Advertisement

Journal of Cryptology

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 79–130 | Cite as

Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis

  • R. Kemmerer
  • C. Meadows
  • J. Millen
Article

Abstract

Three experimental methods have been developed to help apply formal methods to the security verification of cryptographic protocols of the sort used for key distribution and authentication. Two of these methods are based on Prolog programs, and one is based on a general-purpose specification and verification system. All three combine algebraic with state-transition approaches. For purposes of comparison, they were used to analyze the same example protocol with a known flaw.

Key words

Interrogator Narrower Inatest Ina Jo Key distribution Authentication Security Protocols Formal methods Specification Verification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Abadi, M., and M. R. Tuttle, A Semantics for a Logic of Authentication, Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on Distributed Computing, ACM Press, New York, August 1991, pp. 201–206.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bieber, P., A Logic of Communication in a Hostile Environment, Proceedings of the Computer Security Foundations Workshop III, IEEE Computer Society Press, New York, June 1990, pp. 14–22.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Boudet, A., Unification in a Combination of Equational Theories: an Efficient Algorithm, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990, pp. 292–307.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Burns, J., and C. J. Mitchell, A Security Scheme for Resource Sharing Over a Network, Comput. Security, Vol. 9, 1990, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Burrows, M., M. Abadi, and R. M. Needham, A Logic of Authentication, ACM Trans. Comput. Systems, Vol. 8, No. 1, February 1990, pp. 18–36.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Clocksin, W. F., and C. S. Mellish, Programming in Prolog, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Denning, D. E., and G. M. Sacco, Timestamps in Key Distribution Protocols, Comm. ACM, Vol. 24, No. 8, August 1981, pp. 533–536.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Dolev, D., and A. Yao, On the Security of Public-Key Protocols, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 29, 1983, pp. 198–203.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Eckmann, S. T., and R. A. Kemmerer, INATEST: An Interactive Environment for Testing Formal Specifications, Third Workshop on Formal Verification, Pajaro Dunes, CA, February, 1985, ACM—Software Engrg Notes, Vol. 10, No. 4, August 1985, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Goldwasser, S., S. Micali, and C. Rackoff, The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems, Siam J. Comput., Vol. 18, No. 1, February 1989, pp. 186–208.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Holzmann, G., The Design and Validation of Computer Protocols, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Kemmerer, R. A., Analyzing Encryption Protocols Using Formal Verification Techniques, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 7, No. 4, May 1989, pp. 448–457.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kemmerer, R. A., Integrating Formal Methods into the Development Process, IEEE Software, September 1990, pp. 37–50.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kemmerer, R. A., Analyzing the Tatebayashi-Matsuzaki-Newman Protocol Using Inatest, UCSB Report No. TRCS91–05, Computer Science Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, April 1991.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Longley, D., Expert Systems Applied to the Analysis of Key Management Schemes, Comput. Security, Vol. 6, 1987, pp. 54–67.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Massey, J. L., Cryptography and Provability, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Concepts of Dependable Systems, Mathematisches Forschunginstitut Oberwolfach, Oberwolfach, April 1990.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Meadows, C., A System for the Specification and Verification of Key Management Protocols, Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, New York, 1991, pp. 182–195.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Meadows, C., Applying Formal Methods to the Analysis of a Key Management Protocol, J. Comput. Security, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1992, pp. 5–53.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Merritt, M., and P. Wolper, States of Knowledge in Cryptographic Protocols, unpublished manuscript, 1985.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Millen, J. K., The Interrogator: A Tool for Cryptographic Protocol Security, Proceedings of the 1984 Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, New York, pp. 134–141.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Millen, J. K., S. C. Clark, and S. B. Freedman, The Interrogator: Protocol Security Analysis, IEEE Trans. Software Engrg., Vol. 13, No. 2, February 1987.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Moore, J. H., Protocol Failures in Cryptosystems, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 76, No. 5, May 1988, pp. 564–602.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Needham, R. M., and M. D. Schroeder, Using Encryption for Authentication in Large Networks of Computers, Comm. ACM, Vol. 21, No. 12, December 1978, pp. 993–999.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Rety, P., C. Kirchner, H. Kirchner, and P. Lescanne, NARROWER: A New Algorithm for Unification and Its Applications to Logic Programming, in Rewriting Techniques and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 202, Jean-Pierre Jouannaud, ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985, pp. 141–157.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Scheid, J., and S. Holtsberg, Ina Jo Specification Language Reference Manual, TM-6021, Unisys Corporation, Culver City, CA, May 1989.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Simmons, G. J., How To (Selectively) Broadcast a Secret, Proceedings of the 1985 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, New York, 1985, pp. 108–113.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Syverson, P. and Meadows, C., A Logical Language for Specifying Cryptographic Protocol Requirements, in Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, New York, 1993, pp. 165–177.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Tatebayashi, M., N. Matsuzaki, and D. B. Newman, Key Distribution Protocol for Digital Mobile Communication Systems, in Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '89, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 435, G. Brassard, ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991, pp. 324–333.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Toussaint, M.-J., Separating the Specification and Implementation Phases in Cryptology (Extended Abstract), Computer Security, ESORICS 92, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 648, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992, pp. 77–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Cryptologic Research 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Kemmerer
    • 1
  • C. Meadows
    • 2
  • J. Millen
    • 3
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Naval Research LaboratoryWashington, DCUSA
  3. 3.The MITRE CorporationBedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations