Climate Dynamics

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 55–69 | Cite as

Time-dependent greenhouse warming computations with a coupled ocean-atmosphere model

  • Ulrich Cubasch
  • Klaus Hasselmann
  • Heinke Höck
  • Ernst Maier-Reimer
  • Uwe Mikolajewicz
  • Benjamin D Santer
  • Robert Sausen
Article

Abstract

Climate changes during the next 100 years caused by anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases have been simulated for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Scenarios A (“business as usual”) and D (“accelerated policies”) using a coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation model. In the global average, the near-surface temperature rises by 2.6 K in Scenario A and by 0.6 K in Scenario D. The global patterns of climate change for both IPCC scenarios and for a third step-function 2 x CO2 experiment were found to be very similar. The warming delay over the oceans is larger than found in simulations with atmospheric general circulation models coupled to mixed-layer models, leading to a more pronounced land-sea contrast and a weaker warming (and in some regions even an initial cooling) in the Southern Ocean. During the first forty years, the global warming and sea level rise due to the thermal expansion of the ocean are significantly slower than estimated previously from box-diffusion-upwelling models, but the major part of this delay can be attributed to the previous warming history prior to the start of present coupled ocean-atmosphere model integration (cold start).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakan S, Chlond A, Cubasch U, Feichter J, Graf H, Graßl H, Hasselmann K, Kirchner I, Latif M, Roeckner E, Sausen R, Schlese U, Schriever D, Schult I, Schumann U, Sielmann F, Welke W (1991) Climate response to smoke from the burning oil wells in Kuwait. Nature 351:367–371Google Scholar
  2. Boer GJ, Arpe K, Blackburn M, Deque M, Gates WL, Hart TL, Le Treut H, Roeckner E, Sheinin DA, Simmonds I, Smith RNB, Tokioka T, Wetherald RT, Williamson D (1991) An intercomparison of the climates simulated by 14 atmospheric general circulation models. WMO/TD-No 425, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. Cess RD, Potter GL, Blanchet JP, Boer GJ, Ghan SJ, Kiehl JT, Le Treut H, Li ZX, Liang XZ, Mitchell JFB, Morcrette J-J, Randall DA, Riches MR, Roeckner E, Schlese U, Slingo A, Taylor KE, Washington WM, Wetherald RT, Yagai I (1989) Interpretation of could climate feedback as produced by 14 atmospheric general circulation models. Science 245:513–516Google Scholar
  4. Broecker WS (1987) The biggest chill. Nat Hist Mag 97:74–82Google Scholar
  5. Gordon AL (1986) Interocean exchange of thermocline water. J Geophys Res 91:5037–5046Google Scholar
  6. Gordon AL, Piola AR (1983) Atlantic Ocean upper layer salinity budget. J Phys Oceanogr 13:1293–1300Google Scholar
  7. Hall MM, Bryden HL (1982) Direct estimates and mechanisms of ocean heat transport. Deep-Sea Res 29A:339–359Google Scholar
  8. Hansen J, Fung I, Lacis A, Rind D, Lebedeff S, Ruedy R, Russell G, Stone P (1988) Global climate changes as forecast by Goddard Institute for Space Studies three-dimensional model. J Geophys Res 93:9341–9364Google Scholar
  9. Hasselmann K (1991) Ocean circulation and climate change. Tellus 43 AB: 82–103Google Scholar
  10. Hasselmann K, Sausen R, Maier-Reimer E, Voss R (1992) On the cold start problem in transient simulations with coupled ocean-atmosphere models. MPI Report No 83, MPI für Meteorologie, Hamburg, FRGGoogle Scholar
  11. Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ (1990) Climate change. The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Houghton JT, Callander BA, Varney SK (1992) Climate changes 1992. The supplementary report to the IPCC assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Hsiung J (1985) Estimates of global oceanic meridional heat transport. J Phys Oceanogr 15:1405–1413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lautenschlager M, Herterich K (1990) Atmospheric response to ice age conditions — climatology near the Earth's surface. J Geophys Res 95:22547–22557Google Scholar
  15. Levitus S (1982) Climatological atlas of the World Ocean. NOAA Professional Paper 13, 173 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu Q, Schuurmanns CJE (1990) The correlation of tropospheric and stratospheric temperatures and its effect on the detection of climate changes. Geophys Res Lett 17:1085–1088Google Scholar
  17. Maier-Reimer E, Hasselmann K (1987) Transport and storage of CO2 in the ocean — an inorganic ocean-circulation carbon cycle model. Clim Dyn 2:63–90Google Scholar
  18. Maier-Reimer E, Mikolajewicz U (1989) Experiments with an OGCM on the cause of the Younger Dryas. In: Ayala-Castanares A, Wooster W, Yanez-Arancibia A (eds) Oceanography 1988. UNAM Press, Mexico, pp 87–100Google Scholar
  19. Maier-Reimer E, Mikolajewicz U, Hasselmann K (1992) Mean circulation of the Hamburg LSG OGCM and its sensitivity to the thermohaline surface forcing. J Phys Oceanogr (accepted)Google Scholar
  20. Manabe S, Bryan K, Spelman MJ (1990) Transient response of a global ocean-atmosphere model to a doubling of carbon dioxide. J Phys Oceanogr 20:722–749Google Scholar
  21. Manabe S, Stouffer RJ, Spelman MJ, Bryan K (1991) Transient responses of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model to gradual changes of atmospheric CO2. Part I: annual mean response. J Climate 4:785–818Google Scholar
  22. Mikolajewicz U, Maier-Reimer E (1990) Internal secular variability in an ocean general circulation model. Clim Dyn 4:145–156Google Scholar
  23. Mikolajewicz U, Santer BD, Maier-Reimer E (1990) Ocean response to greenhouse warming. Nature 345:589–593Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell JFB, Manabe S, Tokioka T, Meleshko V (1990) Equilibrium climate change. In: Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ (eds) Climate change. The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 131–172Google Scholar
  25. Roeckner E, Dümenil L, Kirk E, Lunkeit F, Ponater M, Rockel B, Sausen R, Schlese U (1989) The Hamburg version of the ECMWF model (ECHAM). In: Boer GF (ed) Research activities in atmospheric and oceanic modelling. CAS/JSC Working Group on Numerical Experimentation 13:7.1–7.4 WMO Technical Document 322, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  26. Roemmich D (1980) Estimation of meridional heat flux in the North Atlantic by inverse methods. J Phys Oceanogr 10:1972–1983Google Scholar
  27. Sausen R, Barthel K, Hasselmann K (1988) Coupled ocean-atmosphere models with flux corrections. Clim Dyn 2:154–163Google Scholar
  28. Schlesinger ME, Mitchell JFB (1987) Climate model simulations of the equilibrium climatic response to increased carbon dioxide. R Geophys 25:760–798Google Scholar
  29. Stouffer RJ, Manabe S, Bryan K (1989) Interhemispheric asymmetry in climate response to a gradual increase of atmospheric CO2. Nature 342:660–662Google Scholar
  30. Talley LD (1984) Meridional heat transport in the Pacific OceanGoogle Scholar
  31. Tibaldi S, Tosi E (1991) Low frequency variability and blocking as diagnostic tools for global climate models. In: Shukla J (ed) Proceedings of NATO Workshop on predictions of interannual climate variations. NATO/ASI Series, Trieste, 22-26/7/ 91Google Scholar
  32. Washington WM, Meehl GA (1989a) Climate sensitivity due to increased CO2: experiments with a coupled atmosphere and ocean general circulation model. Clint Dyn 4:1–38Google Scholar
  33. Washington WM, Meehl GA (1989b) Seasonal cycle experiments on the climate sensitivity due to a doubling of CO2 with an atmospheric general circulation model coupled to a simple mixed layer ocean model. J Geophys Res 89:9475–9503Google Scholar
  34. Wetherald RT, Manabe S (1988) Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 45:1397–1415Google Scholar
  35. Wigley TML, Raper SCB (1987) Thermal expansion of seawater associated with global warming. Nature 330:127–131Google Scholar
  36. Wigley TML, Santer BD (1990) Statistical comparison of spatial fields in model validation, perturbation and predictability experiments. J Geophys Res 95:851–865Google Scholar
  37. Wilson CA, Mitchell JFB (1987) A doubled CO2 climate sensitivity experiment with a global climate model including a simple ocean. J Geophys Res 92:13315–13343Google Scholar
  38. Xu J-S, Storch H, van Loon H (1990) The performance of four spectral GCMs in the Southern Hemisphere: the January and July climatology and the semiannual wave. J Climate 3:5370Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich Cubasch
    • 1
  • Klaus Hasselmann
    • 2
  • Heinke Höck
    • 2
  • Ernst Maier-Reimer
    • 2
  • Uwe Mikolajewicz
    • 2
  • Benjamin D Santer
    • 2
  • Robert Sausen
    • 3
  1. 1.DKRZHamburg 13Germany
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institut für MeteorologieHamburg 13Germany
  3. 3.Institut für Physik der AtmosphäreDLROberpfaffenhofenGermany

Personalised recommendations