Advertisement

Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 70, Issue 3, pp 227–234 | Cite as

Mathematical model for self-organization of direction columns in the primate middle temporal area

  • Shigeru Tanaka
  • Hiroyuki Shinbata
Article

Abstract

We attempted to reproduce modular structures for direction selectivity characteristic of the primate middle temporal area (MT) based on our thermodynamic model for the activity-dependent self-organization of neural networks. We assumed that excitatory afferent input to MT neurons arises from V1 and/or V2 neurons which are selective to both orientation of a visual stimulus and direction of its motion, and that such input is modifiable and becomes selectively connected through the process of self-organization. By contrast, local circuit connections within MT are unmodifiable and remain nonselectively connected (isotropic). The present simulations reproduced characteristic patterns of organization in the cortex of MT in that: (1) preferred directions of the afferent input gradually shifted, except for singularity lines where direction abruptly changed by 180°; (2) model MT neurons located between the singularity lines responded to unidirectionally moving stimuli, closely reflecting preferred direction of the afferent input; (3) neurons responding to stimuli moving in two opposite directions were located along the singularity lines; and (4) neurons responding to stimuli moving in any direction were clustered at the ends of the singularity lines. When the strength of the lateral inhibition was decreased, direction selectivity of MT neurons was reduced. Therefore, the lateral inhibition, even if isotropic, strengthens the direction selectivity of MT neurons. Expression of singularities changed depending on a parameter that represents the relative dominance of the direction selectivity to the orientation selectivity of the afferent input. When the direction selectivity was predominant, singularity points were formed, while when the orientation selectivity prevailed, the MT was covered by two-dimensional singularity networks. Line singularities similar to those experimentally observed were reproduced when these two types of selectivity were in balance.

Keywords

Lateral Inhibition Prefer Direction Relative Dominance Singularity Point Present Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albright TD (1989) Centrifugal directional bias in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque. Vis Neurosci 2:177–188Google Scholar
  2. Albright TD, Desimone R, Gross CG (1984) Columnar organization of directionally selective cell in visual area MT of the macaque. J Neurophysiol 51:16–31Google Scholar
  3. Baker J, Petersen SE, Newsome WT, Allman JM (1981) Visual response properties of neurons in four extrastriate visual areas of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus): a quantitative comparison of medial, dorsomedial, dorsolateral, and middle temporal areas. J Neurophysiol 45:397–416Google Scholar
  4. Hubel DH, Livingstone MS (1987) Segregation of form, color, and stereopsis in primate area 18. J Neurosci 7:3378–3415Google Scholar
  5. Maunsell JHR, Van Essen DC (1983a) The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 3:2563–2586Google Scholar
  6. Maunsell JHR, Van Essen DC (1983b) Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. J Neurophysiol 49:1127–1147Google Scholar
  7. Maunsell JHR, Van Essen DC (1987) Topographic organization of the middle temporal visual area in the macaque monkey: representational biases and the relationship to cal-losal connections and myeloarchitectonic boundaries. J Comp Neurol 266:535–555Google Scholar
  8. Miyashita M, Tanaka S (1992) A mathematical model for orientation column formation. Neuroreport 3:69–72Google Scholar
  9. Tanaka K, Hikosaka K, Saito H, Yukie M, Fukada Y, Iwai E (1986) Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 6:134–144Google Scholar
  10. Tanaka S (1990a) Theory of self-organization of cortical maps: mathematical framework. Neural Networks 3:625–640Google Scholar
  11. Tanaka S (1990b) Experience-dependent self-organization of biological neural networks. NEC R&D 98:1–15Google Scholar
  12. Tanaka S (1991) Theory of ocular dominance column formation: mathematical basis and computer simulation. Biol Cybern 64:263–272Google Scholar
  13. Tanaka S, Shinbata H (1993) A mathematical model for neuronal response properties and modular organization in the motion-processing area of the primate cerebral cortex. NEC R&D 34(1):1–11Google Scholar
  14. Wolf W, Hicks TP, Albus K (1986) The contribution of GABA-mediated inhibitory mechanisms to visual response properties of neurons in the kitten's striate cortex. J Neurosci 6:2779–2795Google Scholar
  15. Wörgötter F, Eysel UT (1987) Quantitative determination of orientational and directional components in the response of visual cortical cells to moving stimuli. Biol Cybern 57:349–355Google Scholar
  16. Zeki SM (1974) Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey. J Physiol 236:549–573Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shigeru Tanaka
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Shinbata
    • 1
  1. 1.Fundamental Research LaboratoriesNEC CorporationIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations