European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 501–505 | Cite as

The effect of industry-independent drug information on the prescribing of benzodiazepines in general practice

  • D. Berings
  • L. Blondeel
  • H. Habraken


In order to measure the effect of industry-independent information on the prescribing of benzodiazepines in general practice, 128 primary practitioners were randomly allocated to three intervention groups after stratification by year of graduation. One third of the participating physicians were forwarded written information about the indications and limitations of benzodiazepines, another third received both written and oral information, and the remaining third (the control group) obtained no information at all.

A comparison of the number of benzodiazepines prescribed per 100 patient contacts with prescription before and after the intervention showed an average decrease of 3% in the control group, of 14% in physicians who received only written information, and of 24% in physicians who were given additional oral information. Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed a significant difference at the 1% level in the number of benzodiazepines prescribed between physicians who received both written and oral information and the control group.

A follow-up survey conducted 4 weeks after the intervention showed that the oral information campaign positively affected physicians' attitudes about the value of oral drug information from an industry-independent source.

Key words

Benzodiazepines General Practice industry-independent drug information Prescribing intervention primary care 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Schaffner W, Ray WA, Federspiel CF, et al (1983) Improving antibiotic prescribing in office practice: a controlled trial of three educational methods. JAMA 250: 1728–1732Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avorn J, Soumerai S (1983) Improving drug therapy decisions through educational outreach. A randomized controlled trial of academically based ‘detailing’. N Engl J Med 308: 1457–1463Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avorn J, Soumerai S, Taylor W, et al (1988) Reduction of incorrect antibiotic dosing through a structured educational form. Arch Int Med 148: 1720–1724Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harvey K, et al (1986) Educational antibiotic advertising. Med J Aust 145: 28–32Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ray WA, Blaser DG, et al (1986) Reducing long term diazepam prescribing in office practice. A controlled trial of educational visits. JAMA 256: 2536–2539Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Catalan J, Gath DH (1985) Benzodiazepines in general practice: time for a decision. BMJ 290: 1374–1376Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drury VWM (1985) Benzodiazepines — a challenge to rational presribing. J R Coll Gen Pract 35: 86–88Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ashton H (1989) Risks of dependence on benzodiazepine drugs: a major problem of long term treatment. BMJ 298: 103–104Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The APA task force report on benzodiazepine dependence, toxicity, and abuse. (1991) Am J Psychiatry 148 (2): 151–152Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Health and Medical Research Council (1991) Guidelines for the prevention and management of benzodiazepine dependence. Monograph Series No 3, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Russell J, Lader M (1992) Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of benzodiazepine dependence. Mental Health Foundation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    NHG-standaard Slapeloosheid en Slaapmiddelen (1992) Huisarts en wetenschap 35: 212–219Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Balter MB, Manheimer DI, Mellinger GD, Uhlenhuth EH (1984) A cross-national comparison of anti-anxiety/sedative drug use. Curr Med Res Opin 8 [Suppl 4]: 5–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cannoodt L (1987) Informatieverwerving en andere determinanten van het voorschrijfgedrag van huisartsen in Vlaanderen. [Information processing and other determinants of the prescribing behaviour of general practitioners in Flanders] Gezondheid Samenleving 8: 231–240Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salinsky JV, Doré CJ (1987) Characteristics of long term benzodiazepine users in general practice. J Roy Coll Gen Pract 37: 202–204Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holm M (1988) Prescription of benzodiazepines in general practice in the County of Arhus, Denmark. Dan Med Bull 35: 495–499Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nolan L, O'Malley K (1988) Patients, prescribing, and benzodiazepines. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 35: 225–229Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simpson RJ, Power KG, Wallace LA, et al (1990) Controlled comparison of the characteristics of long-term benzodiazepine users in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 40: 22–26Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nicholas D, Hammond SM (1991) Personality characteristics of long-term benzodiazepine users. Person Individ Diff 13: 221–223Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lagro-Janssen ALM, Liberton IJW (1993) Profielen van regelmatige gebruikers van benzodiazepinen in een huisartspraktijk. [Profiles of regular users of benzodiazepines in a primary practice] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 137: 1969–1972Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hemminki E (1975) Review of literature on the factors affecting drug prescribing. Soc Sci Med 11: 115Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Soumerai SB, Avorn J (1990) Principles of educational outreach (‘academic detailing’) to improve clinical decision making. JAMA 263: 549–556Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ray WA, et al (1985) Persistence of improvement in antibiotic prescribing in office practice. JAMA 253: 1774–1776Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Berings
    • 1
  • L. Blondeel
    • 1
  • H. Habraken
    • 1
  1. 1.Project FarmakaGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations