Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 339–349

Study of vortex breakdown by particle tracking velocimetry (PTV)

Part 1: Bubble-type vortex breakdown
  • C. Brücker
  • W. Althaus
Originals

Abstract

Using a quasi three-dimensional instantaneous measurement technique, which combines particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) with volume scanning, first quantitative experimental results of the unsteady and asymmetric interior region of vortex breakdown were obtained. The study was carried out in a low speed flow through a cylindrical tube. A vortex was generated by a set of guidevanes and subjected to an adverse pressure gradient causing its breakdown. By scanning a pulsed illuminated planar laser light sheet, a set of meridional and azimuthal “cuts” of the flow was obtained. With PTV the recorded particle paths in the “cuts” were processed in order to obtain the instantaneous two-dimensional velocity field, mean streamlines and vorticity distribution. Moreover, the three-dimensional shape of the appearing breakdown, visualized with fluorescent dye, was reconstructed from the “cuts”. The results revealed that the shape of the bubble nearly equals the streamsurface of the stagnation point. According to the conditions in the water tunnel a single tilted vortex ring at the open rear part of the bubble dominates the interior flow structure of the bubble as first noted by Sarpkaya (1971). The vortical flow is bulged over the bubble, restored and intensified at the lower end. The gathered data lead to the conclusion that the vortex axis remains parallel to the centerline.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agüi, J. C.; Jiménez, J. 1987: On the performance of particle tracking. J. Fluid Mech. 185, 447–468Google Scholar
  2. Breuer, M. 1991: Numerische Lösung der Navier-Stokes-Gleichungen für dreidimensionale inkompressible instationäre Strömungen zur Simulation des Wirbelaufplatzens. Ph. D. thesis RWTH AachenGoogle Scholar
  3. Escudier, M. P.; Zehnder, N. 1982: Vortex-flow regimes. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 105–121Google Scholar
  4. Faler, J. H.; Leibovich, S. 1977: Disrupted states of vortex flow and vortex breakdown. Phys. Fluid 20, 1385–1400Google Scholar
  5. Faler, J. H.; Leibovich, S. 1978: An experimental map of the internal structure of vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 313–335Google Scholar
  6. Gharib, M.; Willert, C. 1988: Particle tracing: Revisited. AIAA/ASME/SIAM/APS 1st Natl. Fluid Dyn. Congr. The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Vol. 3., 1935—1943, Cincinnati, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Gray, C.; Greated, C. A. 1988: A scanning laser beam system for two dimensional illumination of flow fields. In: Particle Image Displacement Velocimetry. VKI Lect. Ser. 1988-06, March 21.–25. 1988, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  8. Imaichi, K.; Ohmi, K. 1983: Numerical processing of flow visualization pictures measurement of two-dimensional vortex flow. J. Fluid Mech. 129, 283–311Google Scholar
  9. Krause, E. 1990a: Vortex breakdown: Physical issue and computational simulation. 3. Int. Cong. Fluid Mech., Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  10. Krause, E. 1990b: The solution to the problem of vortex breakdown. In: Lecture Notes in Physics 371, 35–50, Berlin Heidelberg New York SpringerGoogle Scholar
  11. Leibovich, S. 1978: The structure of vortex breakdown. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 10, 221–246Google Scholar
  12. Michalke, A. 1972: The instability of free shear layers. Progr. Aerosp. Sci. 12, 213–239Google Scholar
  13. Nosenchuck, D. M.; Lynch, M. K. 1986: Three-dimensional flow visualization using laser-sheet scanning. AGARD Conf. Proc. 413, 18–1–18–13Google Scholar
  14. Peckham, D. H.; Atkinson, S. A. 1957: Preliminary results of low speed wind tunnel tests on a Ghotic wing of aspect ratio 1.0. Aeronaut. Res. Counc. CP. 508Google Scholar
  15. Rignot, E.; Spedding, G. R. 1987: Performance analysis of automated image processing and grid interpolation techniques for fluid flows. USC Aerosp. Eng. Intern. Rep. USCAE 143, March 1988Google Scholar
  16. Sarpkaya, T. 1971: On stationary and traveling vortex breakdowns. J. Fluid Mech. 45, 545–559Google Scholar
  17. Spall, R. E.; Gatski, T. B.; Ash, R. L. 1990: The structure and dynamis of bubble-type vortex breakdown. Proc. R. Soc. London A 429, 613–637Google Scholar
  18. Uchida, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Oshawa, M. 1985: Experiments on the axisymmetric vortex breakdown in a swirling air flow. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aero. Sci. 27, 206–216Google Scholar
  19. Yoda, M.; Hesselink, L. 1990: A three-dimensional visualization technique applied to flow around a delta wing. Exp. Fluids 10, 102–108Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Brücker
    • 1
  • W. Althaus
    • 1
  1. 1.Aerodynamisches InstitutRWTH AachenAachenFRG

Personalised recommendations