Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 65, Issue 6, pp 415–424

Coverage and the design of striate cortex

  • N. V. Swindale
Article

Abstract

Hubel and Wiesel (1977) suggested that ocular dominance and orientation columns in the macaque monkey striate cortex might be bands of uniform width that intersected orthogonally. They pointed out that if this were the case, there would be an equal allocation of cells of different orientation preference to each eye and to each point in visual space. However, orientation and ocular dominance columns have a more complex structural organization than is implied by this model: for example, iso-orientation domains do not intersect ocular dominance stripes at right angles and the two columnar systems have different periodicities. This raises the question as to how well the striate cortex manages to allocate equal numbers of neurons of different orientation preference to each eye and to each region of visual space, a factor referred to here as coverage. This paper defines a measure of uniformity of coverage, c′, and investigates its dependence on several different parameters of columnar organisation. Calculations were done first using a simplified one-dimensional model of orientation and ocular dominance columns and were then repeated using more realistic two-dimensional models, generated with the algorithms described in the preceding paper (Swindale 1991). Factors investigated include the relative periodicities of the two columnar systems, the size of the cortical point image, the width of orientation tuning curves, whether columns are spatially anisotropic or not, and the role of the structural relationships between columns described by Blasdel and Salama (1986). The results demonstrate that coverage is most uniform when orientation hypercolumns are about half the size of ocular dominance hypercolumns. Coverage is most uneven when the hypercolumns are the same size, unless they are related in the way described by Blasdel and Salama, in which case coverage gets only slightly worse as the size ratio (ori/od) increases above 0.5. The minimum diameter of cortical point image that ensures reasonably uniform coverage is about twice the size of an ocular dominance hypercolumn i.e. about 1.5–2.0 mm.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barlow HB, Blakemore C, Pettigrew JD (1967) The neural mechanisms of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol (Lond) 193:327–342Google Scholar
  2. Blakemore C, Fiorentini A, Maffei L (1972) A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol (Lond) 226:725–749Google Scholar
  3. Blakemore CB, Garey LJ, Vital-Durand F (1981) Orientation preferences in the monkey's visual cortex. J. Physiol (Lond) 319:78PGoogle Scholar
  4. Blasdel GG, Salama G (1986) Voltage-sensitive dyes reveal a modular organization in monkey striate cortex. Nature 321:579–585Google Scholar
  5. Cynader MS, Swindale NV, Matsubara JA (1987) Functional topography in cat area 18. J Neurosci 7:1401–1413Google Scholar
  6. Diao Y-C, Jia W-G, Swindale NV, Cynader MS (1990) Functional organization of the cortical 17/18 border region in the cat. Exp Brain Res 79:271–282Google Scholar
  7. Dow BM, Snyder AZ, Vautin RG, Bauer R (1981) Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey. Exp Brain Res 44:213–228Google Scholar
  8. Hong X, Regan D (1989) Visual field defects for unidirectional and oscillatory motion in depth. Vision Res 29:809–819Google Scholar
  9. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1968) Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 195:215–243Google Scholar
  10. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1974a) Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex. J Comp Neurol 158:267–294Google Scholar
  11. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1974b) Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: a parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor. J Comp Neurol 158:295–306Google Scholar
  12. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1977) Functional architecture of macaque monkey striate cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B 198:1–59Google Scholar
  13. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN, LeVay S (1977) Plasticity of ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 278:131–163Google Scholar
  14. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN, Stryker MP (1978) Anatomical demonstration of orientation columns in macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 177:361–380Google Scholar
  15. Jiang B, Levi DM (1991) Spatial-interval discrimination in two-dimensions: effect of eccentricity. Invest Ophthalmol 32:1269Google Scholar
  16. LeVay S, Connolly M, Houde J, Van Essen DC (1985) The complete pattern of ocular dominance stripes in the striate cortex and visual field of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 5:486–501Google Scholar
  17. Livingstone MS, Hubel DH (1984) Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex. J Neurosci 4:309–356Google Scholar
  18. Löwel S, Singer W (1987) The pattern of ocular dominance columns in flat mounts of the cat visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 68:661–666Google Scholar
  19. Löwel S, Freeman B, Singer W (1987) Topographic organization of the orientation column system in large flat-mounts of the cat visual cortex: a 2-deoxyglucose study. J Comp Neurol 155:401–415Google Scholar
  20. Michael CR (1981) Columnar organization of color cells in monkey's striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 46:587–604Google Scholar
  21. Nelson JI, Kato H, Bishop PO (1977) Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 40:260–283Google Scholar
  22. Payne BR, Berman N, Murphy EH (1981) Organization of direction preferences in cat visual cortex. Brain Res 211:445–450Google Scholar
  23. Regan D, Beverley KI (1983) Visual fields described by contrast sensitivity, by acuity, and by relative sensitivity to different orientations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24:754–759Google Scholar
  24. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, Volman SF (1976) Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. J Neurophysiol 39:1320–1333Google Scholar
  25. Sedgewick R (1988) Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading MassGoogle Scholar
  26. Swindale NV (1991) A model for the coordinated development of columnar systems in primate striate cortex. Biol Cybern (this volume)Google Scholar
  27. Swindale NV, Matsubara JA, Cynader MS (1987) Surface organization of orientation and direction selectivity in cat area 18. J Neurosci 7:1414–1427Google Scholar
  28. Tolhurst DJ, Dean AF, Thompson ID (1981) Preferred direction of movement as an element of organization of cat visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 44:340–342Google Scholar
  29. Tootell RBH, Hamilton SL, Silerman MS, Switkes E (1988a) Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. I. Ocular dominance, binocular interactions, baseline conditions. J Neurosci 8:1500–1530Google Scholar
  30. Tootell RBH, Switkes E, Silverman MS, Hamilton SL (1988b) Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. II Retinotopic organization. J Neurosci 8:1531–1568Google Scholar
  31. Tootell RBH, Silverman MS, Hamilton SL, De Valois RL, Switkes E (1988c) Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. III Color. J Neurosci 8:1569–1593Google Scholar
  32. Van Essen DC, Newsome WT, Maunsell JHR (1984) The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: asymmetries, anisotropies and individual variability. Vision Res 24:429–448Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. V. Swindale
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations