Climate Dynamics

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 381–388

A global ocean mesh to overcome the North Pole singularity

  • Gurvan Madec
  • Maurice Imbard
Article

Abstract

A semi-analytical method is presented for constructing a global orthogonal curvilinear ocean mesh which has no singularity point inside the computational domain since the mesh poles are moved to land points. The method involves defining an analytical set of mesh parallels in the stereographic polar plan, computing the associated set of mesh meridians, and projecting the resulting mesh onto the sphere. The set of mesh parallels proposed here is defined as a series of embedded circles. The resulting mesh presents no loss of continuity in either the mesh lines or the scale factors over the whole ocean domain, as the mesh is not a composite mesh. Thus, the Bering Strait can be opened without specific treatment. The equator is a mesh line, which provides a better numerical solution for equatorial dynamics. The resolution can be easily controlled through the definition of three analytical functions which can increase resolution and/or maintain a low ratio of anisotropy. The mesh has been implemented in the LODYC general circulation ocean model. Results of a semi-diagnostic simulation are shown.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aagaard K, Carmark EC (1989) The role of sea ice and other fresh water in the Arctic circulation. J Geophys Res 94:14485–14498Google Scholar
  2. Blanke B, Delecluse P (1992) Variability of the tropical Atlantic ocean simulated by a general circulation model with two different mixed layer physics. J Phys Oceanogr 23:1363–1388Google Scholar
  3. Bryan F (1987) Parameter sensitivity of primitive equation ocean general circulation models. J Phys Oceanogr 17:970–985Google Scholar
  4. Bryan K, Manabe S, Pacanowski RC (1975) A global ocean atmosphere climate model. Part 11. The oceanic circulation. J Phys Oceanogr 5:30–46Google Scholar
  5. Coachman LK, Aagaard K (1988) Transports through Bering Strait: annual and interannual variability. J Geophys Res 93:15535–15539Google Scholar
  6. Coward AC, Killworth PD, Blundell JR (1994) Tests of a two-grid world ocean model. J Geophys Res 99:22725–22735Google Scholar
  7. Delecluse P, Madec G, Imbard M, Lévy C (1993) OPA version 7 Ocean General Circulation Model reference manual. LODYC, France, Internal Report, 93/05, 111 pp (Available from Laboratoire d'Océanographie Dynamique et de Climatologie, Université Paris VI, 75252 Paris, France)Google Scholar
  8. Deleersnijder E, Van Ypersele JP, Campin JM (1993) An orthogonal, curvilinear coordinate system for a world ocean model. Ocean Modelling 100 (unpublished manuscript)Google Scholar
  9. Eby M, Holloway G (1994) Grid transformation for incorporating the Arctic in a global ocean model. Clim Dyn 10:241–247Google Scholar
  10. Esbensen SK, Kushnir Y (1981) The heat budget of the global ocean: an atlas based on estimates from marine surface observations. Climatic Resolution Institution, Oregon State, University, Rep 29Google Scholar
  11. ETOPO5 (1986) Global 5′ × 5′ depth and elevation. (Available from National Geographical Data Center, NOAA, US Department of Commerce, Code E/GC3, Boulder, CO 80303)Google Scholar
  12. Guilyardi E, Madec G, Terray L, Déqué M, Pontaud M, Imbard M, Stephenson D, Filiberti MA, Cariolle D, Delecluse P, Thual O (1995) Simulation couplée ocean-atmosphere de la variability du climat. C R Acad Sci Paris, 320, Série Ila, 683–690Google Scholar
  13. Gwilliam CS (1995) The OCCAM Global Ocean Model. In: Hoffman G-R, Krietz N (eds) Coming of Age (Proc 6th ECMWF Workshop on the use of parallel processors in meteorology), World ScientificGoogle Scholar
  14. Hellerman S, Rosenstein M (1983) Normal monthly wind stress over the World Ocean with error estimates. J Phys Oceanogr 13:1093–1104Google Scholar
  15. Herman GF; Johnson WT (1980) The effect of extreme sea ice variations on the Climatology of the Goddard general circulation model. In: Pritchard ED (ed) Sea ice processes and models. University of Washington, Seattle, pp 207–223Google Scholar
  16. Levitus S (1982) Climatological atlas of the Word Ocean. NOAA Prof Pap 13, CS Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  17. Marti O, Madec G, Delecluse P (1992) Comment on “net diffusivity in ocean general circulation models with nonuniform grids” by F. L. Yin and I. Y. Fung. J Geophys Res 97:12763–12766Google Scholar
  18. Murray RJ (1995) Explicit generation of orthogonal grids for ocean models. J Comput Phys (accepted)Google Scholar
  19. Mysak LA, Manak DK, Marsden RF (1990) Sea-ice anomalies observed in the Greenland and Labrador Seas during 1901–1984 and their relation to an interdecadal Arctic climate cycle. Clim Dyn 5:111–133Google Scholar
  20. Reason CJC, Power SB (1994) The influence of the Bering Strait on the circulation in a coarse resolution global ocean model. Clim Dyn 9:363–369Google Scholar
  21. Rudels B (1989) The formation of polar surface water, the ice export and the exchanges through Fram Strait. Prog Oceanogr 22:205–248Google Scholar
  22. Semtner AJ, Chervin RM (1988) A simulation of the global ocean circulation with resolved eddies. J Geophys Res 93:15502–15522Google Scholar
  23. Semtner AJ, Chervin RM (1992) Ocean general circulation from a global eddy-resolving model. J Geophys Res 97:5493–5550Google Scholar
  24. Washington WM, Meehl GA (1986) General circulation model CO2 sensitivity experiments: snow-sea ice albedo parameterization and globally averaged surface air temperature. Clim Change 8:231–241Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gurvan Madec
    • 1
  • Maurice Imbard
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d'Océanographie Dynamique et de Climatologie (CNRS/ORSTOM/UPMC)Université Paris VIParisFrance

Personalised recommendations