Environmental contaminants in eggs of California least terns (Sterna antillarum browni)

  • R. L. Hothem
  • S. G. Zador
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adrian WJ, Stevens ML (1979) Wet versus dry weights for heavy metal toxicity determinations in duck liver. J Wildl Dis 15:125–126Google Scholar
  2. Atwood JL, Minsky DE (1983) Least tern foraging ecology at three major California breeding colonies. West Birds 14:57–72Google Scholar
  3. Becker PH, Schuhmann S, Koepff C (1993) Hatching failure in common terns (Sterna hirundo) in relation to environmental chemicals. Environ Pollut 79:207–213Google Scholar
  4. Blus LJ (1982) Further interpretation of the relation of organochlorine residues in brown pelican eggs to reproductive success. Environ Pollut (Ser A) 28:15–33Google Scholar
  5. Blus LJ, Prouty RM (1979) Organochlorine pollutants and population status of least terns in South Carolina. Wilson Bull 91:62–71Google Scholar
  6. Boardman CJ (1988) Organochlorine pesticides in California least terns (Sterna antellarum browni). Master's Thesis, Calif. State Univ., Long Beach 25 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Connors PG, Anderlini VC, Risebrough RW, Gilbertson M, Hays H (1975) Investigations of heavy metals in common tern populations. Can Field-Nat 89:157–162Google Scholar
  8. Custer TW, Bunck CM, Stafford CJ (1985) Organochlorine concentrations in prefledging common terns at three Rhode Island colonies. Colon Waterbirds 8:150–154Google Scholar
  9. Custer TW, Erwin RM, Stafford C (1983) Organochlorine residues in common tern eggs from nine atlantic coast colonies, 1980. Colon Waterbirds 6:197–204Google Scholar
  10. Fox GA, Weseloh DV (1987) Colonial waterbirds as bio-indicators of environmental contamination in the Great Lakes. In: Diamond AW, Filion FL (eds) The Value of Birds, International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, England, Tech Publ 6:209–216Google Scholar
  11. Gilbertson M (1974) Seasonal changes in organochlorine compounds and mercury in common terns of Hamilton Harbor, Ontario. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 12:726–732Google Scholar
  12. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Krynitsky AJ, Weller DMG (1987) Reproduction in mallards fed selenium. Environ Toxicol Chem 6:423–433Google Scholar
  13. King KA, Custer TW, Quinn JS (1991) Effects of mercury, selenium, and organochlorine contaminants on reproduction of Forster's terns and black skimmers nesting in a contaminated Texas Bay. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 20:32–40Google Scholar
  14. Massey BW (1974) Breeding biology of the California least tern. Proc Linn Soc NY 72:1–24Google Scholar
  15. Massey BW, Bradley DW, Atwood JL (1992) Demography of a California least tern colony including effects of the 1982–1983 El Niño. Condor 94:976–983Google Scholar
  16. Ohlendorf HM (1989) Bioaccumulation and effects of selenium in wildlife. In: Jacobs LW (ed) Selenium in Agriculture and the Environment, SSSA Special Publ No. 23. Amer Soc Agronomy and Soil Sci Soc Amer, Madison, WI, pp 133–177Google Scholar
  17. Ohlendorf HM, Custer TW, Lowe RW, Rigney M, Cromartie E (1988) Organochlorines and mercury in eggs of coastal terns and herons in California, USA. Colon Waterbirds 11:85–94Google Scholar
  18. Ohlendorf HM, Hothem RL, Bunck CM, Aldrich TW, Moore JF (1986) Relationships between selenium concentrations and avian reproduction. Trans N Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 51:330–342Google Scholar
  19. Ohlendorf HM, Schaffner FC, Custer TW, Stafford CJ (1985) Reproduction and organochlorine contaminants in terns at San Diego Bay. Colon Waterbirds 8:42–53Google Scholar
  20. Stickel LF, Wiemeyer SN, Blus LJ (1973) Pesticide residues in eggs of wild birds: adjustment for loss of moisture and lipid. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 9:193–196Google Scholar
  21. Struger J, Weseloh DV (1985) Great Lakes Caspian terns: egg contaminants and biological implications. Colon Waterbirds 8:142–149Google Scholar
  22. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1980) California least tern recovery plan. U.S. Fish Wildl Serv, Region 1, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. Hothem
    • 1
  • S. G. Zador
    • 2
  1. 1.National Biological Service, California Pacific Science Center, Davis Field Station, c/o Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.San Francisco Bay National Wildlife RefugeU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations