Planta

, Volume 194, Issue 1, pp 123–135 | Cite as

Reversible cytoplasmic rearrangements precede wall apposition, hypersensitive cell death and defense-related gene activation in potato/Phytophthora infestans interactions

  • Sibylle Freytag
  • Nikolaos Arabatzis
  • Klaus Hahlbrock
  • Elmon Schmelzer
Article

Abstract

We used video microscopy techniques as a tool for live examination of the dynamic aspects of plant/fungus interactions. Early, dynamic responses of epidermal midrib cells of leaves from a potato cultivar (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Datura) carrying resistance gene R1 to Phytophthora infestans (race 1: compatible interaction, race 4: incompatible interaction) were monitored. Similar responses were observed in both types of interaction, ranging from no visible reaction of invaded plant cells to hypersensitive cell death. The overall defense response of each individual cell exhibited a highly dynamic behavior that appeared to be tightly coordinated with the growth of the fungus. Initial localized reactions, including major rearrangements within the cytoplasm, occurred directly at the fungal penetration site, where rapid apposition of autofluorescent material and callose took place. If fungal invasion stopped at this stage, the host cell restored its normal cytoplasmic activity and survived. Hypersensitive cell death occurred only when fungal growth had proceeded to the formation of a clearly identifiable haustorium. In such cases, cytoplasm and nucleus conglomerated around the intracellular fungal structure, followed by a sudden collapse of the whole conglomerate and an instantaneous collapse of the fungal haustorium. Only small quantitative differences between the compatible and incompatible interactions of the two fungal races were observed for these early responses of epidermal cells. In the incompatible interaction, a slightly larger number of epidermal cells responded to fungal attack. More pronounced quantitative differences between compatible and incompatible interactions occurred upon fungal invasion of the mesophyll. These differences in the number of responding cells were not reflected at the level of gene expression: the spatial and temporal activation patterns of two defense-related genes, encoding phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and pathogenesis-related protein 1, were similar in both types of interaction.

Key words

Defense-related genes Hypersensitive cell death In situ hybridization Late blight Wall apposition Solanum tuberosum 

Abbreviations

PAL

phenylalanine ammonia-lyase

PR1

pathogenesis-related protein 1

FITC

fluorescein isothiocyanate

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aist, J.R., Israel, H.W. (1977) Papilla formation: timing and significance during penetration of barley coleoptiles by Erysiphe graminis hordei. Phytopathology 67, 455–461Google Scholar
  2. Chen, C.Y., Heath, M.C. (1991) Cytological studies of the hypersensitive death of cowpea epidermal cells induced by basidiospore-derived infection by the cowpea rust fungus. Can. J. Bot. 69, 1199–1206Google Scholar
  3. Coffey, M.D., Wilson, U.E. (1983) Histology and cytology of infection and disease caused by Phytophthora. In: Phytophthora, pp. 289–301, Erwin, D.C., Bartnicki-Garcia, S., Tsao, P.H., eds. Am. Phytopath. Soc., St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuypers, B., Hahlbrock, K. (1988) Immunohistochemical studies of compatible and incompatible interactions of potato leaves with Phytophthora infestans and of the nonhost response to Phytophthora megasperma. Can. J. Bot. 66, 700–705Google Scholar
  5. Cuypers, B., Schmelzer, E., Hahlbrock, K. (1988) In situ localization of rapidly accumulated phenylalanine ammonia-lyase mRNA around penetration sites of Phytophthora infestans in potato leaves. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1, 157–160Google Scholar
  6. Doke, N. (1982) A further study on the role of hypersensitivity in resistance of potato cultivars to infection by an incompatible race of Phytophthora infestans. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 21, 85–95Google Scholar
  7. Ferris, V. (1955) Histological study of pathogen-suscept relationships between Phytophthora infestans and derivatives of Solanum demissum. Phytopathology 45, 546–552Google Scholar
  8. Flor, H.H., (1971) Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 9, 275–298Google Scholar
  9. Gees, R., Hohl, H.R. (1988) Cytological comparison of specific (R3) and general resistance to late blight in potato leaf tissue. Phytopathology 78, 350–357Google Scholar
  10. Groß, P., Julius, C., Schmelzer, E., Hahlbrock, K. (1993) Translocation of cytoplasm and nucleus to fungal penetration sites is associated with depolymerisation of microtubules and defense gene activation in infected, cultured parsley cells. EMBO J. 12, 1735–1744Google Scholar
  11. Hächler, H., Hohl, H.R. (1984) Temporal and spatial distribution patterns of collar and papillae wall appositions in resistant and susceptible tuber tissue of Solanum tuberosum infected by Phytophthora infestans. Physiol. Plant Pathology 24, 107–118Google Scholar
  12. Hahlbrock, K., Arabatzis, N., Becker-André, M., Joos, H.-J., Kombrink, E., Schröder, M., Strittmatter, G., Taylor, J. (1989) Local and systemic gene activation in fungus-infected potato leaves. In: Signal molecules and plant-microbe interactions (NATO ASI Series, vol. H 36) pp. 242–249, mLugtenberg, B.J.J., ed. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Hazen, B.E., Bushnell, W.R. (1983) Inhibition of the hypersensitive reaction in barley to powdery mildew by heat shock and cytochalasin B. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 23, 421–438Google Scholar
  14. Hohl, H.R., Suter, E. (1976) Host-parasite interfaces in a resistant and a susceptible cultivar of Solanum tuberosum inoculated with Phytophthora infestans: leaf tissue. Can. J. Bot. 54, 1956–1970Google Scholar
  15. Joos, H-J., Hahlbrock, K. (1992) Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.): Genomic complexity, structural comparison of two selected genes, and modes of expression. Eur. J. Biochem. 204, 621–629Google Scholar
  16. Kitazawa, K., Tomiyama, K. (1969) Microscopic observations of infection of potato cells by compatible and incompatible races of Phytophthora infestans.Phytopath. Z. 66, 317–324Google Scholar
  17. Kitazawa, K., Inagaki, H., Tomiyama, K. (1973) Cinephotomicro-graphic observations on the dynamic responses of protoplasm of a potato cell to infection by Phytophthora infestans. Phytopath. Z. 76, 80–86Google Scholar
  18. Knogge, W. (1991) Plant resistance genes for fungal pathogensphysiological models and identification in cereal crops. Z. Naturforsch. 46c, 969–981Google Scholar
  19. Kombrink, E., Beerhus, L., Garcia-Garcia, F., Hahlbrock, K., Müller, M., Schröder, M., Witte, B., Schmelzer, E. (1993) Expression patterns of defense-related genes in infected and uninected plants. In: Mechanisms of plant defense responses (Proceedings of the 2nd conference of the european foundation for plant pathology), pp. 236–249, Fritig, B., Legrand, M., eds. Kluwer Academic Publ., DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  20. Meyer, S.L.F., Heath, M.C. (1988) A comparison of the death induced by fungal invasion or toxic chemicals in cowpea epidermal cells. I. Cell death induced by heavy metal salts. Can. J. Bot. 66, 613–623Google Scholar
  21. McFadden, G.I., Bonig, I., Cornish, E.C., Clarke, A.E. (1988) A simple fixation and embedding method for use in hybridization histochemistry on plant tissues. Histochemical J. 20, 575–586Google Scholar
  22. Pristou, R., Gallegly, M.E. (1954) Leaf penetration by Phytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 44, 81–86Google Scholar
  23. Schmelzer, E., Krüger-Lebus, S., Hahlbrock, K. (1989) Temporal and spatial patterns of gene expression around sites of attempted fungal infection in parsley leaves. Plant Cell 1, 993–1001Google Scholar
  24. Schröder, M., Hahlbrock, K., Kombrink, E. (1992) Temporal and spatial patterns of 1,3-β-glucanase and chitinase induction in potato leaves infected by Phytophthora infestans. Plant J. 2, 161–172Google Scholar
  25. Shimony, C., Friend, J. (1975) Ultrastructure of the interaction between Phytophthora infestans and leaves of two cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Orion and Majestic. New Phytol. 74, 59–64Google Scholar
  26. Spielman, L.J., McMaster, B.J., Fry, W.E. (1989) Dominance and recessiveness for virulence against potato and tomato in Phytophthora infestans. Theor, Appl. Genet. 77, 832–838Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, J.L., Fritzemeier, K.H., Häuser, I., Kombrink, E., Rohwer, F., Schröder, M., Strittmatter, G., Hahlbrock, K. (1990) Structural analysis and activation by fungal infection of a gene encoding a pathogenesis-related protein in potato. Mol. PlantMicrobe Interact. 3, 72–77Google Scholar
  28. Tomiyama, K. (1956) Cell physiological studies on the resistance of potato plant to Phytophthora infestans. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Jap. 21, 54–62Google Scholar
  29. Tomiyama, K. (1971) Cytobiological and biochemical studies of the hypersensitive reaction of potato cells to Phytophthora infestans. In: Morphological events in plant-parasite interactions, pp. 387–399, Akai, S., Quchi, S., eds Phytopath. Soc. of Japan, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  30. Tomiyama, K. (1983) Research on the hypersensitive response. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 21, 1–12Google Scholar
  31. Tourtelotte, W.W., Verity, A.N., Schmid, P., Martinez, S., Shapshak, P. (1987) Covalent binding of formalin fixed paraffin embedded brain tissue sections to glass slides suitable for in situ hybridization. J. Virol. Meth. 15, 87–99Google Scholar
  32. Wilson, U.E., Coffey, M.D. (1980) Cytological evaluation of general resistance to Phytophthora infestans in potato foliage. Ann. Bot. 45, 81–90Google Scholar
  33. Woods, A.M., Fagg, J., Mansfield, J.W. (1988) Fungal development and irreversible membrane damage in cells of Lactuca sativa undergoing the hypersensitive reaction to the downy mildew fungus Bremia lactucae. Physiol. Mol Plant Pathol. 32, 483–497Google Scholar
  34. Xu, H., Mendgen, K. (1991) Early events in living epidermal cells of cowpea and broad bean during infection with basidiospores of the cowpea rust fungus. Can. J. bot. 69, 2279–2285Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sibylle Freytag
    • 1
  • Nikolaos Arabatzis
    • 1
  • Klaus Hahlbrock
    • 1
  • Elmon Schmelzer
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für ZüchtungsforschungKölnGermany

Personalised recommendations