World Journal of Urology

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 162–166 | Cite as

Urodynamic assessment of pelvic floor training

  • I. Hahn
  • J. Nauclér
  • S. Sommar
  • M. Fall
Free Paper


The object of this study was to evaluate the function of the pelvic floor and urethral sphincters in women with genuine stress incontinence before and after treatment. A total of 20 patients were randomized to 6 months' pelvic floor training or electrical stimulation. They were assessed by comprehensive analysis of pressure recordings in the urethra, vagina and anus. There were few significant correlations between subjective effect, pad tests and urodynamic results. Urethral, vaginal and anal profilometry is of limited value for assessment of training effects.


Public Health Electrical Stimulation Pelvic Floor Comprehensive Analysis Stress Incontinence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ask P, Hök B (1990) Pressure measurement techniques in urodynamic investigations. Neurourol Urodyn 9:1–15Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asmussen M, Ulmsten U (1976) A new technique for measurements of the urethral pressure profile. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 55:167–173Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonnesen T, Kielmann J, Frimodt-Møller C, Mortensen S (1978) Anal profilometry — a new method for investigating the function of the anal sphincter and the pelvic floor. Proceedings, 8th International Continence Society Meeting, Manchester, 31 Aug.–2 Sept., 141–145Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradley JW (1968) Distribution-free statistical tests. Prentice-Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown M, Wickham JEA (1969) The urethral pressure profile. Br J Urol 41:211–217Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bump RC, Copeland WE Jr, Hurt WG, Fantl JA (1988) Dynamic urethral pressure/profilometry pressure transmission ratio determinations in stress-incontinent and stress-continent subjects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:749–755Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Enhörning G (1961) Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intraurethral pressure. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 276:14–17Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fall M, Ahlström K, Carlsson CA, Ek A, Erlandson BE, Frankenberg S, Mattiasson A (1986) Contelle-pelvic floor stimulator for female stress-urge incontinence. A multicenter study. Urology 27:282–287Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hahn I, Fall M, Sommar S (1991) A comparative study of pelvic floor training and electrical stimulation for the treatment of genuine female stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn (in press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henriksson L, Ulmsten U, Andersson K (1977) The effects of changes of posture on the urethral closure pressure in stress incontinent women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 11:207–210Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hilton P, Stanton SL (1983) Urethral pressure measurement by microtransducer: the results in symptom-free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90:919–933Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kegel AH (1948) Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles. Am J Obst Gynecol 56:238–248Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kujansuu E (1983) The effect of pelvic floor exercises on urethral function in female stress urinary incontinence: an urodynamic study. Ann Chir Gynaecol 72:28–32Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Plevnik S, Janez J, Vrtacnik P, Brown M (1985) Directional differences in urethral pressure recordings: contribution from the stiffness and weight of the recording catheter. Neurourol Urodyn 4:117–128Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rud T (1980) Urethral pressure profile in continent women from childhood to old age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 59:331–335Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sørensen S (1988) Urodynamic investigations and their reproducibility in healthy postmenopausal females. Scand J Urol Nephrol [Suppl] 114:42–47Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sørensen S, Gregersen H, Sørensen SM (1988) Long-term reproducibility of urodynamic investigations in healthy fertile females. Scand J Urol Nephrol [Suppl] 114:35–41Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sutherst J, Brown M, Shawer M (1981) Assessing the severity of urinary incontinence by weighing perineal pads. Lancet I:1128–1130Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tapp AJS, Cardozo LD, Versi E, Studd JWW (1988) The prevalence of variation of resting urethral pressure in women and its association with lower urinary tract function. Br J Urol 61:314–317Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tarfusser I, Fall M (1989) Urethral pressure profile measurement in the preoperative assessment of female urethral damage. World J Urol 6:246–249Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tschou DCH, Adams C, Varner RE, Denton B (1988) Pelvic floor musculature exercises in treatment of anatomical urinary stress incontinence. Phys Ther 68:652–655Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Versi E, Cardozo L, Studd J, Cooper D (1986) Evaluation of urethral pressure profilometry for the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence. World J Urol 4:6–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Hahn
    • 1
  • J. Nauclér
    • 1
  • S. Sommar
    • 1
  • M. Fall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUrodynamic LaboratoryGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations