Advertisement

Planta

, Volume 196, Issue 2, pp 357–366 | Cite as

Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis

  • Nicanor Z. Saliendra
  • John S. Sperry
  • Jonathan P. Comstock
Article

Abstract

Whole-canopy measurements of water flux were used to calculate stomatal conductance (g s ) and transpiration (E) for seedlings of western water birch (Betula occidentalis Hook.) under various soil-plant hydraulic conductances (k), evaporative driving forces (ΔN; difference in leaf-to-air molar fraction of water vapor), and soil water potentials (Ψs). As expected, g s dropped in response to decreased k or ΨS, or increased ΔN(> 0.025). Field data showed a decrease in mid-day g s with decreasing k from soil-to-petiole, with sapling and adult plants having lower values of both parameters than juveniles. Stomatal closure prevented E and Ψ from inducing xylem cavitation except during extreme soil drought when cavitation occurred in the main stem and probably roots as well. Although all decreases in g s were associated with approximately constant bulk leaf water potential (ψl), this does not logically exclude a feedback response between ΨL and g s . To test the influence of leaf versus root water status on g s , we manipulated water status of the leaf independently of the root by using a pressure chamber enclosing the seedling root system; pressurizing the chamber alters cell turgor and volume only in the shoot cells outside the chamber. Stomatal closure in response to increased ΔN, decreased k, and decreased ΨS was fully or partially reversed within 5 min of pressurizing the soil. Bulk ΨL remained constant before and after soil pressurizing because of the increase in E associated with stomatal opening. When ΔN was low (i.e., < 0.025), pressurizing the soil either had no effect on g s , or caused it to decline; and bulk ΨL increased. Increased Ψl may have caused stomatal closure via increased backpressure on the stomatal apparatus from elevated epidermal turgor. The stomatal response to soil pressurizing indicated a central role of leaf cells in sensing water stress caused by high ΔN, low k, and low ΨS. Invoking a prominent role for feedforward signalling in short-term stomatal control may be premature.

Key words

Betula (water relations) Hydraulic versus chemical signalling Transpiration Water relations Water stress Xylem cavitation 

Abbreviations

ABA

abscisic acid

E

transpiration rate

gb

boundary-layer conductance to water vapor

gs

stomatal conductance to water vapor

gt

total conductance to water vapor

k

leaf-specific hydraulic conductance, subscripts

S-T

soil to trunk

T-P

trunk to petiole

T-L

trunk to lamina

S-P

soil to petiole

S-L

soil to lamina

ΔN

difference in molar fraction of water vapor inside the leaf and ambient air

Ψ

water potential, subscripts

S

soil

T

trunk

L

leaf

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chazen, O., Newmann, P.M. (1994) Hydraulic signals from the roots and rapid cell-wall hardening in growing maize (Zea mays L.) leaves are primary responses to polyethylene glycol-induced water deficits. Plant Physiol. 104, 1385–1392Google Scholar
  2. Comstock, J., Ehleringer, J. (1993) Stomatal response to humidity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): implications for maximum transpiration rate, water-use efficiency and productivity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 20, 669–691Google Scholar
  3. Davies, W.J., Zhang, J. (1991) Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 55–76Google Scholar
  4. Donovan, L.A., Ehleringer, J.R. (1992) Contrasting water-use patterns among size and life-history classes of a semi-arid shrub. Funct. Ecol. 6, 482–488Google Scholar
  5. Farquhar, G.D. (1978) Feedforward responses of stomata to humidity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5, 787–800Google Scholar
  6. Fuchs, E., Livingston, N. (1994) Hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in douglas fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii) and alder (Alnus oregona) in drying soils. (Abstr.) Plant Physiol. 105, Suppl., 14Google Scholar
  7. Gollan, T., Passioura, J.B., Munns, R. (1986) Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 459–464Google Scholar
  8. Grantz, D.G. (1990) Plant response to atmospheric humidity. Plant Cell Environ. 13, 667–679Google Scholar
  9. Janes, B.E., Gee, G.W. (1973) Changes in transpiration, net carbon dioxide assimilation and leaf water potential resulting from application of hydrostatic pressure to roots of intact pepper plants. Physiol. Plant. 28, 201–208Google Scholar
  10. Jones, H.G. (1990) Physiological aspects of the control of water status in horticultural crops. HortSci. 25, 19–26Google Scholar
  11. Jones, H.G., Sutherland, R.A. (1991) Stomatal control of xylem embolism. Plant Cell Environ. 14, 607–612Google Scholar
  12. Ludlow, M.M. (1980) Adaptive significance of stomatal responses to water stress. In: Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress, pp. 123–138, Turner, N.C., Kramer, P.J., eds. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Malone, M. (1993) Hydraulic signals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser on B 341, 33–39Google Scholar
  14. Markhart, A.H., Smit, B. (1990) Measurement of root hydraulic conductance. HortSci. 25, 282–287Google Scholar
  15. McDermitt, D.K. (1990) Sources of error in the estimation of stomatal conductance and transpiration from porometer data. HortSci. 25, 1538–1548Google Scholar
  16. Meinzer, F.C. (1993) Stomatal control of transpiration. Tree 8, 289–294Google Scholar
  17. Meinzer, F.C., Grantz, D.G. (1990) Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity. Plant Cell Environ. 13, 383–388Google Scholar
  18. Meinzer, F.C., Goldstein, G., Neufeld, H.S., Grantz, D.A., Crisosto, G.M. (1992) Hydraulic architecture of sugarcane in relation to patterns of water use during plant development. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 471–477Google Scholar
  19. Mott, K.A., Cardon, Z.G., Berry, J.A. (1993) Asymmetric patchy stomatal closure for the two surfaces of Xanthium strumarium L. leaves at low humidity. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 25–34Google Scholar
  20. Nonami, H., Schulze, E.D., Zeigler, H. (1990) Mechanisms of stomatal movement in response to air humidity, irradiance and xylem water potential. Planta 183, 57–64Google Scholar
  21. Passioura, J.B., Munns, R. (1984) Hydraulic resistance of plants. II. Effects of rooting medium, and time of day, in barley and lupin. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11, 341–350Google Scholar
  22. Pierce, M., Raschke, K. (1980) Correlation between loss of turgor and accumulation of abscisic acid in detached leaves. Planta 148, 341–350Google Scholar
  23. Raschke, K. (1970) Stomatal responses to pressure changes and interruptions in the water supply of detached leaves of Zea mays L. Plant Physiol. 45, 415–423Google Scholar
  24. Raschke, K. (1987) Action of Abscisic acid on guard cells. In: Stomatal function, pp. 253–280, Zeiger, E., Farquhar, G.D., Cowan, I.R., eds. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Schulze, E.D. (1991) Water and nutrient interactions with plant water stress. In: Response of plants to multiple stresses, Mooney, H.A., Winner, W.E., Pell, E.J., eds. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Schulze, E.D. (1993) Soil water deficits and atmospheric humidity as environmental signals, In: Water deficits; plant responses from cell to community, pp. 129–146, Smith, J.A.C., Griffiths, H., eds. Bios Scientific Publishers LTD, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Schurr, U., Gollan, T., Schulze, E.D. (1992) Stomatal response to drying soil in relation to changes in the xylem sap composition of Helianthus annuus. II. Stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid imported from the xylem sap. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 561–567Google Scholar
  28. Shackel, K.A., Brinckmann, E. (1985) In situ measurement of epidermal cell turgor, leaf water potential and gas exchange in Tradescantia virginiana L. Plant Physiol. 78, 66–70Google Scholar
  29. Sperry, J.S., Alder, N.N., Eastlack, S.E. (1993) The effect of reduced hydraulic conductance on stomatal conductance and xylem cavitation. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 1075–1082Google Scholar
  30. Sperry, J.S., Donnelly, J.R., Tyree, M.T. (1988) A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem. Plant Cell Environ. 11, 35–40Google Scholar
  31. Sperry, J.S., Saliendra, N.Z. (1994) Intra- and inter-plant variation in xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis. Plant Cell Environ. 17, 1233–1241Google Scholar
  32. Tardieu, F. (1993) Will increases in our understanding of soil-root relations and root signalling substantially alter water flux models? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 341, 57–66Google Scholar
  33. Tardieu, F., Davies, W.J. (1993) Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 341–349Google Scholar
  34. Teskey, R.O., Hinckley, T.M., Grier, C.C. (1983) Effect of interruption of flow path on stomatal conductance of Abies amabilis. J. Exp. Bot. 34, 1251–1259Google Scholar
  35. Turner, N.C. (1974) Stomatal response to light and water under field conditions. In: Mechanisms of regulation of plant growth, Bieleski, R.L., Ferguson, A.R, Cresswell, M.M., eds. R. Soc. NZ Bull. 12, 423–432Google Scholar
  36. Turner, N.C. (1986) Crop water deficits: a decade of progress. Adv. Agron. 39, 1–51Google Scholar
  37. Tyree, M.T., Sperry, J.S. (1988) Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? Answers from a model. Plant Physiol. 88, 574–580Google Scholar
  38. Von Caemmerer, S., Farquhar, G.D. (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153, 376–387Google Scholar
  39. Zimmermann, M.H. (1983) Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang, J., Davies, W.J. (1991) Antitranspirant activity in xylem sap of maize. J. Exp. Bot. 42, 317–321Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicanor Z. Saliendra
    • 1
  • John S. Sperry
    • 1
  • Jonathan P. Comstock
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations