Toxicity of weathered coal tar for shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) embryos and larvae

  • R. M. Kocan
  • M. B. Matta
  • S. M. Salazar
Article

Abstract

Weathered coal tar collected from the Connecticut River near Holyoke, Massachusetts, was toxic to shortnose sturgeon embryos and larvae in whole sediment flow-through and elutriate static-renewal laboratory exposures. Sterile laboratory sand and clean Connecticut River sand, collected upstream from the coal tar deposits, produced no significant difference in toxicity to sturgeon embryos-larvae, while coal tar-contaminated sediment produced over 95% embryo-larval mortality. Hydrocarbon transfer and subsequent toxicity appeared to be via direct contact of the embryos with contaminated sediment, rather than via exposure to soluble hydrocarbons. This conclusion was supported by exposure of embryos and larvae to elutriates (e.g., water soluble extract) of coal-tar sediments, that resulted in embryo and larval mortality at low molecular weight PAH concentrations ≥0.47 mg/L, higher than would occur naturally. No decrease in petroleum hydrocarbon concentration was observed in sediments exposed to flowing water for 14 d, supporting the contention that soluble hydrocarbons were not responsible for the observed toxicity in whole sediment exposures under the conditions employed in this study.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conte FS, Doroshov SI, Lutes PB, Strange EM (1988) Hatchery manual for the white sturgeon, Acinpenser transmontanus, with application to other North American Acinpenseridae. Div. of Agriculture and Natural Resources, publ. 3322. Coop. Extension University of California, Davis, CA, p 104Google Scholar
  2. Hanson DL, Cochnauer TG, DeVore JD, Forner HE, Kisanuki TT, Kohlhorst DW, Lumley P, McCabe Jr G, Nigro AA, Parker S, Swartz D and Van Vooren A (1992) White sturgeon management framework plan. Pacific States Marine FIsheries Commission, 2501 SW First Ave, Suite 200, Portland OR, p 201Google Scholar
  3. Hannah JB, Hose JE, Landolt ML, Miller BS, Felton SP and Iwaoka WT (1982) Benzo(a)pyrene-induced morphologic and developmental abnormalities in rainbow trout. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 11:727–734Google Scholar
  4. Harkey GA, Van Hoof PL, Landrum PF (1995) Bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from a historically contaminated sediment core. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:1551–1560Google Scholar
  5. Hose JE, Hannah JB, Puffer HW, Landolt ML (1984) Histologic and skeletal abnormalities in benzo(a)pyrene-treated rainbow trout alevins. Archives Environ Contam Toxicol 13:675–684Google Scholar
  6. Johnson L, Casillas E, Misitano D, Collier T, Stein JE, McCain B, Varanasi U (1989) Bioindicators of reproductive impairment in female English sole (Parophrys vetulus) exposed to environmental contaminants. In: Proceedings, Oceans '89 Symposium, Seattle, WA, pp 391–395Google Scholar
  7. Kocan RM, Landolt ML (1984) Alterations in patterns of excretion and other metabolic functions in developing fish embryos exposed to benzo(a)pyrene. Helgolander Meeresunters 37:493–504Google Scholar
  8. Laale HW (1981) Teratology and early fish development. Amer Zool 21:517–533Google Scholar
  9. Landolt ML, Kocan RM (1984) Lethal and sublethal affects of marine sediment extracts on fish cells and chromosomes. Helgolander Meeresun 37:479–491Google Scholar
  10. Long ER and LG Morgan (1991) The potential for biological effects of sediment-sorbed contaminants tested in the National Status and Trends Program. NOAA Tech Memo NOA OMA 52Google Scholar
  11. McCain BB, Hodgins HO, Gronlund WD, Hawkes JW, Brown DW, Myers MS, Vandermeulen JH (1978) Bioavailability of crude oil from experimentally oiled sediment to English sole (Parophrys vetulus), and pathological consequences. J Fish Res Board Can 35:657Google Scholar
  12. McElroy AE, Farrington JW and Teal JM (1989) Bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the aquatic environment. In: Varanasi U, (ed) Metabolism of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the aquatic environment. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, FL p 12–33Google Scholar
  13. Moles A, Babcock MM, Rice SD (1987) Effects of oil exposure on pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha, alevins in a simulated intertidal environment. Marine Environ Res 21:49–58Google Scholar
  14. Neff JM (1985) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In: GM Rand, SR Petrocelli (eds) Fundamentals of aquatic toxiciology. Hemisphere Pub. Corp., NY pp 416–454Google Scholar
  15. NUSCO (Northeast Utilities Service Company) field Report (1992) Bottom Survey of the Connecticut River at Holyoke, Mass. Dec. 30, 1992. Report to the Mass. Dept. of Environ Protection and NOAA by NUSCO, Hartford, CTGoogle Scholar
  16. Slooff W (1982) Skeletal anomalies in fish from polluted surface waters. Aquatic Toxicol 2:157–173Google Scholar
  17. Tilghman Hall A, Oris JT (1991) Anthrocene reduces reproductive potential and is maternally transferred during long-term exposure in fathead minnows. Aquatic Toxicol 19:249–264Google Scholar
  18. U.S. EPA (1986) Test protocols for solid waste: Col. 1B. Laboratory manual physical/chemical methods. SW 846. U.S. Environ Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington DC, vols. 1–3Google Scholar
  19. — (1993) Quality Criteria for Water: Prepared for Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Office of Water, U.S. Environ Protection Agency, Washington DC, p. 294Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Kocan
    • 1
  • M. B. Matta
    • 2
  • S. M. Salazar
    • 3
  1. 1.School of FisheriesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.NOAA/Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment DivisionSeattleUSA
  3. 3.EVS ConsultantsSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations