Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 168, Issue 4, pp 491–497 | Cite as

Navigation by spatial memory and use of visual landmarks in octopuses

  • Jennifer A. Mather
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    This study begins to evaluate how octopuses navigate, and whether they can use visual landmarks. Paths ofOctopus vulgaris were observed in the field as they foraged and responded to displacements.Octopus rubescens were trained to orient to a beacon in the laboratory, and response to its displacement was monitored.

     
  2. 2.

    Octopuses foraged using chemotactile exploration but did not retrace their outgoing paths.

     
  3. 3.

    Octopuses learned to orient to a beacon for a food reward, and oriented directly to it when it was moved 90° each day.

     
  4. 4.

    When a three-landmark array was presented to one octopus it oriented first to the largest landmark, then to the beacon. It responded to movement of one or more landmarks suggesting both orienting to this conspicuous landmark and going to where the beacon ought to have been.

     
  5. 5.

    The lack of disruption of octopuses' return home in the field by movement of an artificial landmark, the significant prediction of whether they would eat away from home by distance from the home, and their ease of return home when they were displaced by territorial fish, in combination with the lab data, suggested that octopuses can and do use a long-term memory of a visual landmark array.

     

Key words

Memory Navigation Octopus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arey LB, Crozier WJ (1918) The homing habits of the pulmonate molluskOnchidium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 4:319–321Google Scholar
  2. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1983) Landmark learning in bees. J Comp Physiol 151:521–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chelazzi G, Focardi S, Deneubourg JL (1983a) A comparative study on the movement patterns of two sympatric tropical chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). Mar Biol 74:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chelazzi G, Innocenti R, DellaSantina P (1983b) Zonal migration and trail-following of an intertidal gastropod analyzed by LED tracking in the field. Mar Beh Physiol 10:121–136Google Scholar
  5. Chelazzi G, Della Santini P, Vannini M (1985) Long-lasting substrate marking in the collective homing of the gastropodNerita textilis. Biol Bull 168:214–221Google Scholar
  6. Cheng K (1988) Some psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks. J Comp Physiol A 162:815–826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng K, Collett TS, Pickhard A, Wehner R (1987) The use of visual landmarks by honeybees: bees weigh landmarks according to their distance from the goal. J Comp Physiol A 161:469–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collett TS, Cartwright BA, Smith BA (1986) Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils. J Comp Physiol A 158:835–851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook A (1977) Mucus trail following by the slugLimax grossui Lupu. Anim Behav 25:774–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook A, Bamford OS, Freeman JDB, Teideman DJ (1969) A study of the homing habit of the limpet. Anim Beh 17:330–339Google Scholar
  11. Cook SB, Cook CB (1975) Directionality in the trail-following response of the pulmonate limpetSiphonaria alternata. Mar Beh Physiol 3:147–155Google Scholar
  12. Etienne AS, Maurer R, Saucy F (1988) Limitations in the assessment of path dependent information. Behav 106:81–111Google Scholar
  13. Etienne AS, Teroni E, Hurni C, Partenier V (1990) The effect of a single light cue on homing behaviour of the golden hamster. Anim Beh 39:17–41Google Scholar
  14. Graziadei PPC, Gagne HT (1976) Sensory innervation in the rim of the octopus sucker. J Morphol 150:639–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton PV, Russell BJ (1982) Field experiments on the sense organs and directional cues involved in offshore-oriented swimming byAplysia brasiliana Rang (Mollusca: Gastropoda). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 56:123–143Google Scholar
  16. Hartwick EB, Ambrose RF, Robinson S (1984) Den utilization and the movements of taggedOctopus dofleini. Mar Beh Physiol 11:95–110Google Scholar
  17. Lima SL, Valone TJ, Caraco T (1985) Foraging efficiency — predation risk trade-off in the grey squirrel. Anim Beh 33:155–164Google Scholar
  18. Maldonaldo H (1964) The control of attack byOctopus. Z Vergl Physiol 47:656–674Google Scholar
  19. Mather JA (1980) Social organization and use of space byOctopus joubini in a semi-natural situation. Bull Mar Sci 30:848–857Google Scholar
  20. Mather JA (1988) Daytime activity of juvenileOctopus vulgaris in Bermuda. Malacologia 29:69–76Google Scholar
  21. Mather JA (1991) Foraging, feeding, and prey remains in middens of juvenileOctopus vulgaris. J Zool (Lond) (in press)Google Scholar
  22. Mather JA (1991) Interactions of juvenileOctopus vulgaris with scavenging and territorial fishes. Manuscript in submissionGoogle Scholar
  23. Mather JA, O'Dor RK (1991) Foraging, energetics, movement patterns and the life history of juvenileOctopus vulgaris. Bull Mar Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  24. Mather JA, Resler S, Cosgrove J (1985) Activity and movement ofOctopus dofleini. Mar Beh Physiol 11:301–314Google Scholar
  25. Olton DS, Samuelson RJ (1976) Remembrance of places passed: Spatial memory in rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Beh Proc 2:97–116Google Scholar
  26. Paine RT (1963) Food recognition and predation on opisthobranchs byNavanax inermis. Veliger 6:1–9Google Scholar
  27. Phelps MT, Roberts WA (1989) Central-place foraging byRattus norvegicus on a radial maze. J Comp Psychol 103:326–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberts WA (1988) Foraging and spatial memory in pigeons. J Comp Psychol 102:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spetch ML, Edwards CA (1988) Pigeons',Columba livia, use of global and local cues for spatial memory. Anim Behav 36:293–296Google Scholar
  30. Tankersley RA (1990) Trail following inLittorina irrorata: the influence of visual stimuli and the possible role of tracking in orientation. Veliger 33:116–123Google Scholar
  31. Tinbergen N (1972a) On the orientation of the digger waspPhilanthus triangulum Fabr. I. In: Tinbergen N: The animal in its world, vol 1: Field studies. Allan & Unwin, New York, pp 103–127Google Scholar
  32. Tinbergen N (1972b) On the orientation of the digger waspPhilanthus triangulum Fabr. III. Selective learning of landmarks. In: Tinbergen N: The animal in its world, vol. 1: Field studies. Allan & Unwin, New York, pp 146–196Google Scholar
  33. Trott TJ, Dimock RV Jr. (1978) Intraspecific trail following by mud snailIlyanassa obsoleta. Mar Behav Physiol 5:91–101Google Scholar
  34. Wehner R, Raber F (1979) Visual spatial memory in desert antsCataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Experientia 35:1569–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wells MJ (1978) Octopus: Physiology and behaviour of an advanced invertebrate. Halstead, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson ED (1971) The insect societies. Belknap, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer A. Mather
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentThe University of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations