Drug smuggling by ingested cocaine-filled packages: conventional x-ray and ultrasound
- 223 Downloads
To evaluate the imaging characteristics and the diagnostic value of both abdominal ultrasound and conventional abdominal x-ray in identifying ingested drug packages in “body packers.”
Materials and Methods
Twelve individuals were studied prospectively by abdominal ultrasound and by abdominal x-ray to rule out incorporated drug containers.
Both abdominal ultrasound and abdominal x-ray correctly identified the 7 of 12 individuals who had ingested multiple drug packages. In 5 of the 12 individuals, ultrasound as well as abdominal x-ray were correctly unremarkable with regard to abdominal foreign bodies.
Abdominal ultrasound and abdominal x-ray both represent valuable diagnostic tools in the assessment of ingested drug packages. Abdominal x-ray is superior to ultrasound in differentiating ingested drug-filled condoms from “pseudocondoms.”
Key wordsCocaine Body packers Drug smuggling Abdominal ultrasound Abdominal x-ray
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Sinner W. The gastrointestinal tract as a vehicle for drug smuggling. Gastrointest Radiol 1981;6:319–323Google Scholar
- 2.Rauber K, Müller D. Abdomenübersichtsaufnahme zur Identifizierung von Rauschgiftschmugglern. Dtsch Med Wschr 1983;108:1549–1551Google Scholar
- 3.Suarez CA, Arango A, Lester JL. Cocaine-condom ingestion. JAMA 1977;238:1391–1392Google Scholar
- 4.Freed TA, Sweet LN, Gauder PJ. Balloon obturation bowel obstruction: a hazard of drug smuggling. AJR 1976;127:1033–1034Google Scholar
- 5.Fischbain DA, Wetli CV. Cocaine intoxication, delirium, and death in a body-packer. Ann Emerg Med 1980;9:429–430Google Scholar
- 6.Birnbaum BA, Balthazar EJ. Alcohol and drug abuse. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, Laufer I, eds. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology, vol. 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1994:2626–2635Google Scholar
- 7.Wackerle B, Rupp N, V Clarmann M, Kahn T, Heller H, Feuerbach S. Demonstration of narcotic packages in “body-packers” by various imaging methods. In vitro and in vivo investigations [in German]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1986;145:274–277Google Scholar
- 8.Pinsky MF, Ruggene DJ. Narcotic smuggling: the double-condom signs. J Can Assoc Radiol 1978;29:78–81Google Scholar