Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 73, Issue 5, pp 457–465 | Cite as

On the comparison of Feller and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models for neural activity

  • Petr Lánský
  • Laura Sacerdote
  • Francesca Tomassetti
Original Papers


Diffusion processes have been extensively used to describe membrane potential behavior. In this approach the interspike interval has a theoretical counterpart in the first-passage-time of the diffusion model employed. Since the mathematical complexity of the first-passage-time problem increases with attempts to make the models more realistic it seems useful to compare the features of different models in order to highlight their relative performance. In this paper we compare the Feller and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models under three different criteria derived from the level of information available about their parameters. We conclude that the Feller model is preferable when complete knowledge of the characterizing parameters is assumed. On the other hand, when only limited information about the parameters is available, such as the mean firing time and the histogram shape, no advantage arises from using this more complex model.


Diffusion Process Complex Model Diffusion Model Neural Activity Relative Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aertsen A (ed) (1993) Brain theory, Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Buonocore A, Nobile AG, Ricciardi LM (1987) A new integral equation for the evaluation of first-passage-time probability densities. Adv Appl Prob 19:784–800Google Scholar
  3. Capocelli RM, Ricciardi LM (1971) Diffusion approximation and the first passage time for a model neuron. Kybernetik 8:214–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox DR, Miller HD (1965) The theory of stochastic processes. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Durbin J (1971) Boundary-crossing probabilities for the Brownian motion and Poisson processes and techniques for computing the power of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. J Appl Prob 8:431–453Google Scholar
  6. Feller W (1951) Diffusion processes in genetics. In: Neyman J (ed) Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 227–246Google Scholar
  7. Gibbons JD (1971) Nonparametric statistical inference. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Giorno V, Lánský P, Nobile AG, Ricciardi LM (1988) Diffusion approximation and first-passage-time problem for a model neuron. III. A birth-and-death process approach. Biol Cybern 58:387–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Giorno V, Nobile AG, Ricciardi LM, Sato S (1989) On the evaluation of first-passage-time probability densities via nonsingular integral equations. Adv Appl Prob 21:20–36Google Scholar
  10. Giorno V, Nobile AG, Ricciardi LM (1990) On the asymptotic behavior of first-passage-time densities for one-dimensional diffusion processes and varying boundaries. Adv Appl Prob 22:883–914Google Scholar
  11. Hanson FB, Tuckwell HC (1983) Diffusion approximation for neuronal activity including synaptic reversal potentials. J Theor Neurobiol 2:127–153Google Scholar
  12. Inoue J, Sato S, Ricciardi LM (1994) On the parameter estimation for diffusion models of single neurons' activity. Biol Cybern 73:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kallianpur G (1983) On the diffusion approximation to a discontinuous model for a single neuron. In: Sen PK (ed) Contributions to statistics. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Kallianpur G, Wolpert RL (1987) Weak convergence of stochastic neuronal models. In: Kimura M, Kallianpur G, Hida T (eds) Stochastic methods in biology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 116–145Google Scholar
  15. Karlin S, Taylor HM (1981) A second course in stochastic processes. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Keilson J, Ross HF (1975) Passage time distributions for Gaussian Markov (Ornstein-Uhlenbeck) statistical processes. Selected Tables in Mathematical Statistics 3:233–327Google Scholar
  17. Lánská V, Lánsky P, Smith CA (1994) Synaptic transmission in a diffusion model for neural activity. J Theor Biol 166:393–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lánský P (1984) On approximations of Stein's neuronal model. J Theor Biol 107:631–647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lánský P, Lánská V (1987) Diffusion approximations of the neuronal model with synaptic reversal potentials. Biol Cybern 56:19–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lánsky P, Lánská V (1994) First-passage-time problem for simulated stochastic diffusion processes. Comput Biol Med 24:91–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lánský P, Musila M (1991) Variable initial depolarization in Stein's neuronal model with synaptic reversal potentials. Biol Cybern 64:285–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. McKenna T, Davis J, Zornetzer SF (eds) (1992) Single neuron computation. Academic Press, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
  23. Musila M, Lánský P (1994) On the interspike intervals calculated from diffusion approximations of Stein's neuronal model with reversal potential. J Theor Biol 171:225–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nobile AG, Ricciardi LM, Sacerdote L (1985) Exponential trends of first-passage-time densities for a class of diffusion processes with steady-state distribution. J Appl Prob 22:611–618Google Scholar
  25. Pribram KH (eds) (1994) Origins: Brain and self organization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  26. Ricciardi LM (1977) Diffusion processes and related topics in biology, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  27. Ricciardi LM, Sacerdote L (1979) The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process as a model of neuronal activity. Biol Cybern 35:1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ricciardi LM, Sato S (1990) Diffusion processes and first-passage-time problems. In: Ricciardi LM (ed) Lectures in applied mathematics and informatics. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  29. Ricciardi LM, Sacerdote L, Sato S (1983) Diffusion approximation and first-passage-time problem for a model neuron. II. Outline of a computation method. Math Biosci 64:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sacerdote L, Tomassetti F (1994) On evaluation and asymptotic approximations of first-passage-time probabilities. PreprintGoogle Scholar
  31. Sato S (1978) On the moments of the firing interval of diffusion approximated neuron. Math Biosci 34:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmidt RF (ed) (1984) Fundamentals of neurophysiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Stein RB (1965) A theoretical analysis of neuronal variability. Biophys J 5:173–195Google Scholar
  34. Tuckwell HC (1979) Synaptic transmission in a model for stochastic neural activity. J Theor Biol 77:65–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tuckwell HC (1988) Introduction to theoretical neurobiology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Tuckwell HC, Cope DK (1980) Accuracy of neuronal interspike times calculated from a diffusion approximation. J Theor Biol 83:377–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tuckwell HC, Richter W (1978) Neuronal interspike time distributions and the estimation of neurophysiological and neuroanatomical arameters. J Theor Biol 71:167–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ventriglia F (eds) (1994) Neural modeling and neural networks. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilbur AJ, Rinzel J (1983) A theoretical basis for large coefficient of variation and bimodality in neuronal interspike interval distribution. J Theor Biol 105:345–368PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petr Lánský
    • 1
  • Laura Sacerdote
    • 2
  • Francesca Tomassetti
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Physiology and Center for Theoretical Study, Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrague 4Czech Republic
  2. 2.Dipartimento di MatematicaUniversitá di TorinoTurinItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Matematica e ApplicazioniUniversitá di NapoliNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations