Planta

, Volume 187, Issue 4, pp 505–510 | Cite as

Kinetics of wound-induced hydraulic signals and variation potentials in wheat seedlings

  • M. Malone
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Displacement transducers were used to demonstrate that localised wounding causes a rapid and systemic increase in leaf thickness in seedlings of wheat (Triticum durum Desf. cv. Iva). These increases are interpreted as reflecting wound-induced hydraulic signals. The duration of the wound-induced increase was found to be about 1 h or more, and it was shown that repeated wounds could induce repeated responses. The increase occurred even when plants had no access to an external water supply. Change in leaf thickness was shown closely to reflect change in leaf water potential. The velocity and kinetics of the wound-induced hydraulic signal were measured using multiple transducers ranged along a single leaf. The front of the signal was shown to travel through the plant at rates of at least 10 cm · s−1. Development of the increase in leaf thickness was found to be relatively faster furthest from the wound. Onset of the change in leaf thickness in leaves remote from the wound was shown to precede onset of changes in surface electrical potential (variation potential) which are also induced by wounding. In contrast to reports from other species, variation potentials in wheat were here shown to spread extremely rapidly, at rates similar to that of the hydraulic signal. These data support the view that wound-induced hydraulic signals are the trigger for variation potentials in wheat.

Key words

Hydraulic signal Triticum (wound, signal) Wound response Water potential 

Symbol:

Ψw

water potential

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowles, D.J. (1990) Defense-related proteins in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59, 873–907Google Scholar
  2. Chessin, M., Zipf, A.E. (1990) Alarm systems in higher plants. Bot. Rev. 56, 193–235Google Scholar
  3. Cosgrove, D.J., Durachko, D.M. (1986) Automated pressure probe for measurement of water transport properties of higher plant cells. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 2614–2619Google Scholar
  4. Frachisse, J.-M., Desbiez, M.-O. (1989) Investigation of the wave of electric depolarization induced by wounding in Bidens pilosus L. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen. 185, 357–368Google Scholar
  5. Haberlandt, G. (1890) Das reizleitende Gewebesystem der Sinnpflanze. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  6. Hüsken, D., Steudle, E., Zimmermann, U. (1978) Pressure probe technique for measuring water relations of cells in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 61, 158–163Google Scholar
  7. MacDougal, D.T. (1896) The mechanism of movement and transmission of impulses in Mimosa and other “sensitive” plants: a review with some additional experiments. Bot Gaz. XXII, 296–303Google Scholar
  8. Malone, M., Stanković, B. (1991) Surface potentials and hydraulic signals in wheat leaves following localised wounding by heat. Plant Cell Environ. 14, 431–436Google Scholar
  9. Matsuda K., Rayan, A. (1990) Anatomy: a key factor regulating plant tissue response to water stress. In: Environmental injury to plants, pp. 63–88, Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Meidner, H. (1990) The absorption lag, epidermal turgor and stomata. J. Exp. Bot. 41, 1115–1118Google Scholar
  11. Nakahori, K., Koizumi, K., Muramatsu, S., Ohtani, H., Masuko, M., Nakase, S., Katou, K., Okamoto, H. (1990) Measurement of the respiration dependent component of intracellular pressure with an improved pressure probe. Plant Cell Physiol. 31, 859–864Google Scholar
  12. Pickard, B.G. (1973) Action potentials in higher plants. Bot. Rev. 39, 172–201Google Scholar
  13. Raschke, K. (1970) Leaf hydraulic system: rapid epidermal and stomatal responses to changes in water supply. Science 167, 189–191Google Scholar
  14. Ricca, U. (1916) Soluzione d'un problema di fisiologia. La propagazione di stimulo nella Mimosa. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. 23, 51–170Google Scholar
  15. Roblin, G. (1979) Mimosa pudica: a model for the study of the excitability in plants. Biol. Rev. 54, 135–153Google Scholar
  16. Roblin, G. (1985) Analysis of the variation potential induced by wounding in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 26, 455–467Google Scholar
  17. Ryan, C.A., An, G. (1988) Molecular biology of wound-inducible proteinase inhibitors in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 11, 345–349Google Scholar
  18. Schildknecht, H. (1984) Turgorins- new chemical messengers for plant behaviour. Endeavor 8, 113–117Google Scholar
  19. Sibaoka, T. (1969) Physiology of rapid movements in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 210, 165–184Google Scholar
  20. Tinz-Füchtmeier, A., Gradmann, D. (1990) Laser-interferometric re-examination of rapid conductance of excitation in Mimosa pudica. J. Exp. Bot. 41, 15–19Google Scholar
  21. Van Sambeek, J.W., Pickard, B.G. (1976) Mediation of rapid electrical, metabolic, transpirational, and photosynthetic changes by factore released from wounds. I. Variation potential and putative action potentials in intact plants. Can. J. Bot. 54, 2642–2650Google Scholar
  22. Wildon, C., Doherty, H.M., Eagles, G., Bowles, D.J., Thain, J.F. (1989) Systemic responses arising from localized heat stimuli in tomato plants. Ann. Bot. 64, 691–695Google Scholar
  23. Zhang, J., Davies, W.J. (1991) Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 42, 55–76Google Scholar
  24. Zimmermann, U., Steudle, E. (1978) Physical aspects of water relations of plant cells. Adv. Bot. Res. 6, 45–117Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Malone
    • 1
  1. 1.HRI WellesbourneWarwicksUK

Personalised recommendations