Advertisement

Cell and Tissue Research

, Volume 162, Issue 2, pp 235–252 | Cite as

Freeze-fracture replication of junctional complexes in unincubated and incubated chick embryos

  • R. Bellairs
  • A. S. Breathnach
  • M. Gross
Article

Summary

Junctional complexes have been investigated in the epiblast of young chick embryos by examination of freeze-fracture replicas and of sections of comparable specimens stained with lanthanum nitrate. By means of freeze-fracture, tight junctions were shown to be present in the unincubated embryo (stage 1 of Hamburger and Hamilton). The number of ridges or grooves was found to vary between 2 and 10 near the dorsal border, whereas isolated ridges were found more ventrally. Lanthanum was unable to penetrate between the cells in the region of the dorsally situated tight junctions. Similar tight junctions were found in incubated embryos (stage 3) examined by both techniques. Tight junctions were also seen in cleavage (pre-laying) embryos examined in section.

Gap junctions were extremely uncommon in unincubated embryos, though occasional aggregates of gap junction particles were seen on the lateral cell membranes close to the dorsal surface. In only one instance were associated pits visible. By contrast, gap junctions were more frequently encountered by stage 3, and these junctions possessed both pits and particles. Desmosomes were never seen in the freeze-fracture replicas at either stages 1 or 3, though structures which might be developing desmosomes were visible in sections.

The functions of both the tight and gap junctions in the young chick embryo are discussed. The results are also considered in relation to recent theories about the way in which gap junctions are formed.

Key words

Junctions (gap, tight) Chick embryo Freeze-fracture Lanthanum Unincubated, incubated 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bancroft, M., Bellairs, R.: The onset of differentiation in the epiblast of the chick blastoderm (SEM and TEM). Cell Tiss. Res. 155, 399–418 (1974)Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, M. V. L., Spira, M. E., Pappas, G. D.: Properties of electrotonic junctions between embryonic cells of Fundulus. Develop. Biol. 29, 419–435 (1972)Google Scholar
  3. Branton, D.: Freeze-etching studies of membrane structures. Phil. Trans. B 261, 133–138 (1971)Google Scholar
  4. Breathnach, A. S., Stolinski, C., Gross, M.: Ultrastructure of fetal and post-natal human skin as revealed by the freeze-fracture replication technique. Micron 3, 287–304 (1972)Google Scholar
  5. Claude, P., Goodenough, D. A.: Fracture faces of zonulae occludentesfrom “tight” and “leaky” epithelia. J. Cell. Biol. 58, 390–400 (1973)Google Scholar
  6. Cox, R. P., Krauss, M. R., Balis, M. E., Dancis, J.: Metabolic co-operation in cell culture: A model for cell-to-cell communication. In: Cell Communication (Rody P. Cox, ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons. 1974Google Scholar
  7. Decker, R. S., Friend, D. S.: Assembly of gap junctions during amphibian neurulation. J. Cell. Biol. 62, 32–47 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dougherty, R. M., Di Stefano, H. S.: Lack of relationship between infection with Avian Leukosis Virus and the presence of COFAL antigen in chick embryos. Virology 29, 586–595 (1966)Google Scholar
  9. Emanuelsson, H.: Ultrastructure of nuclei, yolk granules and mitochondria in the early chick blastoderm. Archiv für Zoologie 20, 413–531 (1968)Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, B. M.: Body temperature and thermoregulation. In: Physiology of the domestic fowl, (D. J. Bell and B. M. Freeman, eds.). New York: Academic Press 1971Google Scholar
  11. Friend, D. S., Gilula, N. B.: Variations in tight and gap junctions in mammalian tissues. J. Cell Biol. 53, 758–776 (1972)Google Scholar
  12. Gilula, N. B.: Junctions between cells. In: Cell Communication (Rody P. Cox, ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons 1974Google Scholar
  13. Hamburger, V., Hamilton, H. L.: A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morph. 88, 49–92 (1951)Google Scholar
  14. Hastings, R. A., Enders, A. C.: Junctional complexes in the preimplantation rabbit embryo. Anat. Rec. 181, 17–34 (1975)Google Scholar
  15. House, C. R.: “Water transport in cells and tissues”. London: Edward Arnold 1974Google Scholar
  16. Karnovsky, M. J.: A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 27, 137A (1965)Google Scholar
  17. Lentz, T. L., Trinkaus, J. P.: Differentiation of the Junctional complex of surface cells in the developing Fundulus blastoderm. J. Cell Biol. 48, 455–472 (1971)Google Scholar
  18. McNutt, N. S., Weinstein, R. S.: Membrane ultrastructure at mammalian intercellular junctions: In: Progress in biophysics and molecular biology (J. A. V. Butlerand D. Noble, eds.), p. 45–101. Oxford: Pergamon 1973Google Scholar
  19. New, D. A. T.: The formation of sub-blastodermic fluid in hens' eggs. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 4, 221–227 (1956)Google Scholar
  20. Overton, J.: Desmosome development in normal and reassociating cells in the early chick blastoderm. Develop. Biol. 4, 532–548 (1962)Google Scholar
  21. Pannett, C. A., Compton, A.: The cultivation of tissues in saline embryonic juices. Lancet 381–384, 1924Google Scholar
  22. Revel, J. P., Yee, A. G., Hudspeth, A. J.: Gap junctions between electrotonically coupled cells in tissue culture and in brown fat. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 68, 2924–2927 (1971)Google Scholar
  23. Revel, J. P., Yip, P., Chang, L. L.: Cell junctions in the early chick embryo—a freeze etch study. Develop. Biol. 35, 302–317 (1973)Google Scholar
  24. Romanoff, A. L., Romanoff, A. J.: The Avian Egg. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 1949Google Scholar
  25. Sanders, E. J.: Intercellular contact in the unincubated chick embryo. Z. Zellforsch. 141, 459–468 (1973)Google Scholar
  26. Sheridan, J. D.: Electrophysiological evidence for low-resistance intercellular junctions in the early chick embryo. J. Cell Biol. 37, 650–659 (1968)Google Scholar
  27. Sheridan, J. D.: Electrical coupling of cells and cell communication. In: Cell Communication (Rody P. Cox, ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons 1974Google Scholar
  28. Slack, C., Palmer, J. F.: The permeability of intercellular junctions in the early embryo of Xenopus laevis, studied with a fluorescent tracer. Exp. Cell Res. 55, 416–419 (1969)Google Scholar
  29. Staehelin, L. A.: Further observations on the fine structure of freeze-cleaved tight junctions. J. Cell Sci. 13, 763–786 (1973)Google Scholar
  30. Staehelin, L. A.: Structure and function of intercellular junctions. Int. Rev. Cytol. 39, 191–283 (1974)Google Scholar
  31. Stolinski, C.: Design and application of an original freeze-fracture apparatus. Proc. Roy. Mic. Soc. 8, 191–192 (1973)Google Scholar
  32. Trelstad, R. L., Hay, E. D., Revel, J.-P.: Cell contact during early morphogenesis in the chick embryo. Develop. Biol. 16, 78–106 (1967)Google Scholar
  33. Van Blerkom, J., Manes, C., Daniel, J. C.: Development of pre-implantation rabbit embryos in vivo and in vitro. I. An ultrastructural comparison. Develop. Biol 35, 262–282 (1973)Google Scholar
  34. Wade, J. B., Karnovsky, M. J.: Fracture faces of osmotically disrupted zonulae occludentes. J. Cell. Biol. 62, 344–350 (1974)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Bellairs
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. S. Breathnach
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Gross
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy and EmbryologyUniversity College LondonUK
  2. 2.Department of AnatomySt. Mary's Hospital Medical SchoolLondon

Personalised recommendations