Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 169, Issue 4, pp 479–491

The role of the underwater polarized light pattern, in sun compass navigation of the grass shrimp, Palaemonetes vulgaris

  • Sydnee M. Goddard
  • Richard B. ForwardJr.
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    The sky polarized light pattern is visible underwater within the critical angle of refraction and can be used to position the sun in the sky. The present study determined whether the shrimp, Palaemonetes vulgaris could use this polarization pattern for sun compass orientation.

     
  2. 2.

    In the laboratory, Palaemonetes oriented parallel to the e-vector of downwelling polarized light regardless of their phototactic state. Outside, they used the sun or blue sky as a cue for orientation in the offshore direction of their home shoreline. In nature, this is an escape response directed away from shoreline predators. Shrimp were disoriented under cloudy skies.

     
  3. 3.

    The shrimp could orient using blue sky alone from any altitude (above 17°) and from azimuths in the antisolar but not the solar hemisphere. Small circles of blue sky, subtending a 27° angle, were sufficient for orientation.

     
  4. 4.

    When the alignment of the natural polarization pattern was shifted with polarized filters, the shrimps' orientation shifted similarly. The polarized light pattern was used in conjunction with another blue sky cue, possibly the skylight intensity pattern. Neither cue contained sufficient orientation information to be used alone. Palaemonetes vulgaris was the first aquatic arthropod shown to use the polarization pattern for sun compass orientation.

     

Key words

Natural polarotaxis underwater Palaemonetes Arthropods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aneshansley DJ, Larkin TS (1981) V-test is not a statistical test of ‘homeward’ direction. Nature 273:239Google Scholar
  2. Bainbridge E, Waterman TH (1957) Polarized light and the orientation of two marine crustaceans. J Exp Mar Biol 34:342–364Google Scholar
  3. Bardolph M, Stavn RH (1978) Polarized light sensitivity in the stage I zoea of the mud crab Panopeus herbstii. Mar Biol (Berl) 46(4): 327–334Google Scholar
  4. Baylor ER, Smith FE (1953) The orientation of Cladocera to polarized light. Am Nat 87:97–101Google Scholar
  5. Brines ML, Gould JL (1979) Bees have rules. Science 206:571–573Google Scholar
  6. Douglass JK, Forward RB Jr (1989) The ontogeny of facultative superposition optics in a shrimp eye: hatching through metamorphosis. Cell Tissue Res 258:289–300Google Scholar
  7. Edrich W, Helversen O von (1976) Polarized light orientation of the honey bee: the minimal visual angle. J Comp Physiol 109:309–314Google Scholar
  8. Frisch K von (1949) Die Polarisation des Himmelslichtes als orientierender Faktor bei den Tänzen der Bienen. Experientia 5:142–148Google Scholar
  9. Frisch K von (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  10. Goddard SM, Forward RB Jr (1989) The use of celestial cues in the offshore escape response of the shrimp, Palaemonetes vulgaris (Say). Mar Behav Physiol 16:11–18Google Scholar
  11. Goddard SM, Forward RB Jr (1990) Decay and learning of an y-axis orientation behavior: the offshore escape response of the shrimp Palaemonetes vulgaris (Say). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 142:137–150Google Scholar
  12. Hazen WE, Baylor ER (1962) Behavior of Daphnia in polarized light. Biol Bull 123:243–252Google Scholar
  13. Herrnkind WF (1972) Orientation in shore-living arthropods, especially the sand fiddler crab. In: Winn HE, Olla BL (eds) Behavior of marine animals, vol. 1: Invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 1–59Google Scholar
  14. Jander R, Waterman TH (1960) Sensory discrimination between polarized light and light intensity patterns by arthropods. J Cell Comp Physiol 56(3):137–159Google Scholar
  15. Knowlton RE, Williams AB (1970) The life history of Palaemonetes vulgaris (Say) and P. pugio (Holthuis) in coastal North Carolina. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 86:185Google Scholar
  16. Leggett LMW (1976) Polarised light-sensitive interneurons in a swimming crab. Nature 262:709–711Google Scholar
  17. Lythgoe JN (1979) The ecology of vision. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 11–14Google Scholar
  18. Lythgoe JN, Hemmings CC (1967) Polarized light and underwater vision. Nature 213:893–894Google Scholar
  19. Menzel R, Snyder AW (1974) Polarized light detection in the bee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol 88:247–270Google Scholar
  20. Rossel S, Wehner R (1982) The bee's map of the e-vector pattern in the sky. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:4451–4455Google Scholar
  21. Rossel S, Wehner R (1984) How bees analyse the polarization patterns in the sky. J Comp Physiol A 154:607–615Google Scholar
  22. Rossel S, Wehner R (1986) Polarization vision in bees. Nature 323:128–131Google Scholar
  23. Rossel S, Wehner R, Lindauer M (1978) E-vector orientation in bees. J Comp Physiol 125:1–12Google Scholar
  24. Schinz RH (1975) Structural specialization in the dorsal retina of the bee, Apis mellifera. Cell Tissue Res 162:23–34Google Scholar
  25. Shaw SR (1969a) Interreceptor coupling in ommatidia of drone honeybee and locust compound eyes. Vision Res 9:999–1029Google Scholar
  26. Shaw SR (1969b) Sense-cell structure and interspecies comparisons of polarized-light absorption in arthropod compound eyes. Vision Res 9:1031–1040Google Scholar
  27. Umminger BR (1968) Polarotaxis in copepods: I. An endogenous rhythm in polarotaxis in Cyclops vernalis and its relation to vertical migration. Biol Bull 135:239–251Google Scholar
  28. Waterman TH (1954) Polarization patterns in submarine illumination. Science 120:927–932Google Scholar
  29. Waterman TH (1981) Polarization sensitivity. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates. (Handbook of sensory physiology VII/ 6B). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 281–469Google Scholar
  30. Waterman TH (1988) Polarization of marine light fields and animal orientation. SPIE Vol 925 Ocean Optics IX, pp 431–437Google Scholar
  31. Waterman TH, Horch KW (1966) Mechanism of polarized light perception. Science 154:467–475Google Scholar
  32. Waterman TH, Westell WE (1956) Quantitative effect of the sun's position on submarine light polarization. J Mar Res 15:149–169Google Scholar
  33. Wehner R (1976) Polarized-light navigation by insects. Sci Am 238(1): 106–115Google Scholar
  34. Wehner R (1982) The bee's celestial map. A simplified model of the outside world. In: Breed MD, Michener CD, Evans HE (eds) The biology of social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp 375–379Google Scholar
  35. Wehner R (1983) The perception of polarized light. In: Cosens D, Vince-Prue D (eds) The biology of photoreception. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge London, pp 331–369Google Scholar
  36. Young S, Taylor VA (1990) Swimming tracks in swarms of cladoceran species. Anim Behav 39:10–16Google Scholar
  37. Zar JH (1974) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  38. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, second editionGoogle Scholar
  39. Zolotov VV, Frantsevich LI (1973) Orientation of bees by the polarized light of a limited area of the sky. J Comp Physiol 85:25–36Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sydnee M. Goddard
    • 1
  • Richard B. ForwardJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Duke University Marine LaboratoryPivers Island, BeaufortUSA
  2. 2.Zoology DepartmentDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations