Mercury exposure in high school chemistry teachers

  • C. Crump
  • C. F. Bearer
  • D. C. Paschal
  • D. Rodenbaugh
  • R. A. Etzel
Article

Abstract

To assess whether high school chemistry teachers had higher urinary mercury concentrations than other high school teachers, 24 high school teachers from nine schools in northeastern Ohio were studied. First morning voided urine samples and air samples from the teachers' classrooms were analyzed for total mercury content by cold vapor atomic absorption. The median adjusted urinary mercury concentration in the 12 chemistry teachers was 4.6 μg/g creatinine (range 2.2–8.2 μg/g creatinine) and it was 6.3 μg/g creatinine in the 12 non-chemistry teachers. All classroom air samples contained mercury levels below detection limits. No evidence was provided that high school chemistry teachers are at increased risk of chronic mercury exposure from their teaching activities compared to other high school teachers.

Keywords

Mercury Creatinine High School Teaching Activity Total Mercury 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agocs MM, Etzel RA, Parrish RG, Paschal DC, Campagna PR, Cohen DS, Kilbourne EM, Hesse JL (1990) Mercury exposure from interior latex paint. N Eng J Med 323:1096–1101Google Scholar
  2. Beusterien KM, Etzel RA, Agocs MM, Egeland GM, Socie EM, Rouse MA, Mortensen BK (1991) Indoor air mercury concentrations following application of interior latex paint. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 21:62–64Google Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control (1988) Mercury exposure in a high school laboratory—Connecticut. MMWR 37:10Google Scholar
  4. Clarkson TW (1990) Mercury—an element of mystery (editorial) N Engl J Med 323:1137–1139Google Scholar
  5. — (1988) Mercury; The prediction of intake of mercury vapor from amalgams. In: Clarkson TW, Friberg L, Nordberg GF, Sager PR, (eds) Biological monitoring of toxic metals. Plenum, NY, 199–264Google Scholar
  6. Fitzgerald FW (1979) Distribution of mercury in natural waters. In: Nriagu JO, ed. The Biogeochemistry of mercury in the environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 161–174Google Scholar
  7. Goyer RA (1986) Toxic effects of metals. In: Doull J, Klaassen CD, Amdur MO (eds) Casarett and Doull's toxicology: the basic science of poisons. 3rd ed. Macmillan, NY, pp 605–609Google Scholar
  8. Lindqvist O, Jernelov A, Johansson K, Rodhe H (1984) Mercury in the Swedish environment, global and local sources. National Environmental Protection Board, Sweden, Report No. 1816Google Scholar
  9. Nilsson B, Gerhardsson L, Nordberg GF (1990) Urine mercury levels and associated symptoms in dental personnel. Sci Total Environ 94:179–185Google Scholar
  10. Sexton DJ, Powell KE, Liddle J, Smrek A, Smith JC, Clarkson TW (1978) A nonoccupational outbreak of inorganic mercury vapor poisoning. Arch Environ Health July/Aug:186–191Google Scholar
  11. Svare CW, Peterson LC, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Frank CW, Gay DD, Cox RD (1981) The effect of dental amalgams on mercury levels in expired air. J Dent Res 60:1668–1671Google Scholar
  12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1984) Mercury health effects update. Environmental Protection Agency Report No. EPA-600/8-84-019FGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Crump
    • 1
  • C. F. Bearer
    • 2
  • D. C. Paschal
    • 1
  • D. Rodenbaugh
    • 2
  • R. A. Etzel
    • 1
  1. 1.National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Office of Neonatology, Department of PediatricsRainbow Babies and Childrens HospitalClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations