Responses of invertebrates and fish to alkyl sulfate and alkyl ethoxylate sulfate anionic surfactants during chronic exposure

  • S. E. Belanger
  • K. L. Rupe
  • R. G. Bausch
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldenberg T, Slob W (1993) Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 25:48–63Google Scholar
  2. Belanger SE (1990) The effect of dissolved oxygen, sediment, and sewage treatment plant discharges upon growth, survival and density of Asiatic clams. Hydrobiologia 218:113–126Google Scholar
  3. Belanger SE (1992) Use of experimental stream mesocosms to assess ecosystem risk: A case study with a cationic surfactant. In: Cairns J, Niederlehner BR, and Orvos DR (eds), Predicting Ecosystem Risk. Princeton Scientific Publishing Company, Princeton, New Jersey, p 262Google Scholar
  4. Belanger SE, Davidson DH, Farns JL, Reed D, Cherry DS (1993) Effects of cationic surfactant exposure to a bivalve mollusc in stream mesocosms. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:1789–1802Google Scholar
  5. Belanger SE (1994) Review of experimental microcosm, mesocosm, and field tests used to evaluate the potential hazard of surfactants to aquatic life and the relation to single species data. In: Hill IR, Heimbach F, Leeuwangh P, and Matthiessen P. (eds), Freshwater Field Tests for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan, p 326Google Scholar
  6. Belanger SE, Meiers EM, Bausch RG, Sweeney BN, Hart DD, Jackson JK, and Wolbach KC. Direct and indirect ecotoxicological effects of alkyl sulfate and alkyl ethoxysulfate on macroinvertebrates in stream mesocosms. Aquat Toxicol (In Press)Google Scholar
  7. Cowgill UM, Milazzo DP (1991) The response of the three brood Ceriodaphnia test to fifteen formulations and pure compounds in common use. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 21:35–40Google Scholar
  8. Fendinger NJ, Begley WM, McAvoy DC, Eckhoff WS (1992) Determination of alkyl sulfate surfactants in natural waters. Environ Sci Technol 26:2493–2498Google Scholar
  9. Fendinger NJ, Versteeg DJ, Weeg E, Dyer SD, Rapaport RA (1994) Environmental behavior and Fate of anionic surfactants. In: Baker LA (ed), Environmental Chemistry of lakes and Reservoirs, ACS Advances in Chemistry Series No. 237. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, p 528Google Scholar
  10. Larson RJ (1991) Biodegradation in regulating the environmental exposure of detergent chemicals. Chemical Trends Times (July 1991):47–56Google Scholar
  11. OECD (1992). Report of the OECD workshop on the extrapolation of laboratory aquatic toxicity data to the real environment. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  12. Popenoe DD, Morris SJ, Horn PS, and Norwood KT (1994) Determination of alkyl sulfates and alkyl ethoxysulfates in in wastewater treatment plant influents and effluents and river water using liquid chromatography/ion spray mass spectrometry. Analyt Chem 66:1620–1629Google Scholar
  13. Russell-Hunter WD, Browne RA, Aldridge DW (1984) Overwinter tissue degrowth in natural populations of freshwater pulmonate snails (Halisoma trivolvis and Lymnaea palustris). Ecology 65:223–229Google Scholar
  14. Statistical Analysis System (1990) SAS® User's Guide: Statistics. Version 5. Gary, NCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. E. Belanger
    • 1
  • K. L. Rupe
    • 1
  • R. G. Bausch
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Science Department, Ivorydale Technical CenterThe Procter & Gamble CompanyCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations