Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 103–113 | Cite as

Gabor filters as texture discriminator

  • I. Fogel
  • D. Sagi


The present paper presents a model for texture discrimination based on Gabor functions. In this model the Gabor power spectrum of the micropatterns corresponding to different textures is calculated. A function that measures the difference between the spectrum of two micropatterns is introduced and its values are correlated with human performance in preattentive detection tasks. In addition, a two stage algorithm for texture segregation is presented. In the first stage the input image is transformed via Gabor filters into a representation image that allows discrimination between features by means of intensity differences. In the second stage the borders between areas of different textures are found using a Laplacian of Gaussian operator. This algorithm is sensitive to energy differences, rotation and spatial frequency and is insensitive to local translation. The model was tested by means of several simulations and was found to be in good correlation with known psychophysical characteristics as texton based texture segregation and micropattern density sensitivity. However, this simple model fails to predict human performance in discrimination tasks based on differences in the density of “terminators”. In this case human performance is better than expected.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bajcsy R (1973) Computer description of textured surfaces. IJCAI 20–23Google Scholar
  2. Beck J (1972) Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty. Am J Psychol 85:1–19Google Scholar
  3. Beck J (1983) Textural segmentation, 2nd order statistics, and texture elements. Biol Cybern 48:125–130Google Scholar
  4. Beck J, Sutter A, Ivry R (1987) Spatial frequency channels and perceptual grouping in texture segregation. Comput Vision, Graph Image Proc 37:299–325Google Scholar
  5. Bergen JR, Adelson EH (1988) Early vision and texture perception. Nature (London) 333:363–364Google Scholar
  6. Bergen JR, Julesz B (1983) Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination. Nature 303:696–698Google Scholar
  7. Caelli T, Moraglia G (1985) On the detection of Gabor signals and discrimination of Gabor textures. Vision Res 25:671–684Google Scholar
  8. Daugman JD (1980) Two dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles. Vision Res 20:847–856Google Scholar
  9. Daugman JD (1987) Image analysis and compact coding by oriented 2-D Gabor primitives. SPIE Process 758:19–30Google Scholar
  10. Fairhurst MC, Stonham TJ (1976) A classification system for alphanumeric characters based on learning network techniques. Digital Process 2:321–339Google Scholar
  11. Gabor D (1946) Theory of communication. J IEE (London) 93:429–457Google Scholar
  12. Gurnsey R, Browse RA (1987) Micropattern and presentation conditions influencing visual texture discrimination. Percept Psychophys 41:238–252Google Scholar
  13. Hall EL (1979) Computer image processing and recognition. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Julesz B (1962) Visual pattern discrimination. IRE Trans Inf Theory 8:84–92Google Scholar
  15. Julesz B (1975) Experiments in the visual perception of texture. Sci Am 232:34–43Google Scholar
  16. Julesz B (1980) Spatial nonlinearities in the instantaneous perception of textures with identical power spectra. Phil Trans R Soc London B 290:83–94Google Scholar
  17. Julesz B (1981) Textons, the elements of texture perception and their interactions. Nature 290:91–97Google Scholar
  18. Julesz B (1984a) A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision. TINS 7:41–45Google Scholar
  19. Julesz B (1984b) Toward an axiomatic theory of preattentive vision. In: Edelman GM, Gall WE, Cowan WM (eds) Dynamic aspects of neurocortical function. Neurosciences Research Foundation, New York, pp 585–612Google Scholar
  20. Julesz B (1986) Texton gradients: The texton theory evisited. Biol Cybern 54:245–251Google Scholar
  21. Julesz B, Caelli T (1979) On the limit of Fourier decompositions in visual texture perception. Perception 8:69–73Google Scholar
  22. Julesz B, Krose BJA (1988) Features and spatial filters. Nature (London) 333:302–303Google Scholar
  23. Krose BJA (1986) A description of visual structure. PhD thesis, Department of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  24. Krose BJA (1987) Local structure analyzers as determinants of preattentive pattern discrimination. Biol Cybern 55:289–298Google Scholar
  25. Marcelja S (1980) Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am 70:1297–1300Google Scholar
  26. Nothdurft NC (1985) Sensitivity for structure gradient in texture discrimination task. Vision Res 25:1957–1968Google Scholar
  27. Rosenfeld A, Kak AC (1976) Digital picture processing. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Sagi D (1988) The combination of spatial frequency and orientation is effortlessly perceived. Percept Psychophys 43:601–603Google Scholar
  29. Sagi D (1989) Hierarchy of spatial filtering in early vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci [Suppl] 30:234Google Scholar
  30. Sagi D, Hochstein S (1983) Discriminability of superthreshold compound spatial frequency gratings. Vision Res 23:1595–1606Google Scholar
  31. Sagi D, Hochstein S (1985) Lateral inhibition between spatially adjacent spatial frequency channels? Percept Psychophys 37:315–322Google Scholar
  32. Sagi D, Julesz B (1987) Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. Spatial Vision 2:39–49Google Scholar
  33. Treisman A (1986) Feature and objects in visual processing. Sci Am 255:106–125Google Scholar
  34. Turner MR (1986) Texture discrimination by Gabor functions. Biol Cybern 55:71–82Google Scholar
  35. Voorees H, Poggio T (1988) Computing texture boundaries from images. Nature (London) 333:34–367Google Scholar
  36. Watson AB (1983) Detection and recognition of simple spatial forms. In: Braddick OJ, Sleigh AC (eds) Physical and biological processing of images. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson HR (1983) Psychophysical evidence for spatial channels. In: Braddick OJ, Sleigh AC (eds) Physical and biological processing of images. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Fogel
    • 1
  • D. Sagi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric OpticsSoreq Nuclear Research CenterYavneIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Applied Mathematics & Computer SciencesThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations