Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 73–83 | Cite as

High-order behaviour in learning gate networks with lateral inhibition

Original Papers
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

In this work we present a neural network model incorporating activity-dependent presynaptic facilitation with multidimensional inputs. The processing unit used is based on a slightly simplified version of the Learning Gate Model proposed by Ciaccia et al. (1992). The network topology integrates a well-known biological neural circuit with a lateral inhibition connection subnet. By means of simulation experiments, we show that the proposed networks exhibit basic and high-order features of associative learning. In particular, overshadowing and blocking are reproduced in the presence of both noise-free and noisy inputs. The role of noise in the development of high-order learning capabilities is also discussed.

Keywords

Network Model Network Topology Simulation Experiment Processing Unit Neural Network Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey CH, Chen M (1988) Long-term memory in Aplysia modulates the total number of varicosities of single identified sensory neurons. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 85:2373–2377Google Scholar
  2. Buonomano DV, Byrne JH (1990) Long-term synaptic changes produced by a cellular analog of classical conditioning in Aplysia. Science 249:420–423Google Scholar
  3. Buonomano DV, Baxter DA, Byrne JH (1990) Small networks of empirically derived adaptive elements simulate some higher-order features of classical conditioning. Neural Networks 3:507–523Google Scholar
  4. Byrne JH (1987) Cellular analysis of associative learning. Physiol Rev 67:329–439Google Scholar
  5. Byrne JH, Eskin A, Scholz KP (1989) Neuronal mechanisms contributing to long-term sensitization in Aplysia. J Physiol 83:141–147Google Scholar
  6. Byrne JH, Baxter DA, Buonomano DV, Raymond JL (1990) Neuronal and network determinants of simple and higher-order features of associative learning: experimental and modeling approach. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 55:175–186Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter GA, Grossberg S (1990) ART3: Hierarchical search using chemical transmitters in self-organizing pattern recognition architectures. Neural Networks 3:129–152Google Scholar
  8. Castellucci VF, Kandel ER (1976) Presynaptic facilitation as a mechanism for behavioral sensitization in Aplysia. Science 94:1176–1178Google Scholar
  9. Ciaccia P, Maio D, Vacca GP (1992) An analytical short-and long-term memory model of presynaptic plasticity. Biol Cybern 67:335–345Google Scholar
  10. Gingrich KJ, Byrne JH (1985) Simulation of synaptic depression, posttetanic potentiation, and presynaptic facilitation of synaptic potentials from sensory neurons mediating gill-withdrawal in Aplysia. J Neurophysiol 53:652–669Google Scholar
  11. Gingrich KJ, Byrne JH (1987) Single-cell neuronal model for associative learning. J Neurophysiol 57:1705–1715Google Scholar
  12. Gingrich KJ, Baxter DA, Byrne JH (1988) Mathematical model of cellular mechanisms contributing to presynaptic facilitation. Brain Res Bull 21:513–520Google Scholar
  13. Gluck MA, Thompson RF (1987) Modeling the neural substrates of associative learning and memory: a computational approach. Psychol Rev 94:176–191Google Scholar
  14. Grossberg S, Levine DS (1987) Neural dynamics of attentionally modulated Pavlovian conditioning: blocking, interstimulus interval, and secondary reinforcement. Appl Optics 26:5015–5030Google Scholar
  15. Hawkins RD (1989a) A biologically based computational model for several simple forms of learning. In: Hawkins RD, Bower GH (eds) Computational models of learning in simple neural systems. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawkins RD (1989b) A biologically realistic neural network model for higher-order features of classical conditioning. In: Morris RGM (eds) Parallel distribuited processing, implications for psychology and neurology. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawkins RD, Kandel ER (1984) Is there a cell-biological alphabet for simple forms of learning? Psychol Rev 91:375–391Google Scholar
  18. Hawkins RD, Abrams TW, Carew TJ, Kandel ER (1983) A cellular mechanism of classical conditioning in Aplysia: activity-dependent amplification of presynaptic facilitation. Science 219:400–405Google Scholar
  19. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH (1982) Molecular biology of learning: modulation of transmitter release. Science 218:433–443Google Scholar
  20. Kandel ER, Abrams TW, Bernier L, Carew TJ, Hawkins RD (1983) Classical conditioning and sensitization share aspects of same molecular cascade in Aplysia. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 48:821–830Google Scholar
  21. Kohonen T (1984) Self-organization and associative memory. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.Google Scholar
  22. Mackintosh NJ (1974) The psychology of animal learning. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Rescorla RA, Wagner AR (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement. In: Black AH, Prokasy VF (eds) Classical conditioning II: current research and theory. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 64–99Google Scholar
  24. Small SA, Kandel ER, Hawkins RD (1989) Activity-dependent enhancement of presynaptic inhibition in Aplysia sensory neurons. Science 243:1603–1606Google Scholar
  25. Sutton RS, Barto AG (1990) Time-derivative models of Pavlovian reinforcement. In: Gabriel M, Moore JW (eds) Learning and computational neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  26. Walters ET, Byrne JH (1983) Associative conditioning of single sensory neurons suggests a cellular mechanism for learning. Science 219:405–408Google Scholar
  27. Witt JC, Clark JW (1990) Experiments in artificial psychology: conditioning f asynchronous neural networks models. Math Biosci 99:77–104Google Scholar
  28. Yuille AL, Grzywacz NM (1993) A winner-take-all mechanism based on presynaptic inhibition feedback. Neural Comput 1:334–347Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.C.I.O.C.-C.N.R. and Dipartimento di ElettronicaInformatica e Sistemistica, Università di BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations