitoringa. (Studies of the composition of the phytoplankton of Lake Baikal: a problem of monitoring). In Monitoring bakterialnogo i rastitelnogo nascleniya vodoyomov, Tes. docl na vsesoyuzn. Abstracts, All-Union Conference (‘Problems of Ecology of Pribaikalye’), Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Issue 2: 73–74.Google Scholar
  18. Kristiansen, J., 1990. Phylum Chrysophyta. In L. Margulis, J. O. Corliss, M. Melkonian & D. J. Chapman (eds.), Handbook of Protoctista. Jones & Bartlett Publ., Boston, Massachusetts: 438–453.Google Scholar
  19. Nygaard, G., 1956. The ancient and recent flora of Diatoms and Chrysophyceae in Lake Gribsø. In K. Berg & I. B. Clemens Petersen (eds.), Studies on the Humic, Acid Lake Gribsø. Folia limnol. Scand. 8: 32–93.Google Scholar
  20. Preisig, H. R., 1995. A modern concept of chrysophyte classification. In C. D. Sandgren, J. P. Smol & J. Kristiansen (eds.) Chrysophyte Algae: Ecology, Phylogeny and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 46–74.Google Scholar
  21. Sandgren, C. D., 1983. Morphological variability in populations of chrysophycean resting cysts. I. Genetic (interclonal) and encystment temperature effects on morphology. J. Phycol. 19: 64–70.Google Scholar
  22. Sandgren, C. D., 1988. The ecology of chrysophyte flagellates: their growth and perennation strategies as freshwater phytoplankton. In C. D. Sandgren (ed.), Growth and Reproductive Strategies of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 9–104.Google Scholar
  23. Sandgren, C. D., 1989. SEM observations on siliceous resting cyst (stomatocyst) development in diverse members of the Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae asensu Andersen. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 95: 45–69.Google Scholar
  24. Sandgren, C. D., 1991. Chrysophyte reproduction and resting cysts: a paleolimnologist's primer. J. Paleolimnol. 5: 1–9.Google Scholar
  25. Sandgren, C. D. & H. J. Carney, 1983. A flora of fossil chrysophycean cysts from the recent sediments of Frains Lake, Michigas, U.S.A. Nova Hedwigia 38: 129–163.Google Scholar
  26. Sandgren, C. D., Idhe, T. F. & Likhoshway, Ye. V. Morphological descriptions and stratigraphic distributions of chrysophyte cysts (stomatocysts) in the recent sediments of Lake Baikal, Siberia, J. Paleolimnol. (Submitted).Google Scholar
  27. Sandgren, C. D. & W. E. Walton, 1995. Zooplankton herbivory and chrysophyte biogeography. In C. D. Sandgren, J. P. Smol & J. Kristiansen (eds.), Chrysophyte Algae: Ecology, Phylogeny and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 269–302.Google Scholar
  28. Siver, P. A., 1991. The Biology of Mallomonas: Morphology, Taxonomy and Ecology. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 230 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Siver, P. A., 1995. The distribution of chrysophytes along environmental gradients: their use as biological indicators. In C. D. Sandgren, J. P. Smol & J. Kristiansen (eds.), Chrysophyte Algae: Ecology, Phylogeny and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 232–268.Google Scholar
  30. Smol, J. P., 1995. Applications of chrysophytes to problems in paleoecology. In C. D. Sandgren, J. P. Smol & J. Kristiansen (eds.), Chrysophyte Algae: Ecology, Phylogeny and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 303–329.Google Scholar
  31. Stewari, J. M., 1990. The great lake is in great peril (Lake Baikal). New. Sci. 126: 58–62.Google Scholar
  32. Votintsey, K. K., A. I. Meshcheryakov & G. I. Popovskaya, 1985. Krngovorot organicheskogo v Zabelina eshchestva v ozere Baikal (Turnover of organic compounds in Lake Baikal). Novosibirsk, Nauka, 190 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Zabelina, M. M., I. A. Kisselev, A. I. Proshkina-Lavrenko & V. S. Sheshukova, 1951. Opredelitel presnovodnyh vodoroslej SSSR. (Key to freshwater algae of the USSR). Sovetskaya Nauka, Issue 4, Moskow, 592 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. S. Vorobyova
    • 1
  • G. V. Pomazkina
    • 1
  • E. Yu. Baranova
    • 1
  • Ye. V. Likhoshway
    • 1
  • Craig D. Sandgren
    • 2
  1. 1.Limnological InstituteSiberian Division of the Russian Academy of SciencesIrkutskRussia
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations