Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 74, Issue 5, pp 439–447

Organization of receptive fields in networks with Hebbian learning: the connection between synaptic and phenomenological models

  • Harel Shouval
  • Leon N. Cooper
Original Papers

Abstract

In this paper we address the question of how interactions affect the formation and organization of receptive fields in a network composed of interacting neurons with Hebbian-type learning. We show how to partially decouple single cell effects from network effects, and how some phenomenological models can be seen as approximations to these learning networks. We show that the interaction affects the structure of receptive fields. We also demonstrate how the organization of different receptive fields across the cortex is influenced by the interaction term, and that the type of singularities depends on the symmetries of the receptive fields.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blasdel GG (1992) Orientation selectivity preference, and continuity in monkey striate cortex. J Neurosci 12:3139–3161.Google Scholar
  2. Bonhoeffer T, Grinvald A (1991) Iso-orientation domains in cat visual cortex are arranged in pinwheel-like patterns. Nature 353:429–431.Google Scholar
  3. Cowan JD, Friedman AE (1991) Simple spin models for the development of ocular dominance columns and iso-orientation patches. In: Advances in neural information processing systems 3. Morgan Kauffmann, San Mateo, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Erwin E, Obermayer K, Schulten K (1994) A simple network model of unsupervised learning. Technical report, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  5. Kosterlitz MJ, Thouless DJ (1973) Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systerms. J Phys C6:1181.Google Scholar
  6. Linsker R (1986) From basic network principles to neural architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:7508–7512, 8390–8394, 8779–8783.Google Scholar
  7. Liu Y (1994) Synaptic plasticity: from single cell to cortical network. PhD thesis, Brown University.Google Scholar
  8. Liu Y, Shouval H (1994) Localized principal components of natural images: an analytic solution. Network 5:317–325.Google Scholar
  9. MacKay DJ, Miller KD (1990) Analysis of Linsker's simulations of Hebbian rules to linear networks. Network 1:257–297.Google Scholar
  10. Malsburg C von der (1973) Self-organization of orientation sensitive cells in striate cortex. Kybernetik 14:85–100.Google Scholar
  11. Miller KD (1992) Development of orientation columns via competition between onanf off-center inputs. Neuroreport 3:73–76.Google Scholar
  12. Miller KD (1994) A model for the development of simple cell receptive fields and the ordered arrangement of orientation columns through activity-dependent competition between on-and off-center inputs. J Neurosci 14:409–441.Google Scholar
  13. Miller KD, MacKay DJC (1994) The role of constraints in Hebbian learning. Neural Comput 6:98–124.Google Scholar
  14. Miller KD, Keller JB, Striker MP (1989) Ocular dominance column development: analysis and simulation. Science 245:605–615.Google Scholar
  15. Nass MN, Cooper LN (1975) A theory for the development of feature detecting cells in visual cortex. Biol Cybern 19:1–18.Google Scholar
  16. Oja E (1982) A simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer. J Math Biol 15:267–273.Google Scholar
  17. Paullet JE, Ermentrout B (1994) Stable rotating waves in a two-dimensional discrete active media. SIAM J Appl Math 54(6):1720–1744.Google Scholar
  18. Rubinstein J (1994) Pattern formation in associative neural networks with weak lateral interaction. Biol Cyber 70:563–567.Google Scholar
  19. Shouval H, Liu Y (1995) Principal component neurons in a realistic visual environment. In preparation.Google Scholar
  20. Swindale N (1982) A model for the formation of orientation columns. Proc R Soc Lond 208:243.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harel Shouval
    • 1
  • Leon N. Cooper
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, The Department of Neuroscience and The Institute for Brain and Neural SystemsBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations