Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 66, Issue 4, pp 319–325

Bifurcation analysis of a neural network model

  • Roman M. Borisyuk
  • Alexandr B. Kirillov
Article

Abstract

This paper describes the analysis of the well known neural network model by Wilson and Cowan. The neural network is modeled by a system of two ordinary differential equations that describe the evolution of average activities of excitatory and inhibitory populations of neurons. We analyze the dependence of the model's behavior on two parameters. The parameter plane is partitioned into regions of equivalent behavior bounded by bifurcation curves, and the representative phase diagram is constructed for each region. This allows us to describe qualitatively the behavior of the model in each region and to predict changes in the model dynamics as parameters are varied. In particular, we show that for some parameter values the system can exhibit long-period oscillations. A new type of dynamical behavior is also found when the system settles down either to a stationary state or to a limit cycle depending on the initial point.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold VI (1978) Supplementary chapters of the theory of ordinary differential equations. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. Baird B (1989) A bifurcation theory approach to the programming of periodic attractors in networks models of olfactory cortex. In: Touretzky S (eds). Advs Neural Inf Process Syst 1:459–467Google Scholar
  3. Balabaev NK, Lunevskaya LV (1978) Motion along a curve in an n-dimensional space. FORTRAN algorithms and programs. Issue 1. Pushchino, Acad Sci USSR (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. Bautin NN, Leontovitch EA (1976) Methods and techniques of the qualitative analysis of dynamical systems on the plane. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. Bogdanov RI (1976) Versal deformation of a singular point of the vector field on the plane for a nonzero eigenvalue. In: Works of IG Petrovsky Seminar, Issue 2. Moscow State University Press, Moscow:37–65 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. Borisyuk RM (1981) Stationary solutions of a system of differential equations depending on parameters. FORTRAN algorithms and programs. Issue 6. Acad Sci USSR, Pushchino (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. Borisyuk RM (1990) Interacting neural oscillators can imitate the selective attention. In: Holden AV, Kryukov VI (eds) Neurocomputers and attention. Manchester University Press, Manchester (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Borisyuk RM, Kirillov AB (1982) A qualitative study of a model of neural network consisting of two homogeneous populations. Preprint. Acad Sci USSR, Pushchino (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. Borisyuk RM, Urzhumtseva LM (1990) Dynamical regimes in a system of interacting neural oscillators. In: Holden AV, Kryukov VI (eds) Neural Networks: theory and architecture. Manchester University Press, Manchester (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Bragin AG, Sbitnev VI (1980) The septal input to the CA3 hippocampal field. 1. Identifying the states. Biofizika 25:190 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. Buhmann J, von der Malsburg C (1991) Sensory segmentation by neural oscillators. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks — 1991, 2:603–608Google Scholar
  12. Carpenter GA, Grossberg S (1987) A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine. Cornput Vision Graph Image Process 37:54–115Google Scholar
  13. Freeman WJ, Scarda CA (1985) Spatial EEG patterns, nonlinear dynamics and perception: the Neo-Sherringtonian view. Brain Res Rev 10:147–175Google Scholar
  14. Gantmakher PhR (1967) The theory of matrices. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. Gray CM, Singer W (1989) Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:1698–1702Google Scholar
  16. Hopfield J (1984) Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 81:3088–3092Google Scholar
  17. Khibnik AI (1979) Periodic solutions of a system of differential equations. FORTRAN algorithms and programs. Issue 5. Acad Sci USSR, Pushchino (in Russian)Google Scholar
  18. Khibnik AI (1990a) Using TRAX: A tutorial to Accompany TRAX, a program for simulation and analysis of dynamical systems. Exeter Software, Setauket, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Khibnik AI (1990b) LINLBF: A program for continuation and bifurcation analysis of equilibria up to codimension three. In: Roose D (eds) Continuation and bifurcations: numerical techniques and applications. Kluwer, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Khibnik AI and Shnol EE (1982) Software for qualitative analysis of differential equations. Acad Sci USSR, Pushchino (in Russian)Google Scholar
  21. Kuznetsov UA (1983) One-dimensional separatrix of the system of ordinary differential equations with parameters. FORTRAN algorithms and programs. Issue 8. Acad Sci USSR, Pushchino (in Russian)Google Scholar
  22. Levitin W (1989) TRAX: Simulation and analysis of dynamical systems. Version 1. 1. Exeter Software, Setauket, NYGoogle Scholar
  23. Nicolis JS (1985) Chaotic dynamics of information processing with relevance to cognitive brain functions. Kybernetes 14:167–172Google Scholar
  24. Sbitnev VI, Gulayev AA and Bragin AG (1982) Dynamical models of the functional organization of hippocampus. In: Memory and learing mechanisms. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  25. Schuster HG and Wagner P (1990) A model for neuronal oscillations in the visual cortex. Biol Cybern 64:77–85Google Scholar
  26. Shimizu H, Yamaguchi Y and Satoh K (1988) Holovision: a semantic information processor for visual perception. In: Kelso JAS, Mandel AJ, Shlesinger MF (eds) Dynamic patterns in complex systems. World Scientific, SignaporeGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson HR and Cowan JD (1972) Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophys J 12:2–24Google Scholar
  28. Zarhin YuG and Kovalenko VN (1978) Finding solutions of a system of two algebraic equations. FORTRAN algorithms and programs. Issue 2. Acad Sci USSR, Pushchino (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roman M. Borisyuk
    • 1
  • Alexandr B. Kirillov
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Computing Center of the USSR Academy of SciencesPushchino, Moscow RegionUSSR
  2. 2.Department of Cell Biology and NeuroscienceUT Southwestern Medical CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations