Lethal effects of the consumption of field levels of paraquat-contaminated plants on frog tadpoles

  • C. A. Bauer Dial
  • N. A. Dial


Waste Water Water Management Water Pollution Lethal Effect Field Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Calderbank A, McKenna RH, Stevens MA, Walley JK (1968) Grazing trials on paraquat-treated pasture. J Sci Fd Agric 19:246–250Google Scholar
  2. Calderbank A (1972) Environmental considerations in the development of diquat and paraquat as aquatic herbicides. Outlook Agr 7:51–54Google Scholar
  3. Dial NA, Bauer CA (1984) Teratogenic and lethal effects of paraquat on developing frog embryos. Bull Environ Contain Toxicol 33:592–597Google Scholar
  4. Dial NA, Dial CA (1986) Lethal effects of diquat and paraquat on developing frog embryos and 15-day old tadpoles (Rana pipiens). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 38:1006–1011Google Scholar
  5. Ernest RD (1971) The effect of paraquat on fish in a Colorado farm pond. Progressive Fish Culturist 33:27–31Google Scholar
  6. Funderburk HH, Lawrence JM (1964) Mode of action and metabolism of diquat and paraquat. Weeds 12:259–264Google Scholar
  7. Funderburk HH, Bozarth GA (1967) Review of the metabolism and decomposition of diquat and paraquat. J Agr Food Chem 15:563–567Google Scholar
  8. Gill R., Qua SC, Moffat AC (1983) High-performace liquid chromatography of paraquat and diquat in vrine with rapid sample preparation involving ion-pair extraction on disposable cartridges of octadecyl-silica. Chrom 15:483–490Google Scholar
  9. Newman JF (1970) Ecological implications of the use of paraquat and diquat as aquatic herbicides. Chem Ind (London) 45:1424–1425Google Scholar
  10. Rugh R (1962) Experimental embryology. Burgess, Mineapolis, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  11. Slade P (1966) The fate of paraquat applied to plants. Weed Res 6:158–167Google Scholar
  12. Way JM, Newman JF, Moore NW, Knaggs FW (1971) Some ecological effects of the use of paraquat for the control of weeds in small lakes. J Appl Ecol 8:509–532Google Scholar
  13. Worobey (1987) Analytical Method for the Simultaneous Determination of diquat and paraquat residues in potatoes by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Pestic Sci 18:245–257Google Scholar
  14. Yeo RR (1967) Dissipation of diquat and paraquat, and effects on aquatic weeds and fish. Weeds 15:42–46Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. A. Bauer Dial
    • 1
  • N. A. Dial
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Life SciencesIndiana State UniversityTerre HauteUSA

Personalised recommendations